The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Prism 7

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States, Japan, United Kingdom, Austria, Canada, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Lao People's Democratic Republic, China, Switzerland, Sweden, Finland, Spain, France

GraphPad Prism 7 is a data analysis and graphing software. It provides tools for data organization, curve fitting, statistical analysis, and visualization. Prism 7 supports a variety of data types and file formats, enabling users to create high-quality scientific graphs and publications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

32 527 protocols using prism 7

1

Statistical Analysis Methods for Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data shown are the means ± SD or SEM. Differences in the means between two groups were analyzed by performing an unpaired t test (Prism 7.0) if the data were normally distributed and the samples had equal variance, or by performing a non-parametric test (Mann–Whitney U test, Prism 7.0) if the data were not normally distributed. Means of more than two groups were analyzed by performing one-way ANOVA followed by the Dunnett multiple comparisons test (Prism 7.0) if the data were followed a Gaussian distribution and had equal variance, or by performing the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by Dunn’s multiple comparisons test (Prism 7.0) if the data were not normally distributed. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (Prism 7.0) was used to determine if the data followed a Gaussian distribution. The homogeneity of variance test (SPSS 22.0) or the Brown-Forsythe test (Prism 7.0) was used to test for equal variance. Differences with p < 0.05 were considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Kinetic and Functional Binding Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Competition binding data were normalized to specific binding in the absence of drug. Three or more independent competition experiments were conducted with duplicate determinations. Data was analyzed with GraphPAD Prism7 (La Jolla, CA), and IC50 values were converted to Ki values using the Cheng-Prusoff equation (Cheng and Prusoff, 1973 (link)) using Kd values previously determined (Eshleman et al., 2013 (link)). Differences in affinities were assessed by one-way ANOVA using the logarithms of Ki values and Dunnett’s multiple comparison test compared test compounds to a drug standard as noted. In uptake assays, IC50 values were determined using Prism7. The DAT/SERT ratio was determined by dividing 1/(DAT IC50) by 1/(SERT IC50), with higher values indicating more DAT selectivity (Baumann et al. 2012 (link)).
For release assays, fractional release was defined as radioactivity in a fraction divided by the total radioactivity remaining in cells. The area under the curve (AUC) for each time course was calculated using Prism7 with baseline defined as the average of the two lowest fractions. For each experiment, the basal release AUC in the absence of drug was subtracted from each AUC before normalizing to the percent of maximal METH-stimulated release. Prism7 was used to calculate EC50 values using sigmoidal nonlinear regression.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microbiota Profiling for Cerebrovascular Risk

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Test of normality was performed before the parametric analysis of Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA. Student’s t test: Unpaired parametric t test (two-tailed) was performed in data comparison of two groups in Prism7. Error bar represents SD. One-way ANOVA: No matching or pairing ANOVA was performed in data comparison of three groups or more in Prism7. Result was corrected for multiple comparisons using statistical hypothesis testing (Dunnett). Error bar represents SD. ROC analysis: In the current study, ROC analysis has been used to evaluate whether including relative abundance of gut microbiota, and/or the level of inflammaging markers, in addition to the usually used epidemiological characteristics parameters could increase the distinguishing efficacy for alarming moderate-severe aCSVD (burden = 2 to 4). Binary logistic regression was performed with the dependent parameter of grouping (two groups, aCSVD burden = 0 to 1 as false positives, and aCSVD burden = 2 to 4 as true positives) with the indicated covariates in SPSS. Probabilities were calculated in SPSS and subjected to Prism7 for ROC curve description. Spearman correlation: Correlation between every pair of datasets was computed with Pearson correlation coefficients. The value of r was visualized with heatmap in Prism7. Expression level of mRNA was interpreted as delta CT log2 in Spearman correlation analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Robust Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as mean ± SD. For quantification with two groups, Mann–Whitney test was used to assess statistical significance with GraphPad Prism 7. For quantification with more than two groups, one‐way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s test (Data with normal distribution) or Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s test (Data with non‐normal distribution) was used to assess statistical significance with GraphPad Prism 7. For quantification with two or more groups and groups that have subgroups, two‐way ANOVA analysis was used to assess statistical significance with GraphPad Prism 7. Data for two‐way ANOVA analysis were normally distributed (Shapiro–Wilk normality test). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were generated using GraphPad Prism 7 and analyzed using the log‐rank test, which is generally used for survival analysis (Cheng et al, 2013; Zhou et al, 2017). P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Detailed information is described in each figure panel. Exact P values are reported in Appendix Table S3. Randomization was used for animal studies. The studies were not performed blindly. Except for microarray experiment, similar results were obtained from three independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Virus Particle Binding Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each BLI experiment was repeated at least twice. Representative experiments were graphed. Initial binding rates, corresponding to the sloops of the binding curves during the first few minutes of the virus-binding experiments, were determined by second order polynominal equation (GraphPad Prism 7.04). The correlation between virus particle numbers and the initial binding rate was determined by linear regression and Pearson r analysis using GraphPad Prism 7.04 software. Significant differences between curves were analyzed by univariate analysis of variance model using IBM SPSS statistic 24. Fractional receptor densities correlating with half maximum initial binding rates were determined by non-linear regression analysis using GraphPad Prism 7.04 software. Significance analysis was based on two tailed unpaired t test or one way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparisons test (GraphPad Prism 7.04).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis Methods for Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For comparisons between two groups, data were analyzed by Welch’s t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann–Whitney U test for data not normally distributed, using Graph Pad Prism 7. For repeated samples, data were analyzed by paired t-test. Correlation was analyzed by the Pearson correlation using Graph Pad Prism 7. All tests are two-tailed. Statistical analyzes of the data were performed using Prism 7 software for the number of animals for each experiment indicated in the figure legends. Means and SEMs are reported for all experiments. For comparisons between multiple groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was used for normally distributed data. The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s correction was used for data that were not normally distributed. Experiments were carried out independently twice (Figs. 2b, c, 4a, b, 5b, c, h–j, 7b and Supplementary Figs. 1f, 3a–f, 5, 7f, 8f), three times (Fig. 1b, h–j, 2d–k, 3, 4c–h, 5e–f, 6c–d, 7c, g, and Supplementary Figs. 1a–d, 2b–f, i–j, 3g–l, 4a–c, f–i, 6, 7d–e, 8, 9a–d and 10), or four or more times (Figs. 1c–f, 6e–g, 7d–f and Supplementary Figs. 2g, i, 4d, e, 9e–h).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Statistical Analysis of Biological Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For comparisons between two groups, data were analyzed by Welch’s t-test for normally distributed data and the Mann–Whitney U test for data not normally distributed, using Graph Pad Prism 7. For repeated samples, data were analyzed by paired t-test. Correlation was analyzed by the Pearson correlation using Graph Pad Prism 7. All tests were two-tailed. Statistical analyzes of the data were performed using Prism 7 software for the number of animals for each experiment indicated in the figure legends. Means and SEMs are reported for all experiments. For comparisons between multiple groups, ANOVA followed by Tukey’s test was used for normally distributed data. The nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test followed by Dunn’s correction was used for data that were not normally distributed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Comparative Survival Analysis of Drug Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used for comparing three or more groups in Graphpad Prism 7.03. Sample sizes were equal (or nearly so) in all experiments using ANOVA/Tukey. Log-rank test (Mantel-Cox) was done for all three curves in Graphpad Prism 7.03 (p = 0.001) testing the null hypothesis that all the samples come from populations with the same survival and that differences are due to chance. Multiple comparisons of the survival curves using pairwise comparisons between RU486 vs. Gel, RU486 vs. NS and Gel vs. NS was also done in Graphpad Prism 7.03. The statistically significant threshold for multiple comparisons was adjusted using the Bonferroni method (Bonferroni-corrected threshold p = 0.017). Log-rank p value was considered significant if p <0.017. Pairwise comparisons of calculated AUC values was done using Bailer’s method (31 (link)) which takes into account interanimal variability and the pooled estimate of variance. Pharmacokinetic data was generally heterogeneous with high coefficient of variation (%CV) for all compartments and timepoints.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical Methods for Microbial Dysbiosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test was used for multi-group comparisons in GraphPad Prism 7.03. Student’s t-test (two-tailed, unpaired) was used for comparison between two groups in GraphPad Prism 7.03. Statistics were done using log-transformed values of at 1 s. Repeated samples collected longitudinally from the same participant were excluded for statistical analysis. Pearson correlation coefficient (two-tailed) was calculated in GraphPad Prism 7.03 for pH, D-LA and total LA versus log10 MSD values for pooled analyses. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive values were calculated for BV diagnosis by Nugent score using 16S rDNA as the reference standard or true diagnosis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Statistical Analysis of TNBC Xenograft Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was carried out with Graphpad Prism 7.03 (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Tube formation, migration, and the metastasis and the survival rates in human TNBC xenografts were analyzed using the two-way ANOVA test of Graphpad Prism 7.03. IHC comparison, western blotting, luciferase activity, and MMP assays were analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test of Graphpad Prism 7.03. Results are presented as the mean ± SD unless otherwise specified. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!