Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Bovine serum albumin (bsa)

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Canada, China, Belgium, France, Italy, Japan, Australia, Netherlands, Switzerland, Lithuania, Sweden, New Zealand, Macao, Austria, Spain, Morocco, Denmark, Panama, Portugal, India, Ireland, Poland, Finland, Israel, Hungary, Sao Tome and Principe
About the product

Bovine serum albumin is a common laboratory-grade protein used in various biological applications. It is derived from bovine (cattle) blood serum and serves as a stabilizing agent, blocking buffer, and nutrient supplement in cell culture, biochemical assays, and other research procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) is actively commercialized by Thermo Fisher Scientific and available through authorized distributors. Prices vary depending on the specific product and quantity, ranging from $66.70 for a 25 mL solution at 1 mg/mL concentration to $98.60 for a 50 mL solution.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

6 175 protocols using «bovine serum albumin (bsa)»

1

Single-cell RNA-seq of Mouse Liver Tissue

2025
The mice were humanly euthanized at 36 hours after PHx. Liver tissue samples were collected for examination. Fresh mouse liver tissue was collected and divided into two portions: one for single-cell dissociation and the other stored at 4°C in magnetic-activated cell sorting (MACS) tissue preservation solution (130-100-008) for nuclei preparation. To synchronize the completion of both suspensions, single-cell dissociation was initiated first using an enzymatic solution containing Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), 0.04% bovine serum albumin (BSA), 0.2% collagenase II (Gibco), and deoxyribonuclease I (100 μg/liter; AppliChem). The tissue was rinsed with precooled medium, minced, and digested at 37°C with shaking for about 30 min, followed by the addition of 0.25% trypsin (Gibco) for another 5 min. The resulting suspension was filtered through a 40-μm cell strainer and centrifuged at 300g for 7 min at 4°C. RBCs were lysed using the MACS Red Cell Lysis Solution (130-094-183), and the cell pellet was resuspended in 100 to 200 μl of PBS with 1% BSA. Cell counts and viability were assessed using a Luna Fluorometer (Logos Biosystems), adjusting the concentration to 700 to 1200 cells/μl. Nuclei preparation began after centrifugation, with the tissue rinsed and lysed on ice with precooled NST buffer (0.1% NP-40, 10 mM tris-HCl, etc.) for 3 to 5 min. The nuclear suspension was filtered and centrifuged at 500g for 10 min, washed with a wash buffer, and centrifuged again. Nuclei were resuspended in 100 μl of PBS with 1% BSA and stained with Trypan blue for counting, adjusting the concentration to 700 to 1200 nuclei/μl. scRNA-seq was conducted using the MobiCube High-throughput Single Cell 3′ Transcriptome Kit V2.1 (PN-S050200301) and the MobiNova-100 microfluidic platform. The single-cell suspension was promptly loaded for microdroplet formation, followed by reverse transcription, cDNA amplification, and library construction according to the manufacturer’s protocol, with high-throughput sequencing performed in paired-end 150–base pair mode. For data preprocessing, FASTQ files were processed and aligned to the human reference genome GRCh38 using Cell Ranger software (version 8.0.1), aggregating UMI counts for each barcode. The UMI count matrix was analyzed with Seurat (version 4.0.0), applying criteria to filter out low-quality cells and potential multiplets, including removing cells with fewer than 200 genes or 1000 UMIs, and excluding cells with high mitochondrial or hemoglobin gene expression. Potential doublets were identified with the Doublet Finder package (version 2.0.3). Library size normalization was executed with the “Normalize Data” function using the “Log Normalize” method. The top 2000 highly variable genes were identified using “Find Variable Genes,” and dimensionality reduction was performed using principal components analysis. Cells were clustered on the basis of gene expression profiles and visualized with UMAP. Marker genes were identified with “Find All Markers,” and DEGs were determined using “FindMarkers,” applying thresholds of P < 0.05 and |log2 fold change| > 0.58. Gene Ontology enrichment and KEGG pathway analyses of DEGs were conducted using R (version 4.0.3) based on hypergeometric distribution. The scRNA-seq in this study was supported by Shanghai OE Biotech Co. Ltd.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Immunocytochemistry and Immunohistochemistry Protocols

2025
For immunocytochemistry, cells were fixed with 4% PFA for 15 min at RT and then washed with PBS three times before being permeabilized in 0.5% Triton X-100 (Sigma Aldrich, Cat# T8787) in TBS (pH 7.6) for 15 min at RT. Next, the cells were blocked with 10% bovine serum albumin (Gibco) in PBS for 30 min at RT. Nuclei were stained with 4’,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma‒Aldrich) or hoechst (Sigma‒Aldrich). Digital images were obtained with a ZEISS Axio Scope A1 upright microscope. Relative GFP ratio was calculated as GFP/mScarlet signals via ImageJ software, which was then standardized by WT group.
For immunohistochemistry, the rd1 mice were euthanized 4 weeks after subretinal injection. Enucleated eyes were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde overnight at 4 °C, dehydrated through an ethanol series and xylene, and then embedded in paraffin. The retinal sections were incubated in blocking buffer for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary anti-rhodopsin antibody (Abcam, Car# ab221664,1:500) or anti-Cas9 antibody (Cell Signaling Technology, Car#65832) at 4 °C overnight. After washing with PBS three times, the sections were incubated with Alexa Fluor 594-conjugated goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody (Invitrogen, Car# A-11012,1:500) for 2 h at room temperature. Nuclei were stained using DAPI (Sigma‒Aldrich, Cat# D9542,1:10000), and sections were mounted with Canada balsam (Sigma‒Aldrich). Images were viewed under an Olympus IX83 microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Isolation and Analysis of Lung Tumors in KP Mice

2025
For the isolation of tumor-bearing lungs from KP mice, mice were anesthetized, perfused with PBS as described, and 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA; Fisher Scientific) was added to the lungs via intratracheal instillation. Lungs were then removed, placed in 4% PFA overnight at 4°C, and stored in 70% ethanol prior to processing. The fixed lung tissue was then paraffin embedded at the UCSD Histology and Immunohistochemistry Core at The Sanford Consortium for Regenerative Medicine according to standard protocols, and 5 μm sections were obtained. Paraffin embedded tissues were then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a 100%, 95%, 70%, 50%, and 30% ethanol series. For immunohistochemistry, endogenous peroxidase was quenched in 3% hydrogen peroxide (Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at room temperature prior to antigen retrieval. Antigen retrieval was performed for 30 min in 95–100 °C 1× citrate buffer, pH 6.0 (eBioscience). Sections were blocked in TBS (Tris buffered saline) or PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% goat or donkey serum (Sigma-Aldrich), and 5% bovine serum albumin. For single-cell suspensions of lung epithelia or lung tumors, LinEpCAM+ cells were isolated via FACS in the manner described previously. Cells were resuspended in DMEM:F12 (Fisher Scientific) supplemented with 50% FBS and adhered to slides by centrifugation at 500 rpm. Twenty-four hours later, cells were fixed in 4% PFA (Fisher Scientific), washed in PBS, and blocked with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 (Sigma-Aldrich), 10% Goat serum (Fisher Scientific), and 5% bovine serum albumin (Invitrogen).
All incubations with primary antibodies were carried out overnight at 4°C. For immunofluorescence staining, incubation with Alexafluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes) was performed for 1 hr at room temperature. DAPI (Molecular Probes) was used to detect DNA and images were obtained with a Confocal Leica TCS SP5 II (Leica Microsystems). For immunohistochemical staining, incubation with biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Laboratories) was performed for 45 min at 20–25°C. Vectastain ABC HRP Kit (Vector Laboratories) was used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. The following primary antibodies were used: chicken anti-GFP (Abcam, ab13970; 1:200), rabbit anti-Msi2 (Abcam, ab76148; clone EP1305Y, 1:500), rabbit anti-SPC (Santa Cruz, sc-13979; clone FL-197, 1:100), and goat anti-CC10 (Santa Cruz, sc-9773; clone S-20, 1:200). Whole slide imaging was used to determine the number of tumors, tumor burden, and tumor grade in the tumor-bearing lungs of KP mice. H&E-stained slides were scanned using Aperio AT2 digital whole slide scanning (Leica Biosystems), and tumor analysis was performed using ImageScope (Aperio). Tumor grade was scored according to the criteria described by Jackson et al., 2005 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Immunophenotyping of Murine Hematopoietic Cells

2025
BM or spleen cells (3 × 106 cells) after red blood cell (RBC) lysis were stained with fixable viability dye eFluor-501 (eBioscience) at the concentration of 1:1,000 for 30 min (4 °C). Subsequently, the cells were washed with PBS supplemented with 0.5% BSA (Wisent) and incubated with anti-CD16/32 (clone 93, eBioscience, 1:200) at a concentration of 1:100 in PBS or 0.5% BSA at 4 °C for 10 min except for myeloid progenitor and downstream progenitor staining. The following antibodies were then used for staining: anti-Ter-119 (clone Ter119, 1:100), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70, 1:100), anti-CD5 (clone 53-7.3, 1:100), anti-CD4 (clone RM4-5, 1:100), anti-CD8a (clone 53-6.7, 1:100), anti-CD45R (clone RA3-6B2, 1:100) and anti-Ly6G/C (clone RB6-8C5, 1:100) (all were biotin conjugated and BD Bioscience), added for 30 min at 4 °C. Cells were subsequently washed with PBS or 0.5% BSA. For staining of LKSs, HSCs and MPPs, streptavidin–APC-Cy7 (eBioscience, 1:100), anti-c-Kit–APC (clone 2B8, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-Sca-1–PE-Cy7 (clone D7, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD150 eFluor-450 (clone mShad150, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD48-PerCP-eFluor-710 (clone HM48-1, BD Bioscience, 1:100), anti-Flt3–PE (clone A2F10.1, BD Bioscience, 1:100) and anti-CD34–FITC (clone RAM34, eBioscience, 1:100) were added and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. For staining of myeloid and lymphoid progenitors, streptavidin–APC-Cy7 (eBioscience, 1:100), anti-c-Kit–APC (clone 2B8, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-Sca-1–PE-Cy7 (clone D7, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD34–FITC (clone RAM34, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD16/32-PerCP-eFluor-710 (clone 93, eBioscience, 1:100) and anti-CD127 BV786 (clone SB/199, BD Bioscience, 1:100) or anti-CD127-BV605 (clone A7R34, BioLegend, 1:100) were added and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. For cMoPs and downstream progenitors: BM cells were incubated with biotin antibodies against lineage markers as mentioned above, except we included anti-Ly6G (clone 1 A8-Ly6G) to replace anti-Ly6C/6G at 4 °C for 30 min. Cells were subsequently washed with PBS or 0.5% BSA. The following antibodies were added: streptavidin–BUV395 (BD Bioscience, 1:50), anti-c-Kit–Pacific Blue (clone 2B8, BD Bioscience, 1:100), anti-Sca-1–PE-Cy7 (clone D7, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD34–FITC (clone RAM34, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD16/32-PerCP-efluor-710 (clone 93, eBioscience, 1:100), anti-CD115 BV711 (clone AFS98, BioLegend, 1:100), anti-Flt3–PE (clone A2F10.1, BD Bioscience, 1:100), anti-Ly6C–APC (clone HK1.4, eBioscience, 1:100) and anti-Ly6G AF700 (clone 1 A8-Ly6G, eBioscience, 1:100), and incubated at 4 °C for 30 min. In another set of experiments, cells were fixed and permeabilized using the FOXP3 Transcription Factor Staining Kit (eBioscience) for 1 h at 4 °C. Then, cells were stained with anti-Ki67–PE (clone 16A8, BioLegend, 1:400) for 1 h at 4 °C and acquired.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Dengue and Flavivirus Serological Assessment

2025
Human sera were subjected to DENV‐2 E Immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, as previously described [35 (link)]) to test for the presence of DENV‐2 E IgG antibodies to determine flavivirus serostatus. Nunc Maxisorp 96‐well plates (ThermoFisher) were coated overnight with 20 ng/well of native DENV‐2 E antigen (Native Antigen). Plates were then blocked for 1 h with 1× PBST supplemented with 1% BSA (ThermoFisher) and then washed three times with 1× PBST. Serum samples (1:400) were added and incubated for 2 h at room temperature, followed by three washes to remove unbound antibody. Plates were then incubated with HRP‐conjugated anti‐Human IgG (ThermoFisher), according to the manufacturer's instructions. The plates were washed three more times with 1× PBST, followed by the addition of the 1‐Step TMB substrate and incubated in the dark for 10 min. Absorbance was measured using an ELISA reader (Diasource) at 450 nm, with a reference wavelength of 650, as previously described [35 (link)].
Subsequently, NS1‐based IgG ELISAs, as previously described [35 (link)], were performed to determine the seropositivity rates against DENV1–4, ZIKV, YFV, and WNV among the DENV‐2 E IgG‐positive serum samples. Similar to DENV‐2 E‐based ELISA, 96‐well plates were individually coated with 20 ng/well of native DENV1–4, ZIKV, YFV, or WNV NS1 proteins (Native Antigen), blocked, washed, and incubated with serum samples (1:400). Bound serum IgGs were detected using an HRP‐conjugated anti‐Human IgG, followed by additional washes and treatment with 1‐Step TMB ELISA substrate (ThermoFisher) Absorbance was measured at 450 nm, with a reference wavelength of 650, as previously described [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «bovine serum albumin (bsa)»

1

High-Throughput Microbial Community Profiling

Extracted DNA from the 0.2–3 µm size-fraction was amplified in three independent 50 µL aliquots per domain using full-length 454 primers. PCR reactions contained: 1X HF buffer (NEB), 200 µM of each dNTP (Feldan Bio), 0.4 mg/mL BSA (Fermentas), 0.2 µM of each 454 primer (Invitrogen), 1 U of Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase (NEB), and 1–3 µL of template DNA. Three separate DNA concentrations were used for each sample: 1/0.5/0.1X for Bacteria and Eukarya; and between 3X and 0.1X for Archaea that represent the smallest proportion of microbial biomass in the Beaufort [18] . Cycling conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation at 98°C for 30 s, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 98°C for 10 s, annealing at 55°C for 30 s, extension at 72°C for 30 s, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The triplicate reactions for the separate domains were pooled, purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN), and quantified spectrophotometrically (Nanodrop ND-1000). The 11 sample-coded amplicons were mixed in equal quantity and 1/8th plate for each domain was sequenced on a Roche 454 GS-FLX Titanium platform at the McGill University/Génome-Québec Innovation Centre for Bacteria and at the IBIS/Université Laval Plate-forme d'Analyses Génomiques for Archaea and Eukaryotes. The raw pyrosequencing reads have been deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive with accession number SRA029114 and a “Minimal Information about a MARKer gene Sequence” (MIMARKS) compliant table is included with the data and given here in Table S3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Isolation and Quantification of miRNA Targets

HCT116 or K562 cells (1×106) were transfected in triplicate with Bi-miR-34a or Bi-cel-miR-67 (Dharmacon) as described above and then cultured in six-well plates. Twenty-four hours later, the cells from 3 wells were pelleted at 500×g. After washing twice with PBS, cell pellets were resuspended in 0.7 ml lysis buffer (20 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 100 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.3% NP-40, 50 U of RNase OUT (Invitrogen), complete mini-protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science)), and incubated on ice for 5 min. The cytoplasmic lysate was isolated by centrifugation at 10,000×g for 10 min. Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads (Invitrogen) were blocked for 2 hr at 4°C in lysis buffer containing 1 mg/ml yeast tRNA and 1 mg/ml BSA (Ambion) and washed twice with 1 ml lysis buffer. Cytoplasmic lysate was added to the beads and incubated for 4 h at 4°C before the beads were washed five times with 1 ml lysis buffer. RNA bound to the beads (pull-down RNA) or from 10% of the extract (input RNA), was isolated using Trizol LS reagent (Invitrogen). The level of mRNA in the Bi-miR-34a or Bi-cel-miR-67 control pull-down was quantified by qRT-PCR or mRNA microarray. For qRT-PCR, mRNA levels were normalized to a housekeeping gene (GAPDH, SDHA or UBC). The enrichment ratio of the control-normalized pull-down RNA to the control-normalized input levels was then calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Hi-C Chromatin Conformation Capture Protocol

Except for the ligation step, Hi-C was performed essentially as described in Lieberman-Aiden et al. [15 (link)], with some modifications.
Thirty to 50 million cells were fixed in 2 % formaldehyde for 10 min, quenched with 0.125 M glycine, spun down (400 × g, 5 min) and washed once with phosphate-buffered saline. The cells were incubated in 50 ml permeabilization buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 8, 10 mM NaCl, 0.2 % Igepal CA-630, Complete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail [Roche]) for 30 min on ice with occasional agitation, spun down (650 × g, 5 min, 4 °C), and the cell pellets were resuspended in 358 μl of 1.25× NEBuffer2 (NEB) per 5 million cell aliquot. We added 11 μl of 10 % SDS to each aliquot, followed by an incubation at 37 °C for 60 min with continuous agitation (950 rpm). To quench the SDS, 75 μl of 10 % Triton X-100 was then added per aliquot, followed by an incubation at 37 °C for 60 min with continuous agitation (950 rpm). To digest chromatin, 1500 U of HindIII (NEB) was added per aliquot and incubated at 37 °C overnight with continuous agitation (950 rpm). After digestion, restriction sites were filled in with Klenow (NEB) in the presence of biotin-14-dATP (Life Technologies), dCTP, dGTP and dTTP (all 30 μM) for 60 min at 37 °C.
For in-solution ligation, 86 μl of 10 % SDS was added per aliquot and incubated at 65 °C for 30 min with continuous agitation (950 rpm), followed by addition of 7.61 ml of ligation mix (745 μl of 10 % Triton X-100, 820 μl of 10× T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer [NEB], 82 μl of 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin [NEB] and 5.965 ml water) per aliquot and incubation at 37 °C for 60 min with occasional agitation. For in-nucleus ligation, 7.61 ml of ligation mix (820 μl of 10× T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer [NEB], 82 μl of 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin [NEB] and 6.71 ml water) was added per aliquot (compared with the in-solution ligation, SDS addition and incubation at 65 °C were omitted). For the ligation reaction (both in-solution and in-nucleus variants), 50 μl of 1 U/μl T4 DNA ligase (Life Technologies) was added per aliquot, followed by incubation at 16 °C for 4 h.
The cross-links were reversed by adding 60 μl of 10 mg/ml proteinase K (Roche) per aliquot and incubating at 65 °C overnight. After overnight incubation, another 60 μl of proteinase K per aliquot was added, followed by incubation at 65 °C for an additional 2 h. RNA was removed by adding 12.5 μl of 10 mg/ml RNase A (Roche) per aliquot and incubating at 37 °C for 60 min. DNA was isolated by a phenol (Sigma) extraction, followed by a phenol/chloroform/isoamylalcohol (Sigma) extraction and standard ethanol precipitation. The precipitated DNA was washed three times with 70 % ethanol, and dissolved in 25 μl TE per aliquot. Subsequently, all aliquots were pooled and the Hi-C DNA was quantified (Quant-iT Pico Green, Life Technologies). Biotin was removed from non-ligated restriction fragment ends by incubating 30–40 μg of Hi-C library DNA with T4 DNA polymerase (NEB) for 4 h at 20 °C in the presence of dATP. After DNA purification (QIAquick PCR purification kit, Qiagen) and sonication (Covaris E220), the sonicated DNA was end-repaired with T4 DNA polymerase, T4 DNA polynucleotide kinase, Klenow (all NEB) and dNTPs in 1× T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer (NEB). Double size selection of DNA was performed using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter), before dATP-addition with Klenow exo (NEB). Biotin-marked ligation products were isolated with MyOne Streptavidin C1 Dynabeads (Life Technologies) in binding buffer (5 mM Tris pH8, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl) for 30 min at room temperature, followed by two washes in binding buffer, and one wash in 1× T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer (NEB). Paired-end (PE) adapters (Illumina) were ligated onto Hi-C ligation products bound to streptavidin beads for 2 h at room temperature (T4 DNA ligase in 1× T4 DNA ligase reaction buffer [NEB], slowly rotating). After washes in wash buffer (5 mM Tris, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 M NaCl, 0.05 % Tween-20) and binding buffer, the DNA-bound beads were resuspended in NEBuffer 2. Bead-bound Hi-C DNA was amplified with 12 PCR amplification cycles using PE PCR 1.0 and PE PCR 2.0 primers (Illumina). The concentration and size distribution of Hi-C library DNA after PCR amplification was determined by Bioanalyzer profiles (Agilent Technologies) and quantitative PCR, and the Hi-C libraries were paired-end sequenced on Illumina Hi-Seq 1000 or MiSeq platforms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Amplification and Sequencing of mtDNA

For amplification we used the Advantage GC Genomic LA Polymerase(Clontech, Bella Avenue Mountain View, California) including a small amount of proofreading enzyme, a hot start antibody and a 3' to 5' proofreading exonuclease activity. It enables synthesis of PCR products of 8.5 kb using human genomic DNA templates.
Amplification reaction was carried out on a thermal cycler (Multicycler PTC240 Tetrad2, Hercules, CA) in a total volume of 50 μL each fragment (A and B) comprising 2.5 mg/mL BSA (St. Louis, Missouri), 2.5 mM each dNTP (Applied Biosystems), 10 mM each primer, 5U LA Genomic DNA polymerase (Clonetech) 1000 – 10000 mtDNA GEs. Thermal cycling conditions comprised an initial 3 min denaturation step at 93°C, followed by 93°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s and 68°C for 5 min 14 times proceeding 27 times with 93°C for 15 s, 55°C for 30 s and 68°C for 9 min increasing for 10 s each cycle. Amplicons were purified from residual primers and dNTPs enzymatically with ExoSAP-IT (ExoSAP-IT, USB, Cleveland, Ohio) and comparatively with a filtration method (Microcon YM-30 Centrifugal Filter Units: Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts).
From a 1.5 μM stock plate containing all 96 sequencing primers (Figure 1, step 4), 2 μL were decanted into a new plate right before each sequencing reaction. Big Dye Terminator mastermix (containing 1 μL BigDye Terminator v1.1 Cycle Sequencing mix (Applied Biosystems) and 3 μL BigDye Terminator v1.1 Sequencing Buffer (Applied Biosystems)), as well as 2 μL mtDNA Fragments A or B were aliquoted into the appropriate wells as shown in Figure 1 (step 4). 2 μL distilled water was added to reach a final volume of 10 μL. Pipetting those small volumes was performed using an 8-channel epMotion workstation (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany). Cycle sequencing was performed (after a first denaturation step of 95°C for 1 min) for 25 cycles of 10 s at 95°C, 5 s at 50°C, and 4 min at 60°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Differentiation of hESCs and hiPSCs into Haploid Cells

H1 (WA01, WiCell) hESCs and HFF1 (parent fibroblastsfrom ATCC, iPS derived internally(Easley et al., 2012 ) hiPSCs were cultured for 10 days in mouse spermatogonial stem cell (SSC) medium containing the following (all from Sigma, unless noted): MEMalpha (Invitrogen), 0.2% Bovine Serum Albumin, 5 µg/ml insulin, 10 µg/ml transferrin, 60 µM putrescine, 2 mM L-glutamine (Invitrogen), 50 µM β-mercaptoethanol, 1 ng/ml hbFGF (human basic fibroblast growth factor, BD Biosciences), 20 ng/ml GDNF (glial-derived neurotrophic factor, R&D Systems), 30 nM sodium selenite, 2.36 µM palmitic acid, 0.21 µM palmitoleic acid, 0.88 µM stearic acid, 1.02 µM oleic acid, 2.71 µM linoleic acid, 0.43 µM linolenic acid, 10 mM HEPES, and 0.5X penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen). To isolate haploid cells by FACS, H1 SSCs and HFF1 SSCs were stained with the Vybrant DyeCycle Violet Live-cell stain (Invitrogen) in the SSC medium listed above but substituting OptiMeM with no phenol red and run on a FACS Aria sorter (BD Biosciences). Haploid cells were then cultured on poly-d-lysine-coated coverslips and fixed with 4% para-formaldehyde prior to immunostaining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.