Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Complete protease inhibitor cocktail

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Germany, United States, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Canada, China, France, Japan, Spain, Australia, Italy, Belgium, Sweden, Morocco, Austria, Cameroon, India, Ireland, Macao
About the product

The Complete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail is a laboratory product designed to inhibit a broad spectrum of proteases. It is a concentrated solution containing a mixture of protease inhibitors effective against a variety of protease classes. This product is intended to be used in research applications to preserve the integrity of target proteins by preventing their degradation by proteolytic enzymes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 727 protocols using complete protease inhibitor cocktail

1

Western Blot Analysis of Parasite Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For western blot analysis, parasites were collected with MACS magnetic columns (Miltenyi Biotec) and lysed in 0.03% saponin solution for 5 min. Collected samples were dissolved in lysis buffer (4% SDS, 0.5% Triton X-100, 25-75 U DNase I (Takara Bio) and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) in 0.5% PBS) and denatured with SDS sample buffer containing protein-reducing agents dithiothreitol. Lysates were boiled at 95 °C for 3 min and run on polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Proteins were transferred on PVDF membranes and blocked with a Bullet Blocking One (nacalai tesque, Kyoto, Japan). Blocked membranes were incubated with primary antibodies for 1 h followed by secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Catalogue no: 115-035-062, Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories Inc., West Grove, PA, USA) for 30 min. Mouse anti-HA antibody (6E2) (Cell Signaling Technology) was used at 1:1000 dilution. Mouse anti-Myc antibody (9B11) (Catalogue no: 2276, Cell Signaling Technology) was used at 1:1000 dilution. Mouse HRP was used at 1:5000 dilution. After probing with antibodies, the membranes were incubated with chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min and proteins were visualized with WSE-6100 LuminoGraph I (ATTO, Tokyo, Japan). To investigate the protein expression levels of PfAldolase as an internal control, the membrane was washed with WB Stripping Solution Strong (nacalai tesque) for 30 min and blocked with Bullet Blocking One. After blocking, the membrane was incubated with HRP anti-plasmodium aldolase antibody (Catalogue no: ab38905, 1:2000; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) for 30 min and chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunoprecipitation of Epitope-Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human Embryonic Kidney (HEK) 293 cells (Riken BRC, RBRC-RCB1637, Lot. 024) were transfected with each expression gene, solubilized in lysis buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Cat#87788) and supplemented with a complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, Cat#11836170001). Immunoprecipitation was performed by incubation with an anti-DDDDK-tag bearing mAb-Magnetic Beads (FLA−1GS, MBL, Cat#M185−11), anti-HA-tag mAb-Magnetic Beads (TANA2, MBL, Cat#M180–11), or anti-Myc-tag mAb-Magnetic Beads (PL14, MBL, Cat#M047−11) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Immune complexes were separated by electrophoresis followed by blotting with anti-FLAG M2 (M2, Sigma-Aldrich, Cat#F1804), anti-HA (TANA2, MBL, Cat#M180–3), and anti-Myc (My3, MBL, Cat#M192–3) antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of S. aureus ParB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The S. aureus strains JE2_ParB-3xFLAG and JE2_3xFLAG-mNG were grown overnight in TSB at 37°C with agitation. The next day the cultures were diluted 1:200 in 50 mL of TSB and incubated at 37°C with agitation until they reached the mid-exponential phase (OD600 0.6–0.8). Cultures of the strain JE2_3xFLAG-mNG were supplemented with 100 μM IPTG to induce expression of 3xflag-mng. Formaldehyde (Sigma) was added to a final concentration of 1% (v/v) and the mixture was incubated at room-temperature with shaking for 30 min. Afterwards, glycine was added to a final concentration of 125 mM and cultures were further incubated at room-temperature with shaking for 10 min. The mixture was cooled down on ice and centrifuged at 7000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. The pellet was resuspended in ice-cold PBS and centrifuged again as in the previous step. This was repeated three times, before snap-freezing the pellet in liquid nitrogen and storing it at −80°C. When required, samples were thawed, resuspended in 300μl IP buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, 25 mM sucrose, 1 μg mL−1 lysostaphin, Sigma, 0.3 μg mL−1 RNase A, Sigma, and 1 tablet of cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail, EDTA free, Roche, per 10 mL of buffer) and incubated at 37°C for 1h with shaking. Afterwards the samples were cooled on ice, followed by addition of TritonX-100 to a final concentration of 1% (v/v). Samples were then sonicated using a Bioruptor Plus bath sonicator at 4°C using 50 cycles of alternating 30s on and 90s off in the high-power mode, followed by centrifugation at 20000 ×g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatants were mixed with 50 μL of anti-Flag M2 agarose beads (Sigma, pre-washed in 1mL of IP buffer supplemented with 1% Triton X-100), and the mixture was incubated overnight at 4°C with tumbling. Afterwards, the IP-samples were centrifuged at 800 ×g for 2 min at 4°C, the supernatant was discarded, and the beads were resuspended in 1 mL of IP buffer with 1% Triton X-100. The IP-samples were centrifuged as in the previous step and resuspended in 1 mL of High-Salt Buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 700 mM NaCl, 0.1% Na-deoxycholate, Calbiochem, 1% Triton X-100). IP-samples were centrifuged as in the previous step and resuspended in 1 mM of TE buffer (10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA), this step was done twice. Then, the IP-samples were centrifuged and resuspended in 300 μL of Reversal Buffer (RB, 10 mM Tris/HCl pH 8, 1 mM EDTA, 300 mM NaCl), followed by addition of SDS to a final concentration of 1% (w/v). All samples were then incubated at 65°C with 1500 rpm shaking for 14–16 h. Afterwards, the IP-samples were centrifuged at 800 ×g for 2 min and the supernatant was transferred to a new tube. Then 300 μL of phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol mix (Roth) were added to each sample, the mixture was vigorously mixed by vortexing for 10 s and centrifuged at 20000 ×g for 5 min at RT. 250 μL were taken from the aqueous phase and transferred to a new tube where they were combined with 25 μL of 3 M sodium-acetate (pH 5.2), 1.5 μL of 20 mg mL−1 glycogen and 690 μl of absolute ethanol. The samples were placed at −80°C for 1 h and then centrifuged at 20000 ×g for 15 min at RT. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet was washed with 1mL of ice-cold 70% (v/v) ethanol. Samples were centrifuged at 20000 ×g for 1 min at RT and the supernatant was discarded. The pellet was left to air-dry. Afterwards the pellet was resuspended in 25μl of Nuclease-free water and incubated at 55°C for 10 min with gentle shaking. Samples were sent to Lausanne Genomic Technologies Facility for next-generation sequencing. Sequencing results were assembled to the reference genome (NCBI Reference Sequence GCF_002085525.1) using the CLC workbench (Qiagen) and plotted using Microsoft Excel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Analyzing Cellular Stress Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For whole cell lysates, cultured cells were rinsed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 5 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS supplemented with PhosSTOP and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail; both from Roche). For whole cell lysates from growth plates, tissue was rinsed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in RIPA buffer using a Dounce homogenizer. Protein concentrations were determined with the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific).
Unless otherwise stated, proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE under reducing conditions and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. After 60 min blocking with 5% dry milk (Sigma-Aldrich) in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween-20, membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies detecting ATF4 (11815, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1,000), ATF6 (70B1413.1, Novus Biologicals, 1:1,000), β-actin (A5441, Sigma-Aldrich, 1:10,000), eIF2a (5324, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1,000), G6PDH (8866, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1,000), p-eIF2a (3398, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1,000) and ubiquitin (3936, Cell Signaling Technology, 1:1,000). Appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (anti-mouse HRP-conjugated, Dako; anti-rabbit HRP-conjugated, Dako) were used for chemiluminescent detection (Western Lightning Plus, PerkinElmer). As a loading control for ubiquitinated protein expression, nitrocellulose membranes were stained with 0.5% Ponceau S (Sigma-Aldrich) in 1% acetic acid.
To analyse reduced and oxidized PDI by western blot, cells were lysed in 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 6.8, 2% SDS supplemented with PhosSTOP and cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail and 40 mM ethylmaleimide to block free cysteines. Protein concentrations were measured and proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE under reducing or non-reducing conditions. Upon transfer, nitrocellulose membranes were blocked and incubated overnight at 4 °C with antibodies against PDI (3501, Cell Signaling Technology) or β-actin. Appropriate HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies were used for chemiluminescent detection. Images were acquired using an Odyssey XF Imaging system and LICOR software (LICORbio).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of H3K9me3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ChIP on cross-linked chromatin, cells obtained from minced frozen tissue in presence of ice-cold PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail were fixed with 1% formaldehyde for 10 min and quenched with 125 mM of glycine for 5 minutes at room temperature. Subsequently, cells were washed in PBS, centrifuged to remove the supernatant. Cross liked cells were re-suspended in SDS lysis buffer (100 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 50 mM Tris–Cl and ‘Complete protease inhibitor cocktail’ from Roche). After 10 min on ice with occasional vortexing, cells were diluted in ChIP dilution buffer (0.01% SDS, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mM EDTA, 16.7 mM Tris–Cl, 167 mM NaCl and ‘Complete protease inhibitor cocktail’ from Roche), and sonicated. Sheared chromatin was incubated with anti-H3K9 tri methyl antibody (Abcam, ab8898) overnight at 4*c with gentle rotation. Genomic DNA was quantified with Qubit 2.0 DNA HS Assay (ThermoFisher, Massachusetts, USA) and quality assessed by TapeStation genomic DNA Assay (Agilent Technologies, California, USA). Library preparation was performed using KAPA Hyper Prep kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) per manufacturer’s recommendations. Library quality and quantity were assessed with Qubit 2.0 DNA HS Assay (ThermoFisher, Massachusetts, USA), Tapestation High Sensitivity D1000 Assay (Agilent Technologies, California, USA), and QuantStudio ® 5 System (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Illumina® 8-nt dual-indices were used. Equimolar pooling of libraries was performed based on QC values and sequenced on an Illumina® NovaSeq S4 (Illumina, California, USA) with a read length configuration of 150 PE for 20M PE reads (10M in each direction) per sample.
Raw sequencing data were processed with Trimmomatic (v0.36)60 (link) to filter out low-quality reads and trim adaptor sequences. Reads were aligned to the reference genome using STAR software (v2.5.3a)61 (link) with default parameters. Distribution of reads was analyzed using RSeQC (v2.6)62 (link). H3K9 trimethylation peak calling was performed with MACS2 (v2.1.1)63 (link), followed by annotation and distribution analysis of peaks using bedtools (v2.25.0)64 (link). Differential peak analysis was performed using Python script employing the Fisher test. For GO analysis, list of genes with H3K9me3 peaks that were downregulated in expression were input into Enrichr65 (link) and top 10 GO biological process terms based on p-value ranking were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunoblotting Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole‐cell lysates of Calu‐3 cells were prepared using a Triton‐X lysis buffer containing “cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail” (Roche). Protein concentrations were assessed via the “DC Protein assay” (Bio‐Rad Laboratories). Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (ThermoFisher Scientific). For protein detection the following primary antibodies were used: GAPDH (1:1000, R&D Systems, #2275‐PC‐020), ISG15 (1:200, Santa Cruz, #sc166755), MX1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #37849), pSTAT1 Y701 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #9167), pSTAT2 Y689 (1:1000, Upstate, #02‐224), SARS‐CoV‐2 Nucleoprotein (1:1000, Sino Biological, #40143‐R019), STAT1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #14994), STAT2 (1:1000, Upstate, #06‐502) and Tubulin (1:1.000, Abcam, #ab179513). Protein bands were visualized using IRDye‐labeled secondary antibodies at dilution 1:40 000 (LI‐COR Biotechnology, IRDye 800CW Goat anti‐Rabbit, #926‐32211 and IRDye 800CW Goat anti‐Mouse IgG, #926‐32210) and Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI‐COR Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of DRBD18 Interactome in Trypanosoma brucei

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 1 × 1010T. brucei 29-13 cells were harvested and washed with PBS, and mitochondria were enriched as described previously (Hashimi et al. 2008 (link); McAdams et al. 2018 (link)). Enriched mitochondria were lysed in N150 buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% [v/v] NP-40, and 5 mM β-ME) with 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in the presence of cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche). Lysate was divided into two fractions: one was incubated with 200 U SUPERase-In RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen) and 0.5 μg/mL DNase I, while the other was incubated with DNase I and a nuclease cocktail containing 60 μg RNase A, 2500 U RNase T1 (Ambion), 28 U RNase H (Invitrogen), and 2040 U micrococcal nuclease for 1 h on ice. Lysates were then incubated with α-DRBD18 antibodies (Lott et al. 2015 (link); Ciganda et al. 2023 (link)) attached to protein A fast-flow beads (GE Healthcare) for 2 h at 4°C. After washing with wash buffer (50 mM Tris [pH 8], 300 mM NaCl, 0.1% [v/v] NP-40, and 5 mM β-ME), the bound proteins were electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline with Tween-20 (TBST) and probed with polyclonal antibodies against DRBD18 (Lott et al. 2015 (link)), RESC2 (Ammerman et al. 2011 (link)), RESC8 (McAdams et al. 2019 (link)), RESC10 (Dubey et al. 2021 (link)), RESC11A (Simpson et al. 2017 (link)), RESC13 (Fisk et al. 2008 (link)), RESC14 (McAdams et al. 2018 (link)), KRBP72 (Dubey et al. 2024 ), KH2F2 (Kumar et al. 2016 (link)), MRP1 (Fisk et al. 2009a (link)), MRP2 (Fisk et al. 2009a (link)), P22 (Hayman et al. 2001 (link)), RBP16 (Ammerman et al. 2008 (link)), TbRGG1 (Fisk et al. 2009a (link)), and RECC complex (KREPA1, KREPA2, KREPA3, and KREL1) (Panigrahi et al. 2001 (link)). Blots were washed with TBST buffer and subsequently probed with secondary antibodies, either goat α-rabbit HRP (1:2000 dilution) or goat α-mouse HRP (1:2000). Signals were detected using an ECL preparation as recommended by the manufacturer (Thermo Fisher Scientific), visualized on a Chemi Doc imaging system (Bio-Rad).
For pulldown in the reverse direction, 1 × 1010 cells harboring endogenously tagged RESC13-MHT, RESC14-MHT, or RESC2-PTP (Wackowski et al. 2024 (link)) were harvested and lysed in N150 buffer with 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 in the presence of cOmplete Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Roche), 1 mM CaCl2, and 0.5 μg/mL DNase I. Lysate was then divided into two fractions: one fraction was incubated with 200 U SUPERase-In RNase Inhibitor (Invitrogen) and 0.5 μg/mL DNase I, whereas the other fraction was incubated with DNase I and a nuclease cocktail containing 60 μg RNase A, 2500 U RNase T1 (Ambion), 28 U RNase H (Invitrogen), and 2040 U micrococcal nuclease for 1 h on ice. The two lysates were then incubated with IgG Sepharose 6 Fast Flow beads (Cytiva) for 2 h on ice. Beads were washed with N150 buffer, and for MHT-RESC13 and MHT-RESC2, they were incubated in TEV cleavage buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 8.0], 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% [v/v] NP-40, 0.5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT) with 100 U AcTEV Protease (Invitrogen) at 4°C overnight. For MHT-RESC14, glycine (100 mM [pH 3.0]) elution, followed by neutralization with 1 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), was performed. IP was performed as described previously (McAdams et al. 2018 (link); Wackowski et al. 2024 (link)). TEV elutions (RESC13 and RESC2) and glycine elution (RESC14) were subjected to western blot analysis to detect the target protein using either native antibodies (RESC2 and RESC13) or α-Myc antibodies (Invitrogen; 1:2000 dilution) (RESC14), and interacting partner DRBD18 was detected using α-DRBD18 antibody.
For pulldown of DRBD18 overexpression variants, 1 × 1010 cells were harvested, and then washed in 1× PBS. Cell lysates were precleared using Superdex 200 beads (Cytiva). IP of 2XMyc-tagged DRBD18 variants from cleared lysate was performed using α-Myc antibody as described previously (McAdams et al. 2018 (link)). Glycine elutions were subjected to western blot analysis to detect the DRBD18 variants using α-Myc antibody and interacting RESC factors (RESC11A, RESC2, and RESC13) using their native antibodies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunoprecipitation of Endogenously Tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In general, Flp-In T-REx 293 cells were co-transfected with 1 µg plasmid per construct in a 6-well plate using TransIT-293 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. 16–24 hr after transfection, the cells were collected in cold PBS, lysed in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM KOAc, 2.5 Mg(OAc)2, 1% digitonin with 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 × cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail [PIC; Roche, 1187358] with or without 1 × PhosStop (Roche)) for 10 min on ice, and clarified by centrifugation at 21,130 × g for 10 min at 4 °C. Lysis buffer for Strep-Tactin pulldowns (PD) also contained BioLock (IBA, 2–0205). Normalized lysates were added to immunoprecipitation (IP) buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 100 mM KOAc, 2.5 Mg(OAc)2, 1% Triton X-100) containing either anti-FLAG M2 agarose (Sigma, A2220) or Strep-Tactin Sepharose HP resin (Cytiva, 28-9355-99) and incubated while rotating for 1 hr at 4 °C. After rotation, samples were washed 3 times with IP buffer and eluted in protein sample buffer.
To immunoprecipitate endogenously tagged CDAN1 or CDIN1, 12 15 cm dishes of each cell line were lysed in 12 mL IP buffer supplemented with 1 mM DTT, 1 × PIC, and 1 × PhosStop and incubated with anti-FLAG M2 agarose resin. Beads were washed, eluted in protein sample buffer, and analyzed using SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For protein extraction, 30 mg of brain homogenate tissue was lysed in ice-cold RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8; 150 mM sodium chloride; 1 mM EDTA; 1% Triton X-100; 0.5% sodium deoxycholate; 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate) supplemented with complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). The final protein concentration in the supernatants was determined using a Pierce BCA assay kit (Thermo Fisher, Waltham, MA, USA), and a total of 25 µg of protein was subjected to 4 − 15% Mini-PROTEAN polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) and transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories) using a mini Trans-Blot Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories). The membranes were then blocked for 1 h at room temperature with Tris-buffered saline containing 5% nonfat dry milk and 0.1% Tween-20 and incubated with anti-caspase1 (1:1,000; clone EPR16883, Abcam, Cambridge, UK, ab179515) and anti-beta-tubulin (1:2,500; clone AA2, MerckMillipore, Burglinton, MA, USA, T5076) antibodies overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were finally incubated with an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:5,000, Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA, A90-216P) for 1 h at room temperature. Images were obtained by using the Octoplus QPLEX imaging system after the membranes were incubated with Clarity Max ECL substrate reagent (Bio-Rad Laboratories).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Purification of Picornavirus-like Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The construction of pEAQ-HT-PV3 SktSC8-P1 and pEAQ-3CD, containing plant codon-optimised versions of the P1 region of PV3(Saukett)-SC8 and the PV 3CD protease from PV1 Mah have been reported previously38 (link). Plasmids pEAQ-HT-PV1 MahSC6b-P1 and pEAQ-HT-PV2 MEFSC6b-P1 were constructed by inserting codon-optimised versions of the P1 region of either PV1 (Mahoney)-SC6b or PV2 (MEF-1)-SC6b between the AgeI and XhoI sites of pEAQ-HT66 (link). Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain LBA4404 was transformed with each construct separately by electroporation and propagated at 28 °C in Luria-Bertani media containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin and 50 µg/mL rifampicin. Co-expression of the P1 sequences with the 3CD protease in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves was carried out by co-infiltration as previously described38 (link) (Supplementary Fig. 4).
At various days post-infiltration (dpi) VLPs were extracted from the infiltrated region of the leaves with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline + MgCl2 and CaCl2 (Sigma-Aldrich), in each case supplemented with EDTA to a final concentration of 20 mM. All extraction buffers also contained cOmplete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, UK). The purification process was carried out as previously described38 (link). Briefly, crude extracts were centrifuged at 9500 × g for 15 min at 4 °C following filtration over a 0.45 µm syringe filter (Sartorius). The clarified extract was then concentrated through a sucrose cushion (1 ml 70% (w/v) and 5 ml 25% (w/v)) at 167,000 × g for 3 h at 4 °C and the lower fraction retrieved. Following dialysis and further concentration using PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) and Amicon Centrifugal Filter Units (Millipore), the sample was purified by ultracentrifugation through a Nycodenz (Axis-Shield) gradient (20–60% (w/v)) at 247,103 × g for 24 h and 4 °C. VLPs were collected by piercing the side of the tube with a needle and the Nycodenz removed through PD10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare) prior to concentration using Amicon Centrifugal Filter Units (Millipore) (Table 1 and Supplementary Fig. 4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.