The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Magnifier light

Manufactured by As One
Sourced in Japan

The Magnifier Light is a versatile lighting tool that combines a magnifying glass and a bright LED light. It is designed to provide clear and focused illumination for detailed tasks, such as intricate work, reading, and inspection.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using magnifier light

1

Evaluating Zirconia-Metal Bracket Bond Strength

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After the SBS test, each surface on both zirconia and metal bracket was observed under a light microscope (magnification×20, Magnifier Light, AS ONE, Osaka, Japan). The ARI was determined based on the presence of cement remaining on the zirconia, and the optimal images were recorded by a dental digital camera (EyeSpecial C-IV, Shofu, Koyoto, Japan ) (Fig. 3). The score is represented by a scale with five levels, ranging from 1 to 5: score 1 (A): almost all cement left on the zirconia surface; score 2 (B): more than 90% of the cement left on the zirconia surface; score 3 (C): more than 10% but less than 90% of the cement left on the zirconia surface; score 4 (D): less than 10% of the cement left on the zirconia surface; score 5 (E): no cement left on the zirconia surface. NS means no significant differences (p>0.05). The same capital letters indicate no significant differences in SBS for each row (p>0.05). The same number indicates no significant differences within each bracket at 24 h and thermocycling (p>0.05). To minimize deviations, all images were randomly selected and scored for ARI indices by three calibrated examiners. In case individual scores differed among the examiners, the majority score was chosen to be the final score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Measuring Remaining Dentin Thickness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Remaining dentin thickness (RDT) was measured according to the procedures described in previous studies 7, 9, 16) . It was the aggregate average of the vertical distances of all edge midpoints of tooth beams from dentin surface to pulp chamber, as measured using a digital micrometer (Absolute Digimatic, Mitutoyo, Kanagawa, Japan) with 10-μm accuracy. In addition, RDT of every face of the beams were observed by a glass magnifier (×20 magnification; Magnifier Light, Asone, Osaka, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Failure Mode Analysis of μTBS Test

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Failure modes of the specimens were observed after μTBS test. Observation was carried out using the glass magnifier (×20 magnification; Magnifier Light, Asone, Osaka, Japan). Failure modes of specimens were classified into the following three categories: Type 1: Adhesive failure (fracture within adhesive layer); Type 2: Mixed failure (fracture within adhesive layer and cohesive failure within dentin and/or resin); Type 3: Cohesive failure (fracture within dentin or composite resin only).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fracture Mode Analysis of Dental Adhesives

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fracture modes were determined using a microscope (×20, Magnifier Light, Asone, Osaka, Japan). Categories of the fracture modes were as follows: A: Cohesive failure within the adhesive resin cement only with partial primer failure, where remnants of resin were observed on the dentin surface. B: Adhesive failure at the primer-dentin interface only. C: Mixed adhesive failure with cohesive failure of dentin only as well as cohesive failure in dentin and adhesive failure at the resin-dentin interface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Failure Mode Analysis of µTBS Specimens

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After µTBS testing, the failure modes of the specimens were observed at ×20 magnification incident light microscope (Magnifier Light, Asone). The failure modes of the specimens were classified into the following three categories: Type 1: adhesive failure (fracture within the adhesive layer); Type 2: mixed failure (fracture within the adhesive layer and cohesive failure within dentin and/or resin); Type 3: cohesive failure (fracture within dentin or composite resin only).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!