Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Aptes

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, China, Sweden, Canada, Austria, Japan, Switzerland, Sao Tome and Principe, Brazil, Australia, Poland, Israel, Italy, France, Singapore
About the product

APTES is a silane-based chemical compound that is commonly used as a coupling agent in various applications. It is a colorless, viscous liquid with the chemical formula (CH3CH2O)3Si(CH2)3NH2. APTES is known for its ability to form covalent bonds between inorganic materials, such as glass or metal, and organic molecules, making it a valuable tool in surface modification and adhesion enhancement.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

3-Aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) is a commercially available silane coupling agent used to modify surface properties of materials like glass, metals, and polymers. It contains a primary amine group and three ethoxy groups, enabling covalent attachment to substrates. APTES is commonly employed in surface functionalization, adhesion promotion, and biomolecule immobilization applications.

APTES is manufactured and sold by multiple suppliers, including Merck Group, Sigma-Aldrich, and Thermo Fisher Scientific. Pricing information is not provided in the available sources.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

Product FAQ

614 protocols using «aptes»

1

Serotonin and Dopamine Biosensing with Aptamers

2025
Reagents including acetone (99.5%), ethanol (99.5%), sodium hydroxide (NaOH, 200 mM in Milli-Q water), and 3-aminopropyltriethoxysilane (APTES) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO, USA). Bis(sulfosuccinimidyl)suberate (BS3) and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA) and prepared at 10 mM in PBS as cross-linkers. Serotonin- and dopamine-binding aptamers were synthesized by Fasmac Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. The aptamer concentrations (1800 ppm) were prepared in PBS or artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF). Surface-blocking reagent ethanolamine-HCl was purchased from GE Healthcare (Chicago, IL, USA) and diluted to 0.1 M in Milli-Q water for use. Serotonin and dopamine solutions were prepared in PBS or aCSF at various concentrations (100 ppt to 1000 ppb for serotonin). For the ion measurements, a calcium ion-selective membrane solution was prepared from Polyvinyl chloride (PVC), bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DOS), sodium ionophore II, and sodium tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate, dissolved in tetrahydrofuran (THF). Polyvinyl chloride was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan. DOS and sodium ionophore II were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. PDMS (SYLGARD184) was purchased from Sansho Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Reinforced Polypropylene Nonwoven Fabric

2025
The rCF wet-laid nonwoven fabric prepared in this study was composed of rCFs (6 mm, Catack-H, Hwaseong, Republic of Korea) as the reinforcement and PP fibers (6 mm, Nycontech, Asan, Republic of Korea) as the matrix. Moreover, 3-aminoproplytriethoxysilane (APTES, 98%, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used for the rCF surface treatment and as a binding additive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

PDMS Surface Functionalization with Acylase

2025
Prior to coating, the PDMS samples were previously washed with 0.5% (w/v) sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS, Sigma-Aldrich) for 30 min, and afterwards, they were rinsed alternately with distilled H2O and 96% EtOH and dried with a flow of air. To enhance enzyme attachment, amino groups were introduced onto the surface of the PDMS stripes by pre-treating them with a 5% (v/v) solution of amino-propyl-tri-ethoxy-silane (APTES, Sigma-Aldrich) (Figure 2a). To confirm the presence of the amino groups onto the surface, the stripes were immersed into a ninhydrin solution (2% (w/v), Sigma-Aldrich). The APTES-treated PDMS stripes were coated with acylase by dipping them in 1 mg·mL−1 acylase solution in tricine buffer pH 8, for 10 min. After acylase deposition, the stripes were subjected to a 10-min rinsing step in 0.15 M sodium chloride (NaCl) solution at pH 8. The samples were dried with a continuous flow of air (flow chamber).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Fabrication of rGO-FET Biosensors

2025
The rGO-FET biosensors were fabricated on silicon dioxide (SiO2) wafers, following methods in the previous research [52 (link)]. Six rectangular patterns (50 μm × 100 μm each) in a vertical parallel line covering patterned GO on both sides with gold electrodes were produced by meniscus-dragging deposition (MDD) for GO deposition, the reduction of GO, photolithography, reactive ion etching (RIE), e-beam evaporation, and the lift-off process. After applying O2 plasma (CUTE, Femto Science, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea) at 50 W and 50 sccm for 50 s, a 1:19 ratio of 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and 99% ethyl alcohol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were used to treat the surface of the SiO2 wafer to create appropriate conditions for the deposition of GO. The MDD method was used to deposit GO on the treated SiO2 wafers. After the deposition of GO, 57wt% of hydriodic acid (Sigma-Aldrich Inc.) was used for 2 h 30 min at 80 °C for thermal reduction to obtain electrical conductivity. Photolithography, Mask Aligner (MDA-400S, Midas System, Daejeon, Republic of Korea) was utilized for the photoresist (GXR 601, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), deposited by spin coating on a reduced stock/flake GO wafer to obtain the proper pattern. AZ 300 MIF (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) was used to develop the solution, and the light-absorbed area on the wafer was removed. The PR on the pattern and the remaining rGO, other than the pattern, were removed by RIE using oxygen gas. PR coating and photolithography were processed to perform electrode patterning. Development was applied to remove the PR from the electrode patterned area. Then, the Au source was evaporated in 2000 Å in 2 Å/s, to deposit itself by e-beam evaporator (ULVAC, MA, USA) onto the entire wafer. Finally, an acetone wash was performed to remove the Au deposited on the wafer beside the electrode region. The photograph and detailed dimensions of the fabricated sensor are shown in Figure S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Functionalization and Characterization of Amyloid Fibrils

2025
Silicon wafers (P-Type/Boron, ⟨100⟩,
380 μm) (UniversityWafer Inc.) diced into 1 cm × 1 cm pieces
were cleaned by sequential ultrasonication in acetone (AR grade, Sigma-Aldrich,
NZ), ethanol (AR grade, Sigma-Aldrich, NZ), and Milli-Q water for
15 min each. The cleaned and N2 dried wafers were functionalized
to improve protein adhesion by submerging them for 30 min in 2% v/v
(3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) (Sigma-Aldrich, NZ) in toluene
(AR grade, Sigma-Aldrich, NZ). The treated wafers were rinsed by ultrasonication
in toluene, acetone, ethanol, and Milli-Q water for 15 min each, as
described previously. 100 μL of the fibril solution (prepared
through incubation for 7 days, 30 mg/mL) was deposited on the treated
wafer and incubated for 1 h before being rinsed with 150 μL
of Milli-Q water and N2 dried. Samples were secured on
a steel puck (TED PELLA) using epoxy glue (Tarzan’s Grip, NZ).
Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) in tapping mode was used to visualize
the fibrils deposited on the samples. The imaging was performed with
a Cypher ES Instrument (Oxford Instruments, United States) using Tap150AL-G
probes (Budget Sensors, Bulgaria), at three random spots per sample.
The obtained height images were processed with the Asylum Research
Software AR16 (Version:16.10.211) to apply an XY plane fit and to
measure the average diameter of the fibrils (calculated from three
random fibrils per height image for a sample size of 9).
Additionally,
to demonstrate that the fibrils in solution can align themselves in
the direction of applied shear forces, 150 μL of a diluted (3
mg/mL) fibril solution was allowed to flow diagonally with gravity
across an APTES functionalized silicon wafer, followed by rinsing
and drying, as mentioned above. The wafer was then imaged in tapping
mode under the same conditions as above. On the same silicon wafer,
another 150 μL of the dilute fibril solution was applied and
allowed to flow perpendicular to the initial drop. The surface was
rinsed again and dried before being imaged by AFM, as described previously.
PFM was performed on the prepared fibrils (Cypher ES, Oxford Instruments)
using conductive ElectriAll-In-One probes (Budget Sensors, Bulgaria),
selecting the cantilever with a nominal spring constant of 2.7 N/m
(unwanted cantilever broken off). The cantilever was calibrated by
performing a force curve and a thermal noise analysis on a silicon
wafer to obtain the inverse optical lever sensitivity (invOLS) and
spring constant, respectively.35 (link) Single-frequency
PFM in contact mode was performed to detect the out-of-plane, Deffective, piezoelectric response. The set point was set to
−0.5 V and was adjusted if needed. The PFM scans were performed
at frequencies of ∼50 kHz for off-resonance imaging and at
∼500 kHz for the on-resonance imaging.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «aptes»

1

High-speed AFM Imaging of CRISPR-Cas9 Complexes

The laboratory-built high-speed AFM was used in the tapping mode31 (link). The cantilever deflection was detected with an optical beam deflection detector, on which a 0.7 mW, 780 nm infrared laser was mounted. The infrared laser beam was focused onto the back side of the cantilever (Olympus: BL-AC7DS-KU4) through a ×60 objective lens (Nikon: CFI S Plan Fluor ELWD 60×). The reflected laser from the cantilever was detected with a two-segmented PIN photodiode. The spring constant of the cantilever was ~100 pN nm−1. The resonant frequency and the quality factor of the cantilever in liquid were ~800 kHz and ~2, respectively. An amorphous carbon tip was fabricated on the original AFM tip by electron beam deposition (EBD). The length of the additional AFM tip was ~500 nm, and the radius of the apex of the tip was ~4 nm. The free oscillation amplitude of the cantilever was ~1 nm and the set-point amplitude was set to 90% of the free amplitude. For HS-AFM observations of Cas9, a mica surface was treated for 3 min with 0.011% (3-aminopropyl)triethoxysilane (APTES) (Sigma-Aldrich). The complex of Cas9, RNA and DNA was pre-assembled (Cas9:RNA:DNA = 1:1:1 mole ratio) in AFM-imaging buffer. HS-AFM observations of apo-Cas9 and Cas9–RNA were performed in buffer, consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 100 mM KCl and 0.01 mM EDTA. HS-AFM observations of the Cas9–RNA–DNA and GFP-dCas9–RNA–DNA complexes were performed in buffer, consisting of 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 30 mM KCl and 0.01 mM EDTA. All HS-AFM experiments were performed at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Nanoimprint Lithography Protocol for Sensor Fabrication

The nanoimprint lithography mold was
purchased from the Institute
for Microelectronics Stuttgart, Germany. The optical masks used for
all photolithography processes were purchased from Delta Masks Enschede,
the Netherlands. SOI wafers were purchased from Soitec, France, and
were cut into 100 mm wafers at the Catholic University of Louvain,
Belgium. Thermoresists, photoresists, and other chemicals such as
H2SO4, 1% HF, and 25% TMAH were purchased from
MicroChemicals GmbH, Germany. APTES and GPTES were purchased from
Sigma Aldrich, Germany. The nanoimprint lithography, photolithography
processes, and other measurements were carried out at the University
of Applied Sciences Kaiserslautern, Campus Zweibruecken. A Keithley
4200 semiconductor parameter analyzer from Tektronix, GmbH was used
for electrical measurements in a three-electrode configuration. Ag/AgCl
reference electrodes (DRIREF-450) were bought from World Precision
Instruments. For pH measurements 10 mM PB was prepared by mixing disodium
hydrogenphosphate (Na2HPO4) and sodium hypophosphate
(NaH2PO4) salts in DI water to obtain solutions
of different pH values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

AFM Analysis of DNA-HCc3 Complex

Atomic force microscopy analysis of the DNA–HCc3 complex was done by using 3-aminopropyl-triethoxysilane (APTES) vapor-treated mica (AP-mica) for sample immobilization (31 (link)), with minor modifications to the procedure. With the vapor method, 30 μl of APTES (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was placed at the bottom of a 1.5-ml Eppendorf tube. The tube cap was closed for 10 min at room temperature to create an APTES atmosphere. A piece of freshly cleaved mica (0.8 × 0.8 cm2; Muscovite mica, V-1; Electron Microscopy Science, Fort Washington, PA, USA), kept from contact with the APTES solution, was placed in the APTES containing tube with the cap closed. The mica was then incubated at room temperature for 2 h.
Samples for examination were prepared by mixing DNA and HCc3 at appropriate dimer/bp molar ratios in the AFM buffer (20 mM Tris–Cl at pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 100 mM NaCl and 10 mM EDTA) and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The final concentration of DNA was ∼5 ng/μl. Ten microliters (10 μl) of sample was dropped onto the AP-mica and was incubated for 10 min at room temperature. After adsorption, the mica was washed thoroughly in deionized water (18.2 MΩ cm; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA), blotted at the edge, and dried with compressed nitrogen.
All samples were stored temporarily in a desiccator before AFM imaging. Imaging was carried out on a NanoScope IV STM/AFM (Digital Instruments, Santa Barbara, CA, USA) in the Tapping-Mode using the commercially available Tapping-mode Etched Silicon Probe (TESP; Veeco Instruments Inc., Plainview, NY USA). Images were analyzed with the program WsXM 4.0 Develop 7.0 Scanning Probe Microscopy Software (Nanotec Electronica, Madrid, Spain; http://www.nanotec.es).
With the AFM conditions we used, free DNA molecules present the average contour length of 0.926 μm (SD 0.107 μm; n = 39), which matched the expected length of a linear 2.8 kb DNA (0.924 μm for 0.33 nm/bp). Their average height was ∼0.65 nm (SD 0.15 nm; n = 173). This is consistent with the reported values for AFM measurement of DNA (∼0.44–1.0 nm) (32 (link),33 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Optimized AFM Imaging of Chromatin Fibers

AFM imaging was performed by AC-mode in air with 60% humidity using Molecular Imaging 5500 AFM (Molecular Imaging, Agilent Technologies). The AFM probe used in all the measurements is silicon AFM probes (Taq300, Budget Sensors). In order to estimate the tip-induced-width-increase in width measurement, we imaged lambda-phage DNA (Fermentas) on 0.1% glutaraldehyde mica surface using three different AFM probes. Based on statistics from more than 30 line scans for 10 different DNA molecules, the DNA was measured to have a half-maximum-height-width of 11.8 ± 0.8 nm and a height of 0.7 ± 0.1 nm. Considering that the realistic DNA width is around 2 nm, this result suggests that there is an about 10-nm tip-induced-width-increase. This tip induced width increase was subtracted from all the measured values of chromatin and DNA. To estimate the width of nucleosomes in chromatin fibers reconstituted from pure histone octamers or assembled in Xenopus egg extracts, line scans for at least 20 nucleosomes in each type of chromatin fiber were used to estimate the average width and the standard deviation. Finally, more than 100 line-scans for the higher order chromatins obtained in the direct AFM imaging method under fixed condition were used to measure the width and standard deviation. The images in Tiff format were prepared by freeware Gwyddion.
Two kinds of surfaces used in chromatin imaging are glutaraldehyde-coated mica improved from the protocol described in (Wang, et al. 2002 (link)) and streptavidin coated mica or glass surface. The streptavidin coated surface was prepared by the following standard procedure: 1) cleaned glass or mica surface was first sinalized by APTES (Sigma) followed by coating with glutaraldehyde (Sigma), 2) 0.02 mg/ml streptavidin (Sigma) in 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS) was incubated on the above surface for eight hours at 24°C, 3) the streptavidin coated surface was passivated with 0.5 M etholamine (Sigma) for one hour at 24°C and then stored in 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma) at 4°C. Before use, the streptavidin coated surface was rinsed by 5 ml 1x PBS to remove the excess BSA.
To attach DNA to the streptavidin coated surface, one end of lambda-phage DNA (Fermentas) was ligated to a biotinylated oligo (Sigma) with T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs). 50 μl of such DNA (9 ng/μl) was incubated on a ~ 1 cm2 streptavidin coated glass surface at 24 °C for 30 minutes. The surface was then washed for three times using buffer solution. Reconstituted 12-mer nucleosome arrays were the generous gift of Assistant Professor CA Davey (Nanyang Technological University).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Single-Molecule Manipulation Experiments

The single-molecule manipulation experiments were carried out using a custom high-force magnetic tweezers platform that can exert forces up to 100 pN with ∼1 nm extension resolution for stuck bead at 200 Hz sampling rate37 (link).
For given magnets and bead, the force is solely dependent on the magnet-bead distance F(d), which can be calibrated based on a method described in our previous publication, which has an ∼10% uncertainty due to the heterogeneous bead sizes37 (link). On the basis of the calibrated F(d), multiple ways of force control were achieved by changing d with time accordingly. A constant force is achieved when a constant d is maintained. For loading rate control where force increases linearly with time, F(t)=r × t, the magnet-bead distance is programmed to change with time as d(t)=F−1(r × t), where F−1 is the inverse function of F(d) and r is the loading rate.
For the unfolding experiments, the protein of interest was immobilized on the glass coverslip of a laminar flow chamber and to a 3-μm paramagnetic bead (Dynabeads M270 streptavidin) using Halo-tag/Halo-ligand and biotin/streptavidin chemistry6 (link)38 (link) (Fig. 1d). Briefly, glass coverslip was cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaner in 10% Decon 90 solution, followed by actetone and isopropanol for 30 min each. Then the coverslips was silianized by 1% APTES (Sigma-Aldrich) in methanol for 20 min and rinsed clean by methanol. The APTES-coated coverslip was assembled into a flow channel and NH2-O4-Halotag ligand (Promega) was immobilized on to the coverslip through glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) crosslinking. The channel was blocked by 1 M Tris (pH 7.4) for 30 min followed by 1% BSA in 1 × PBS and 0.1% Tween-20 over night. Protein of interest containing Halo-tag and biotinylated Avi-tag was immobilized by flowing ∼0.1 μg ml−1 protein into the channel for 20 min. And then streptavidin-coated M270 beads were added to the channel to form the tether.
For the refolding rate measurement, a 576-bp DNA linker was incorporated between the protein and the magnetic bead. This reduced the potential effects of steric hindrance of the magnetic beads on the protein-refolding rates. In this case, a 576-bp DNA from lambda phage vector was amplified by PCR with a Thio-labelled 5′ primer and biotin-labelled 5′ primer. The 576-bp DNA was covalently immobilized to epoxy-activated 3 μm paramagnetic beads following the manufacturer's instructions (Dynabeads M270-epoxy). The concentration of DNA during incubation was kept low (∼0.01 ng μl−1) to minimize multiple binding on a single bead. During the experiments, the talin construct of interest was immobilized to a glass coverslip using halo-tag chemistry. The buffer was then switched to one containing 0.02 mg ml−1 streptavidin for 20 min followed by incubation with the DNA-coated paramagnetic beads. The multivalent streptavidin acted as a bridge that linked the DNA handle to talin. All unfolding and refolding experiments were carried out in 1 × PBS, 1% BSA , 1 mM dithiothreitol and 0.1% Tween-20.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.