We Dissect Protocols

Whatman filter paper

Manufactured by Cytiva
2 327 citations
Sourced in United Kingdom, United States, Germany, Japan, Switzerland, China, India
About the product

Whatman filter paper is a laboratory filtration product designed for various filtering applications. It is manufactured to provide consistent quality and performance. The core function of Whatman filter paper is to separate solid particles from liquids or gases through the process of filtration.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Whatman filter papers are commercialized by Cytiva and available through authorized distributors. The prices vary depending on the specific grade and size, but no discontinued or obsolete models are mentioned. For example, Whatman Grade 1 Qualitative Filter Papers are available in various sizes, with prices ranging from approximately $15.20 to $142.75 per box of 100 sheets. Similarly, Whatman Grade 54 Quantitative Filter Papers are offered in multiple sizes, with prices between $55.00 and $1,229.00 per pack of 100 sheets.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

2 327 protocols using «whatman filter paper»

1

Constructing a Multivirus Mock Community

2025
A virus MC was constructed using virus stocks consisting of tailed phages T5, Det7, and P22, the filamentous phage M13, and the mammalian viruses MHV-68, BVDV-1 strain Ky1203nc [34 (link)], and RV-A strain simian rotavirus SA/11 (Table 1). Virus titres were determined by epifluorescence microscopy using a protocol adapted from [35 (link),36 (link)]. Briefly, a 13 mm Al2O3 Anodisc 0.02 μm filter membrane (Cytiva, Little Chalfont, UK, ref 6809-7003) was placed in a Swinnex filter holder (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, ref SX0001300) fitted onto a glass tube protruding through a rubber stopper into a Büchner flask. The flask was connected to a Millivac Maxi vacuum pump (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany, ref SD1P014M04). After the pump was switched on, 400 μL deionised water or PBS was added to the filter holder to confirm the inlet was sealed. The stained sample was added gradually using a 1 mL micropipette. The filter was then washed with 400 μL of deionised water or PBS and any remaining liquid was aspirated for one minute. The filter was then placed sample-side-up onto Whatman filter paper (Whatman, Marlborough, MA, USA, ref 1004-055) to dry for 5 min. A 7.5 μL drop of Fluoromount G (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA, ref 00-4958-02) was placed on a glass microscopy slide (VWR, Leicestershire, UK, ref 631-0117) and the filter placed on top with 7.5 μL of Fluoromount G added to the filter and covered with a glass cover slip (VWR, ref 631-0125). The slide was then left in the dark at 21 °C for at least 2 h to allow the mountant to set. The slides were imaged on an Axio Imager.M2 upright fluorescence microscope (Zeiss, Cambourne, UK). Samples were illuminated using a HAL 100 illuminator with a quartz collector 43 (Zeiss, Cambourne, UK, ref 423000-9901-000) and a 65HE Alexa 488 filter. For titre measurements, a 100X EC Plan-Neofluar oil immersion objective (Zeiss, Cambourne, UK, ref 420496-990-000) was used. Images were captured on an ICX 285 CCD monochrome camera (Sony, Surrey, UK). Between 15 and 20 images were taken of each filter at random locations.
To prepare the MC, each virus stock was diluted in PBS to obtain the same final concentration, except for MHV-68, for which the concentration was 25% of the concentration of the other viruses. A high concentration mock community (HI) was constructed such that 35 μL of the final MC contained 0.25 × 107 particles of MHV-68 and 1 × 107 of each of the other viruses, for a total of 6.25 × 107 virus particles. A lower amount of MHV-68 was used due to limited availability of stock. As the estimated number of virus particles in human faeces is up to ~109 particles/g [36 (link)], the total number of virus particles in 35 µL HI roughly corresponded to the maximum expected number of virus particles in 50 mg faeces, for a final concentration of 1.25 × 109 MC particles per gram of faeces. A low concentration MC (LO) was produced by 100-fold dilution of HI in PBS, with 35 µL of LO added to a 50 mg faecal sample corresponding to 1.25 × 107 MC particles per gram of faeces. MCs were stored at 4 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cultivating Chlorococcum sp. Using Dairy and Paper Wastewater

2025
The dairy wastewater (DWW) and paper-and-pulp wastewater (PWW) utilized in this research was supplied by local dairy industry and paper-and-pulp industry located in KwaZulu-Natal Provine, South Africa. The DWW was collected from the storage tank containing both processing and cleaning wastewaters generated during dairy production. While the PWW sample was obtained from the secondary effluent treatment plant. Each wastewater sample (20 L) was filtered separately using Whatman filter paper to get rid of the solid particles. Subsequently, these filtered samples were combined in various proportions to make a wastewater mixture formulation ratio for the cultivation of Chlorococcum sp. A comprehensive analysis of the physicochemical characteristics of the DWW and PWW is presented in Table 1.

Physico-chemical parameters of DWW and PWW.

Table 1
ParameterUnitDairy wastewaterPaper and pulp wastewater
pH2.876.94
ColourWhiteBrown
CODmg/L876955
TNmg/L736.25562.25
TPmg/L27.071.20
Namg/L237.731153.73
Kmg/L27.7368.40
Camg/L50.8048.00
Mgmg/L5.4718.13
Femg/L0.240.04
Cumg/L0.010.004
Znmg/L0.130.04
Mnmg/L0.040.76
Almg/L0.150.52

TN-Total nitrogen, TP- Total phosphorous.

Thereafter the wastewater collection, a preliminary assessment was performed to evaluate the viability of DWW and PPW as a sole or combined medium, as well as treated or untreated for the cultivation of Chlorococcum sp. The pH of the treated wastewater was adjusted to pH 7.1 and autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min before the wastewater was used for the cultivation. Then the cultivation experiments in an Erlenmeyer flask (100 mL working volume) were conducted under growth conditions of pH 7.1, ambient temperature, agitation speed (150 rpm) and cultivation duration of three weeks.
Furthermore, varied amount of DWW and PWW with or without BG11 medium supplementation was utilized to cultivate Chlorococcum sp with the most favourable condition (Table 2) then modelled and optimized.

Selected mixtures for the optimization model.

Table 2
MixtureBG11 (%)PWW (%)DWW (%)BG11+PWW + DWW (%)
DWBG25 (A)25075100
DWBG50 (B)50050100
DWPWBG25 (C)252550100
DWPWBG50 (D)502525100
A + B + C + D15050200400

DWBG25: Dairy wastewater (75 %) and blue-green algae 11 (25 %); DWBG50: Dairy wastewater (50 %) and blue-green algae 11 (50 %); DWPWBG25: Dairy wastewater (50 %), paper and pulp wastewater (25 %) and blue-green algae 11 (25 %); DWPWBG50: Dairy wastewater (25 %), paper and pulp wastewater (25 %) and blue-green algae 11 (50 %).

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microwave-Assisted Synthesis of Butyl Levulinate

2025
Several experiments were carried out for synthesizing BL using a Monowave-400 microwave synthesis reactor (Make: Anton Paar). The reactor is equipped with an internal magnetic stirrer to maintain uniform temperature distribution within the reaction mixture. The experimental setup utilized 10 ml capacity borosilicate glass vials with a working volume range of 3–6 ml. The microwave reactor featured a microwave radiation source with integrated pressure and temperature control systems. In each experiment, 2 mmol (232.22 mg) LA, 5 mL 1-butanol, varying amounts of catalysts, and a magnetic bead were placed in a borosilicate vial, sealed with a silicone septum, and secured with a snap cap before being placed in the reactor. Reaction parameters such as temperature, time, and stirring speed, were entered into the microwave reactor, with the heating rate set to “as fast as possible” to reach the desired temperature, followed by a hold time for the reaction to proceed. After completion, the mixture was cooled to 50 °C using compressed air. The product mixture was centrifuged, filtered through Whatman filter paper, and purified using a 0.22 μm nylon filter before product characterization. The effects of various parameters, such as reaction temperature, time, catalyst amount, catalyst loading, and recyclability, were investigated. Multiple reactions were performed at different temperatures and times to establish an appropriate kinetic mechanism model, with each reaction conducted in triplicate, and the average results were used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pseudomonas Bactericidal Activity Against Staphylococcus

2025
The bactericidal activity of P. aeruginosa against S. aureus was performed as described previously with slight modification57 (link). The PAO1, mexL mutants and complementary strains were cultured overnight at 37 °C in LB and 10 mL of supernatants were collected by centrifugation. The secondary metabolites were extracted from supernatants with 5 mL of chloroform, died, and resuspended in 500 µL of methanol. An overnight culture of S. aureus strain NCTC 8325 was grown in LB, then diluted to fresh liquid medium to OD600 = 0.1, evenly spread on the surface of LB agar. 20 µL of P. aeruginosa extract was spotted on 5.5 mm-diameter Whatman filter paper placed on the S. aureus plate, and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and the diameter of the inhibition zone was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Antibiotic Susceptibility Assay

2025
Whatman filter paper was cut into discs using a hole puncher and sterilized by autoclaving. Strains were grown overnight and then back diluted 1:100 before being allowed to grow to exponential phase. Cells were then diluted to OD600=0.1 in PBS and 100 μL was plated on LB agar or TCBS agar. Discs were then placed with sterile forceps onto inoculated plates before being impregnated with different dosages of ciprofloxacin or a 0.1N HCl vehicle control. Plates were incubated at 37°C overnight and zones of inhibition were measured the following day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «whatman filter paper»

1

HPLC Analysis of Compounds

The HPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) consisted of a waters 1525 binary HPLC pump, a Waters 2998 Photodiode Array Detector, and a Waters 2707 Autosampler. The data were acquired and processed using Windows XP-based Waters Breeze 2 software. Ultrapure water (18 MΩ/cm) was produced by a Milli-Q® Advantage A10® Water Purification System (Billerica, MA, USA).
The chromatographic separations were carried out on a reverse phase Waters Symmetry®C18 column (150 × 4.5 mm i.d., particle size 3.5 μm). The mobile phase was a mixture of acetonitrile and 10 mM potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (65:35, v/v; pH adjusted to 7 with sodium hydroxide) delivered at a flow rate of 1 ml/min. The mobile phase was filtered through 0.45-µm Whatman®filterpaper and sonicated for 20 min. Analysis was performed at ambient temperature, and the elution of the compounds was monitored by diode array detection (DAD) from 190 to 400 nm. The chromatograms were recorded at 254 nm, and the injection volume was 20 µl.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : King Saud University

2

Agarose Gel Shift Assay for eIF3 Binding

Recombinant eIF3 was expressed and purified from E. coli and native human eIF3 was purified from HeLa cells as previously described32 (link). The gel shift protocol was adapted from 33 (link) and 34 (link). A 0.7% agarose gel was prepared using Agarose Type 1B (Sigma A0576) in buffer consisting of 1× TBE supplemented with 75 mM KCl, and gel and buffer were pre-cooled at 4 °C. For each gel shift, 2 μl water, 1 μl of 5× Binding Buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM Mg(OAc)2, 70 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mg ml-1 BSA, 2 mM TCEP), 1 μl labeled RNA, and 1 μl of purified eIF3 or protein buffer was added, in the listed order, and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. 1 μl of room temperature 6× non-denaturing loading dye (40% w/v sucrose, with xylene cyanol and bromophenol blue) was added to the reactions and these were loaded on the agarose gel. The gel was run for 1 h at 40 V at 4 °C, buffer was replaced with fresh cold buffer, and the gel was run for another hour at 40 V. The gel was placed on top of positively charged nylon membrane with four pieces of Whatman filter paper underneath, covered in saran wrap, and dried for 1 h at 75 °C on a pre-heated gel drier. The gel was imaged using a phosphoimager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of California, Berkeley

3

Proboscis Extension Response Assay

PER assays were carried out as described in Slone et al. (Slone et al., 2007 (link)) with some modifications. Briefly, files were collected on the day of eclosion and kept in standard corn meal food for 3–7 days at 25°C. Before performing PER assays, flies were starved for 24 to 26 hr at 25°C in vials with a water-saturated Whatman filter paper. Flies were immobilized by cooling on ice, mounted by their backs/wings on a microscope slide using double-sided Scotch tape and allowed to recover for 30 min at room temperature. Prior to the PER assay, flies were allowed to drink water until satiation to ensure PER responses were nutrient derived. Flies that showed no response to water were excluded. Taste solutions were delivered with a 10 μl pipette to legs for up to ~four s. Each fly was tested three times with each taste solutions, and flies were allowed to drink water between each new application. A PER response was recorded as positive (1) if the proboscis was fully extended, otherwise it was recorded as negative (0). PER response scores (%) from a single fly was 0% (0/3 responses in the three applications), 33% (1/3), 66% (2/3) or 100% (3/3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Texas A&M Health Science Center, Texas A&M University, Trinity College Dublin

4

Agarose Gel Shift Assay for eIF3 Binding

Recombinant eIF3 was expressed and purified from E. coli and native human eIF3 was purified from HeLa cells as previously described32 (link). The gel shift protocol was adapted from 33 (link) and 34 (link). A 0.7% agarose gel was prepared using Agarose Type 1B (Sigma A0576) in buffer consisting of 1× TBE supplemented with 75 mM KCl, and gel and buffer were pre-cooled at 4 °C. For each gel shift, 2 μl water, 1 μl of 5× Binding Buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM Mg(OAc)2, 70 mM KCl, 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.1 mg ml-1 BSA, 2 mM TCEP), 1 μl labeled RNA, and 1 μl of purified eIF3 or protein buffer was added, in the listed order, and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. 1 μl of room temperature 6× non-denaturing loading dye (40% w/v sucrose, with xylene cyanol and bromophenol blue) was added to the reactions and these were loaded on the agarose gel. The gel was run for 1 h at 40 V at 4 °C, buffer was replaced with fresh cold buffer, and the gel was run for another hour at 40 V. The gel was placed on top of positively charged nylon membrane with four pieces of Whatman filter paper underneath, covered in saran wrap, and dried for 1 h at 75 °C on a pre-heated gel drier. The gel was imaged using a phosphoimager.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of California, Berkeley

5

Extraction and Characterization of Tetraena articulata Plant Compounds

T. articulata plant specimens were collected from the desert areas of the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia in August 2019 along with dried leaves from the floor.
Methanolic extracts were prepared as per standard protocol (Wannes et al., 2010 (link)). The different parts of T. articulata were completely air-dried; the fine powder was obtained after grinding 100 g of each plant part (fresh leaves, dry leaves, stem, and root) in a kitchen blender. 12 g of each part was weighed, dissolved in 100% methanol, and were constantly stirring at room temperature for 3 days. Mixtures obtained were filtered through Whatman filter paper in a clean autoclaved glass beaker. The solvent was evaporated completely to get a fine powder of residue. The residue powder was stored at 4 °C and dissolved in 90% methanol for further experiments to evaluate the biological activities of the various residues of different parts of T. articulata plant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Qassim University

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.