Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

78 protocols using «glass coverslip»

1

Quantifying Mitochondrial Dynamics in Cells

2025
Cells were seeded onto 0.17-mm-thick (no. 1.5) glass coverslips (Warner Instruments) precoated overnight with 60 μg/mL collagen I (Gibco), then fixed using freshly prepared 4% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in PBS for 15 minutes at room temperature, and then washed in PBS. Background Sniper (Biocare Medical) was used to block nonspecific staining, and then anti-TOM20 rabbit mAb (D8T4N, Cell Signaling Technology) was diluted 1:100 in Background Sniper and applied to coverslips overnight at 4°C. Following PBS wash, coverslips were incubated in goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L) highly cross-adsorbed Alexa Fluor Plus 488–conjugated secondary antibody (A32731, Invitrogen) at a dilution of 1:1000 in Background Sniper for 1 hour at room temperature. Coverslips were washed and then counterstained with HCS CellMask Deep Red (Thermo Fisher Scientific; 1:5000 in PBS) and Hoechst 33342 solution (Invitrogen; 1 μg/mL in PBS) for 30 minutes at room temperature. Coverslips were washed and then mounted in Prolong Gold Anti-Fade Mounting Media (Invitrogen) on glass slides and dried overnight.
Imaging of stained cells was conducted with a ×63/1.46 NA oil objective on the Zeiss Laser-point Scanning Microscope (LSM) 880 with Airyscan module for ultra-high-resolution imaging in the Advanced Microscopy Core at MD Anderson Cancer Center. Raw.czi files were processed using the Zen software into deconvoluted Airyscan images and analyzed using CellProfiler (Broad Institute; https://cellprofiler.org/). TOM20 intensity was quantified relative to cell area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Cranial Window Implantation for Cortical Imaging

2024
At the age of 8–12 weeks, a square 3 × 3 mm2 cranial window (no. 1 coverslip glass, Warner Instruments) was placed over the left hemisphere of the cortex contralateral to the deprived eye. Mice were anaesthetized using 5% isofluorane and anaesthesia was maintained with 2–3% isofluorane. A craniotomy matching the size of the coverslip was cut using no. 11 scalpel blades (Fine Science Tools) and the coverslip carefully placed on top of the dura within the craniotomy without excessive compression of the brain. The window was centred using stereotactic coordinates 2 mm lateral and 3 mm posterior from bregma for visual cortex. The window and skull were sealed using dental cement (C&B Metabond, Parkell). A custom-made metal head bar was attached to the skull during surgery for head-fixed imaging. Mice were allowed to recover for 2–3 weeks before two-photon imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Viral Tracing Techniques for Analyzing Mouse Visual Cortex

2024
For all surgical procedures, mice were anesthetized with either isoflurane (0.5%–2%) or a ketamine/xylazine cocktail (100 mg/kg ketamine, 10 mg/kg xylazine) and secured in a stereotaxic frame. For all surgeries, animals were given analgesics (buprenorphine SR, 0.5–1.0 mg/kg, SQ) at the end of the procedure and provided ibuprofen medicated water (0.11 mg/mL). Intracranial injections were guided by stereotaxic coordinates relative to bregma, anterior-posterior (AP), medial-lateral (ML), and dorsal-ventral (DV).
For 2PCI experiments, mice were implanted with a custom-built circular headframe centered over the left hemisphere. Carprofen (5 mg/kg) and dexamethasone (2 mg/kg) were administered prior to craniotomy surgery. A large 3–5 mm craniotomy was drilled centered over V1 in the left hemisphere and AAV1-Syn-Flex-GCaMP6s-WPRE-SV40 (200–250 nL, 9.25e12 GC/ml, UPenn or 150–200 nL, 7.5e12–1.5e13 GC/ml, Addgene #100845) was injected into the middle of V1 (AP = −3.5 mm, ML = −2.65 mm, DV = −0.35 mm).38 (link) Following injections, the craniotomy was covered with a glass coverslip (Warner Instruments) mounted on a custom-built ring and sealed to the rest of the headframe with dental cement. Animals were allowed to recover while the virus was expressed over ~2–3 weeks.
For RVdG tracing experiments, mice were first injected with AAV8-Ef1a-FLEX-GT (Scnn1a: 1.1e11 GC/ml; Nr5a1: 5.4e11 GC/ml; Salk Vector Core; Addgene #26198) and AAV8-CAG-FLEX-oG-WPRE-SV40pA (1.03e13 GC/ml; ViGene; Addgene #74292) mixed 1:2 into the right hemisphere of V1 (AP = −3.4 mm, ML = +2.6 mm, DV = −0.35 mm) at a total volume of 200–250 nL.39 (link),40 (link) AAV2-CAG-H2B-GFP-F2A-oG (2.5e11 GC/ml; Salk Vector Core) was injected into the dLGN of the right hemisphere (AP = −2.10 mm, ML = +2.20 DV = −2.45) at a volume of 50–200 nL. 21 days later, EnvA-RvdG-mCherry (3.15e7 TU/mL; Salk Vector Core) at a total volume of 50–200 nL was injected into the previous V1 craniotomy. RVdG was allowed to express 7–10 days before mice were perfused and brains and retinas removed for histology.
To ensure that our RVdG infected starter neurons were specific to the Nr5a1-Cre or Scnn1a-Tg3-Cre labeled V1 neurons, we did controls where we injected only AAV8-FLEX-GT into V1 followed 21 days later by EnvA-RVdG-mCherry virus and confirmed that our starter cell populations were restricted to V1 only (Figures S3A and S3B). To ensure that none of the injected AAV2-H2B-GFP-F2A-oG spread retrograde to areas that receive and provide input to dLGN, we also injected AAV2-H2B-GFP-F2A-oG alone into the dLGN of control animals and verified expression was limited to the dLGN (Figure S3C). In a separate experiments, two weeks after injecting AAV2-H2B-GFP-F2A-oG into the dLGN, we injected VSVg-RVdG-mCherry (150–200 nL; 1.0E7 TU/ml; Salk Vector Core) into V1 to verify there was no retrograde spread of oG back into V1 which would result in transsynaptic spread to dLGN (Figure S3D).
For a subset of Ai14-crossed mice used in our cell counting analysis, we labeled inhibitory neurons by retro-orbitally injecting AAV-PHP.eB-mdlx-GFP-Fishell-1 into the right eye (50 μl; 6E12 GC/ml; Salk Vector Core; Addgene #83900).41 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Culturing Rat Hippocampal Neurons

2024
We performed experiments on rat cultured hippocampal neurons, with approval for all animal procedures from the Yale University Animal Care and Use Committee. The methods to culture neurons are essentially the same as previously described (Brewer et al., 1993 (link)) and subsequently modified in the Boron laboratory (Chen et al., 2008 (link)). Briefly, a pregnant rat was deeply anesthetized using halothane, prior to cervical dislocation. Rat embryos (18 days) were quickly removed from the uterus and decapitated. Approximately ten brains were collected and placed in filtered HEPES-buffered solution (HBS) containing (in mM): NaCl, 143.7; KCl, 3; and HEPES, 10. Hippocampi were extracted using fine forceps and a scalpel and then exposed to 0.03% (w/v) trypsin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO) dissolved in HBS for 15 min at 37°C. Using flamed Pasteur pipettes with reduced tip diameter, we triturated the tissues to disperse cells. Neurons were plated in neurobasal medium supplemented with B-27 (GIBCO-Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), 10% fetal calf serum (FCS), plus penicillin-streptomycin on poly-L-lysine (MP Biomedical, Irvine, CA) coated glass coverslips (Warner Instruments, Hamden CT, USA) or photoetched grid coverslips (Bellco Biotechnology, Vineland, NJ). After 3–4 h the medium was changed to a similar one without FCS. Neurons cultures were kept in a 5% CO2-air incubator at 37°C for at least seven and up to 61 days (average 23 days).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Characterization of Mouse Slc4a8 and Slc4a10 Transporters

2024
Plasmids. Empty pCMV6-entry plasmid and pCMV6-entry plasmid encoding Mus musculus Slc4a8 Myc-DDK tagged (GenBank Accession no. NM_021530) and Slc4a10 Myc-DDK tagged (transcript variant 5, GenBank Accession no. NM_001242381) were obtained from Origene Technologies Inc. (Rockville, MD 20850, USA).
Cell culture and transfections. CHO-K1 cells (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA) were grown as previously described [11 (link)]. Cells were electroporated (Nucleofector II, Amaxa, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA) with the plasmids mentioned above (4 µg DNA per reaction) using the Nucleofector Kit V (Lonza, Morristown, NJ 07960, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions and then seeded onto 5 mm diameter glass coverslips (Warner Instruments, Holliston, MA 01746, USA). The expression of Slc4a8 and Slc4a10 in CHO-K1 cells resulted in comparable yields: 55.7 ± 4.7% for Slc4a8 and 53.4 ± 4.9% for Slc4a10.
For the immunofluorescence experiments (see methods below), CHO-K1 cells were transfected with 2.5 μg of Slc4a8, Slc4a10 or empty plasmids using the Xfect (Takara, San Jose, CA 95131, USA) transfection reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Immunofluorescence experiments. CHO-K1 cells were trypsinized after transfections and seeded onto 25 mm diameter glass coverslips (Superior Marienfeld, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany). At 24 h after transfection, the cells were incubated for 60 min on ice in complete culture medium supplemented with wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 633 fluorophore (1 μg/mL, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA 02451, USA), followed by cell fixation with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min and methanol for 45 min at −20 °C. The coverslips were air dried and then stored overnight at −80 °C. The next day, cells were blocked with 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA) diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing (in mM): 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 8 Na2HPO4, 2 KH2PO4, at pH 7.4. After blocking, the coverslips were incubated for 1 h at room temperature (RT) with a mouse monoclonal anti-DYKDDDDK antibody (9A3, 1:500 dilution, Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA 01923, USA) followed by three 5 min washings with PBS. Then, the coverslips were incubated for 1 h at RT with goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 (1:1000 Jackson Immunoresearch, West Grove, PA 19390, USA) followed by three washings with PBS. Finally, nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI 1:50,000 dilution, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and mounted using fluorescence mounting medium (Dako, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA).
Images were acquired using a DMi8 Leica spinning disk confocal microscope equipped with a HC PL APO 63x×oil immersion objective (N.A.1.40) and an EMCCD digital camera (iXon Life 888, Andor Technology, Belfast, United Kingdom). Images were captured using SlideBook 6 software (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, CO 80216, USA) and processed with ImageJ software (version 1.54f) [23 (link)].
Intracellular pH, [Cl] and [K+] measurements. The solutions used in this study are shown in Table 1 and Table 2. Functional experiments were conducted 18–20 h after electroporation. The fluorescent ion-sensitive dyes BCECF-AM (2′,7′-Bis-(2-Carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-Carboxyfluorescein, Acetoxymethyl Ester) [24 (link)], PBFI-AM (1,3-benzenedicarboxylic acid, 4,4′-[1,4,10,13-tetraoxa-7,16-diazacyclooctadecane-7,16-diylbis(5-methoxy-6,2-benzofurandiyl)]bis-, tetrakis[(acetyloxy)methyl] ester) [16 (link)] and SPQ (6-methoxy-N-[3-sulfopropyl] quinolinium) [25 (link)] were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific and used for measuring intracellular pH, [K+] and [Cl], respectively.
For intracellular pH measurements, CHO-K1 cells were loaded with 2 μM BCECF-AM for 15 min at 37 °C (95% O2/5% CO2). For intracellular K+ measurements, CHO-K1 cells were loaded with 10 μM PBFI-AM for 80 min at room temperature (95% O2/5% CO2). For intracellular [Cl] measurements, CHO-K1 cells were exposed to a hypotonic loading solution containing 10 mM SPQ as previously described [26 (link)]. Solutions containing HCO3 were gassed with 95% O2/5% CO2. For experiments performed under HCO3-free conditions, solutions were gassed continuously with 100% O2 and supplemented with 20 μM ethoxyzolamide (EZA), a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor.
Imaging experiments were performed using an inverted microscope (Olympus IX71, Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA 18034, USA) equipped with a Polychrome IV Imaging System coupled to a high-speed digital camera (Till Photonics, Victor, NY 14564, USA). Images were acquired by alternate excitation at 490 and 440 nm (BCECF), 340 and 380 nm (PBFI) or excitation at 340 nm (SPQ). Emissions were captured at 530 nm (BCECF) or 510 nm (PBFI and SPQ) using Imaging WorkBench 6.0 software (INDEC BioSystems, Los Altos, CA 94022, USA) or Micromanager 1.4 software [27 (link)]. The temperature of the solutions (listed in Table 1 and Table 2) was kept at 37 °C during the experiments using a CL-100 bipolar temperature controller (Warner Instruments).
Slc4a8 and Slc4a10 dependence on Na+ and K+ concentrations. The dependence of Slc4a8 and Slc4a10 for Na+ and K+ ions was obtained by fitting the normalized Slc4a8 and Slc4a10 activities (flow rates correspond to the slopes obtained by linear regression analysis of the linear response recorded when transitioning from an NMDG-containing external solution to either a Na+ or K+-containing external solution) measured at different [Na+]o and [K+]o to the following Hill function using Origin 8.0 software (OriginLab): RCation=RMin+RMaxRMin×CationnHEC50nH+CationnH
where RCation is the alkalinization rate in response to a reduction in external [Cl] at different [Cation], and RMin and RMax correspond to the minimal and maximal alkalinization rates. EC50 is the concentration required to achieve 50% of the maximal effect and nH is the Hill number.
Molecular dynamics simulations. The cryo-EM structure of the rat Slc4a8 (PDB: 7rtm) with K+ in place of Na+ at the ion coordination pocket was used as input for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. A total of three MD simulations were performed for 100 ns each. They were executed using Desmond v2019-1 [28 ] and OPLS2005 force field [29 (link),30 (link),31 (link)]. The Slc4a8 structure with the K+-CO32− pair at the S1 site was prepared using Protein Preparation Wizard from Maestro suite [32 (link)]. The system was embedded into a pre-equilibrated POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) bilayer membrane model and solvated using the single point charge (SPC) water model. To neutralize the system, Na+/Cl ions were included; NaCl was added at a concentration of 0.15 M. The system was equilibrated for 20 ns in the NPT ensemble. Positional restraints of 1.0 kcal×mol−1×Å−2 were applied to the protein and to the ions placed in coordination sites (K+ and CO32−). Temperature and pressure were kept constant at 300 K and 1.01325 bar, respectively, by coupling to a Nose–Hoover Chain thermostat [33 (link)] and Martyna–Tobias–Klein barostat [34 (link)]. The integration step was set to 2 fs. For MD productive runs, the positional restraints were removed. Each run was performed during 100 ns using an NPγT (semi-isotropic ensemble) with a constant surface tension of 0.0 bar Å. For each trajectory, the root-mean-square deviation (RMSD) values of the backbone atoms were computed using VMD v1.9.4a38 [35 (link)]. The distances between ions and residues were computed using TCL scripting in VMD v1.9.4a38 [35 (link)].
Sequence alignment. Multiple sequence alignment was performed using Clustal Omega [36 (link)]. Sequences were retrieved from the UniProtKB database and correspond to mouse Slc4a8 (code: Q8JZR6), rat Slc4a8 (code: F1LUB7) and mouse Slc4a10 (code: Q5DTL9).
Statistical analysis. Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM), where n corresponds to the number of experiments per condition. Data were obtained from at least three independent electroporations (or transfections for immunolocalization studies) per condition. Statistical significance was determined using Student’s t test and one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Bonferroni’s post hoc test. p values of less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Origin 8.0 Software was used for statistical calculations (OriginLab, Northampton, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.