We Dissect Protocols

Multisizer 3

Manufactured by Beckman Coulter
414 citations
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Canada
About the product

The Multisizer 3 is a high-performance particle size analyzer that uses the Coulter Principle to measure the size and count of particles in a sample. It can accurately measure particle sizes ranging from 0.4 to 1,200 microns. The Multisizer 3 provides reliable and reproducible particle size distribution data for a wide range of applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

The Multisizer 3 Coulter Counter by Beckman Coulter has been discontinued and is no longer available for purchase through official channels. Beckman Coulter recommends the Multisizer 4e Coulter Counter as an alternative, offering enhanced features and a broader sizing range of 0.2 to 1,600 μm.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

414 protocols using «multisizer 3»

1

Measuring Photosystem II Efficiency in Microalgae

2025
The procedure for carrying out SEM was described in Chiu et al. (Chiu et al. 2020 (link)). For the measurement of photosystem II efficiency (quantum yield, Fv’/Fm’), the cells were cultivated in 1 L flasks containing 150 mL of the ASW-IMK medium until mid-log phase in conditions described above. A portion of the culture was harvested and its medium was renewed followed by cell density measurement using a particle analyzer (Multisizer III, Beckman Coulter, USA). Aliquots of the prepared cells were transferred to medical grade 24-well plates, each well received 500 thousand (0.5 × 106) cells. The volume of the medium in each well was brought to 2 mL using the ASW-IMK medium. These cells were incubated at 25 °C under 50 μmol photon/m2/s light intensity for three days before the stress treatments. Light-adapted photosystem II (PSII) efficiency (Fv’/Fm’) was measured by a portable fluorometer (AquaPen AP-C 100, Photon Systems Instruments, Czech Republic). The procedure was described in Pan et al. (2011 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FUS-Mediated Blood-Brain Barrier Opening

2025
The FUS procedure was conducted using the RK-300 small bore FUS device (FUS Instruments, Toronto, CA). Mice were prepared by shaving and depilating their heads before being placed in a supine position and coupled to the transducer using degassed ultrasound gel. Blood-brain barrier opening was achieved using a 1.1 MHz single-element transducer with a 10 ms burst length over a 2000 ms period. A total of 60 sonications were administered during a 2-minute sonication duration. The FUS Instruments software, operating in the “Blood-brain Barrier” mode, facilitated PCD-modulated PNP. The feedback control system parameters were set as follows: a starting pressure of 0.2 MPa, pressure increment of 0.05 MPa, maximum pressure of 0.4 MPa, 20 sonication baselines without microbubbles, area under the curve (AUC) bandwidth of 500 Hz, AUC threshold of 10 standard deviations, pressure drop of 0.95, and frequency selection of the subharmonic, first ultraharmonic, and second ultraharmonic. Optison (GE HealthCare) microbubbles were intravenously injected as a bolus dose of 10^5 microbubbles per gram of body weight. Prior to sonication, the distribution of microbubble diameter and concentration was assessed using a Coulter counter (Multisizer 3; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California). T1 mapping MRI sequences were used to guided sonication targeting. Six non-overlapping sonication targets were placed over one frontal hemisphere with placement optimized to target CCMs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cell Volume Measurement via Multisizer

2025
All cell volumes were determined by volume displacement using a Multisizer 3 (Beckman Coulter) and ISOTON II electrolyte (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Cell Density and Sizing Measurements

2024
Cultures were maintained in an active growth phase (1 x 106 to 1 x 107 cells mL−1) in preparation for most experiments. Cell density and sizing were measured with a Coulter counter (Beckman Coulter Multisizer 3, CA, USA). Raw cell diameter event counts were converted to relative frequency and visualized as ridgeline plots with the R tidyverse packages (https://tidyverse.tidyverse.org/) and ggridges (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/ggridges/index.html). For routine culture maintenance, >1000 counts were acquired to determine cell suspension density; for cell sizing experiments >10,000 were acquired to obtain smooth distributions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood-Brain Barrier Opening

2024
FUS BBBO was performed with the RK-300 small bore FUS device (FUS Instruments, Toronto, CA). Heads of mice were shaved and depilated prior to supine placement and coupling to the transducer with degassed ultrasound gel. BBBO was performed with a 1.13 MHz single-element transducer using a 10 ms burst length over a 2000 ms period for 60 total sonications during a 2-min sonication duration. Fixed PNP application was performed using the “Burst” mode on the FUS Instruments software. PCD-modulated PNP was performed using the “Blood-brain Barrier” mode of the FUS Instruments software. Parameters used for this feedback control system included a starting pressure of 0.2 MPa, pressure increment of 0.05 MPa, maximum pressure of 0.4 MPa, 20 sonication baselines without microbubbles, AUC bandwidth of 500 Hz, AUC threshold of 10 standard deviations, pressure drop of 0.95, and frequency selection of the subharmonic, first ultraharmonic, and second ultraharmonic. Gadolinium contrast agent (Multihance) was injected as a bolus intravenously with a dose of 0.01 mmol diluted in saline at a molarity of 0.2 mmol/mL prior to T1-RARE image acquisition. Albumin-shelled microbubbles were made in-house as previously described59 (link) and intravenously injected as a bolus dose of 105 microbubbles per gram body weight. Distribution of microbubble diameter and concentration was acquired with a Coulter counter (Multisizer 3; Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, California) prior to sonication. High resolution T2-weighted images and T1-RARE images were used to guide FUS targeting to the pre-selected CCM. A single sonication target was used in all experiments, except in the case of PCD-modulated PNPs, in which two sonication targets were used. Mice receiving the repeat FUS BBBO regimens had all sonications staged 3 days apart with the same anatomical location targeted each time.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Virginia, University of Virginia Health System, Neurological Surgery, Focused Ultrasound Foundation

Top 5 most cited protocols using «multisizer 3»

1

Multiparameter Cell Sorting Protocol

L1210, FL5 and HL60 cells from exponentially growing cultures were centrifuged at 200 g (5 minutes) and resuspended in phenol red-free L-15 (L1210) or RPMI (FL5, HL60) media supplemented with 2% FBS, at a concentration between 15–20×106 cells/ml. The cell suspensions were filtered through BD Falcon Cell-Strainer Caps (352235) and then sorted on a BD FACSAria IIu at 20 psi using a 100 µM nozzle at a flow rate of “1.0”. Cell aggregates were removed from the analysis using a sequential gating strategy relying first on FSC height versus width followed by SSC height versus width parameters, as recommended by BD (see BD FACService TECHNOTES, Customer Focused Solutions, Vol. 9 No. 4 October, 2004). Multiple sized microspheres were purchased from Spherotech (cat. # PPS-6K) and analyzed on the FACSAria IIu.
For initial size separation sorting we utilized a single parameter histogram with gates isolating the lower and upper 10% of the intensity distribution of the chosen parameter, unless otherwise indicated. Sequential boolean gating strategies are described in detail in the text (See Figure 4). Light scatter parameters were measured using the 488 nm laser. Excitation/emission parameters are described in the text for each experiment. FACS data was prepared for presentation using FlowJo v. 8.1. The size distribution of the sorted cells was determined using the Z2 Coulter Counter and Multisizer III software (Beckman Coulter). Microsoft Excel was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Center for Systems Biology, Bar-Ilan University, Harvard University, University of Toronto

2

Quantifying Adipocyte Size Dynamics

Cell-size distribution in epididymal fat was measured after 2, 4, and 12 weeks of high-fat and control feeding using Beckman Coulter Multisizer III as previously described [9] (link). Briefly, 20–30 mg of fat tissue were sampled from the midsection, by dissection and then removing the sample for fixation from the center of the cut epididymal fat. Tissue samples were immediately fixed in osmium tetroxide [48] (link), incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 48 h, and then adipose cell size was determined by a Beckman Coulter Multisizer III with a 400 µm aperture. The range of cell sizes that can effectively be measured using this aperture is 20–240 µm. The instrument was set to count 6,000 particles, and the fixed-cell suspension was diluted so that coincident counting was <10%. After collection of pulse sizes, the data were expressed as particle diameters and displayed as histograms of counts against diameter using linear bins and a linear scale for the x-axis (Fig. 3). Cell-size distribution was measured in four samples from each group, except for the C57 mice after 4-week high-fat diet exposure, which had only three available samples. A sample was taken from each fat pad and processed separately. Each sample was then counted at least twice. The curves from the two samples are then averaged, but only after examining the reproducibility between the two samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

3

Biotinylated Lipid-Shelled Microbubbles for Targeted Imaging

Biotinylated lipid-shelled decafluorobutane microbubbles (MB) were prepared by sonication of a gas-saturated aqueous suspension of distearoylphosphatidylcholine (2 mg/mL), polyoxyethylene-40-stearate (1 mg/mL), and distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine-PEG (2000) biotin (0.4 mg/mL) (Avanti Polar Lipids). Surface conjugation of biotinylated ligands was performed as previously described using a streptavidin bridge.14 (link) Microbubbles targeted to platelet GPIbα (MB-A1) were prepared by surface conjugation of dimeric recombinant murine VWF A1 domain (mature VWF amino acids 445 to 716).9 (link) Microbubbles targeted to VWF (MB-GC300) were prepared using a cell-derived biotinylated peptide representing the N-terminal 300 amino acids of GPIbα. Control non-targeted microbubbles (MB) were prepared using either human VWF A1 domain with a loss-of-function mutation (G561S) or a non-specific non-binding control monoclonal antibody (mAb) (R3-34, BD Biosciences) as appropriate. Microbubble concentrations and size distributions were measured by electrozone sensing (Multisizer III, Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Scripps Research Institute

4

Adipose Cell Size Distribution Analysis

Samples (2 g) of subcutaneous adipose tissue were obtained inferior to the umbilicus after administration of 0.25 lidocaine with adrenaline (epinephrine) for local anesthesia, from which two 20–30-mg samples were used immediately for adipose cell-size distribution analysis by the osmium fixation, Beckman Coulter (Miami, FL) Multisizer III, curve-fitting analysis technique previously described (6 (link)). In addition to determining the fraction of large adipose cells (fraclarge) and the “peak diameter” of the large adipose cells as described, the “% of adipose cells above” (% large cells) and “% below” (% small cells) the nadir were calculated.
A secondary end point, the number of subcutaneous adipose cells, was estimated by the following formula: cell number = volume of subcutaneous abdominal adipose tissue/weighted volume per cell. Volume of adipose tissue was obtained from MRI scans, and average volume per cell was calculated as the weighted volume based on the relative number of cells per volume bin in the cell-volume histogram generated by the Multisizer software. We used the following formula: average volume per cell = Σ 4/3π(di/2)3pi (that is, the sum of the volumes corresponding to each bin times the relative frequency (p) of that bin (i) (16 (link)). The number of large cells was then calculated by applying the percentage of large cells to the total number of cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Yale University, Leipzig University, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases

5

Characterization and Release of Microparticles

Scanning electron micrographs of the microparticles were obtained using a scanning electron microscope (JSM-6330F, JEOL, Peabody, MA). The size distribution of microparticles was determined using volume impedance measurements on a Multisizer 3 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA).
Release assays were conducted by incubating a suspension of particles on a roto-shaker at 37 °C; (i) 10 mg in 1 ml of cell culture media for IL-2MP and TGFβMP, and (ii) 10 mg in 1 ml of PBS containing 0.2% Tween-80 for rapaMP (due to the low solubility of rapa in aqueous solutions, release assays were conducted in PBS containing Tween-80 to avoid a obtaining a release profile that was dissolution dependant). At regular time intervals, particle suspensions were centrifuged (250g, 5min), the supernatant removed, and the particles re-suspended in 1 ml of appropriate solution. The amount of each cytokine in the supernatant was measured using a cytokine-specific ELISA (R&D systems, Minneapolis, MN), and the amount of rapa was measured using spectrophotometry (absorbance at 278 nm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Pittsburgh, McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine

The spelling variants listed above correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.