The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

23 protocols using ph meter

1

Measuring Total Soluble Solids and pH in Juices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total soluble solids (TSS) in juices were measured using a digital refractometer (Atago PR-32, Tokyo, Japan) and results are given as percentages. The pH of the juices was measured using a pH meter (Hach Co., Loveland, CO, USA) [16 ].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fungal Cell-Free Extracts for AgNP Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The activity level of the fungal cell-free (FCF) extracts in the synthesis of AgNPs was tested based on the studies of Al-Khuzai et al. [19 (link)]. AgNO3 at a concentration of 0.5 mM (AgNO3, Sigma-Aldrich St. Louis, MO, USA) was used, varying the reaction time (1, 3 and 6 h), temperature (20, 45 and 90 °C) and pH (6, 9 and 12), in the water bath (Julabo TW12, Seelbach, Germany). All reactions were conducted in triplicate.
The pH of the FCF extracts was adjusted using a pH meter (Hach, Cork, Ireland), sodium hydroxide (NaOH) and hydrochloric acid (HCl), both chemicals bought from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Ultrapure water and AgNO3 were used as synthesis reaction control in the same reaction conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Water Quality Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine the water quality parameters, water temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO) and pH were determined in situ using the thermometer, portable dissolved oxygen meter and pH meter (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA) [18 ]. Meanwhile, the concentrations of total nitrogen (TN), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N) and total phosphorus (TP) were spectrophotometrically examined using a continuous flow analyzer (Seal Analytical AA3, Norderstedt, Germany) after the water samples were filtered by a polycarbonate membrane (0.22 μm) [22 (link)]. Permanganate index (CODMn) was measured using spectrophotometer with the DR6000 (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). Fe concentration was determined by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA) [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Physicochemical Properties Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The physicochemical properties of the samples were determined using the following methods: The pH was measured using a pH meter (Hach, USA) on site. The total nitrogen (TN), nitrate nitrogen (NO3--N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), and total phosphorus (TP) were measured following the National Standard Methods (Yan et al. 2020 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Soil Characterization After Material Addition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate the soil characteristics after the materials addition, a mixed sample from three points per plot of 0–30 cm-soil layer were taken from soil samplers (φ5 cm) along the diagonal line, on June 2021. Soil samples were air-dried, crushed, sieved (0.149 mm mesh) and stored in sealed plastic bags [29 ]. Soil cores were also collected (using a 200 cm3 cylinder) from each plot, for determination of BD and maximum water-holding capacity [30 ]. SOM was determined by the potassium dichromate oxidation-heating method [31 ]. Hydrolysable nitrogen was determined by the alkaline-hydrolysis diffusion method [32 ]. Cation exchange capacity was determined by the ammonium chloride–ammonium acetate exchange method [33 ]. Soil pH and electrical conductivity were determined using a pH meter (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA) with a measuring range of −2.00 to 14.00, and an electrical conductivity instrument (Leici Company, Shanghai China) with a measuring range of 0.0 to 10.0 ec in the supernatant of 2:5 and 1:5 soil and water mixtures, respectively [34 ,35 ]. Water-soluble Cu was measured using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) on the supernatant of 1:12.5 soil-to-water ratio. The suspension reacted on a reciprocal shaker for 2 h, was centrifuged (1400× g) for 10 min, filtered with a nylon membrane (0.45 mm), and stored in 0.2% trace metal grade HNO3 [36 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Soil Characterization and Cd Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to chemical analysis, the samples were freeze-dried (−80°C), thoroughly ground, and sieved (<0.075 mm). Soil pH was determined using a pH meter (HACH, Loveland, United States) after mixing 10 g of soil with 25 ml of MQ water in a 50 ml conical flask. The total nitrogen (TN) and total organic carbon (TOC) contents were measured using an elemental analyzer (Vario MACRO cube, Elementar, Hanau, Germany). The sieved samples were then completely digested using concentrated hydrofluoric acid and nitric acid (1:5, v/v) before elemental analysis (Xiao et al., 2021b (link)). After digestion, the contents of Cd were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, Agilent, 7700x, California, United States; Liu et al., 2020 (link); Wang et al., 2021 (link)). To improve the reliability of ICP-MS, certified references (SLRS-5 and GBW07310) were used during the measurements following our previous studies (Xiao et al., 2021b (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterizing Garden Waste Decomposition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The composite samples were retrieved from the serum bottles at predetermined intervals and subsequently centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.45-μm membrane for the subsequent analysis of soluble chemical oxygen demand (sCOD) and filtered through a 0.22-μm membrane for the analysis of VFAs.
The COD, TS, and volatile solids (VS) were determined with standard methods (APHA, 2005 ). Acetate, propionate, butyrate, valerate, and caproate were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, California) using 5 mM H2SO4 as the mobile phase (Huang et al., 2022 (link)). The cumulative VFAs, calculated as acetate (g/L), were the sum of acetate, propionate, isobutyrate, and n-butyrate during fermentation. pH was measured with a pH meter (HACH, United States). The gas volume collected in a 1-L sampling bag was measured using an air pump every 1–3 days, and then, the gas was transferred back into the bag. The hydrogen content in both the gaseous samples in the sampling bag and the headspace was measured using gas chromatography apparatus equipped with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD) (Tianmei, GC7900, China). In addition, the decomposition of garden waste was assessed by Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy (Bruker; VERTEX 70; Germany) through a full scan across the wavenumber range of 400–4,000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Urban Lake Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To measure the water quality of the urban lakes, the pH, nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonia nitrogen (NH4+-N), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), permanganate index (CODMn), Fe and Mn concentrations were measured. The pH was measured using a pH meter (Hach, USA) in the field. Nitrite nitrogen (NO2-N), nitrate nitrogen (NO3-N), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N), and total nitrogen (TN) concentrations were determined using a flow injection analyzer (FIA) (Seal Analytical AA3, Norderstedt, Germany) based on a previously described method.22 TP was measured using a spectrophotometer (DR6000, Hach, USA). The Fe and Mn concentrations were measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS) (ELAN® DRC-E, PerkinElmer, USA).22 To measure the algal biomass, the algal cell concentration was determined using an optical microscope (BX51, Olympus, Japan) and the cell concentration (cells per L) was calculated using the method described previously.23 (link) Each experiment was performed in triplicate (n = 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Physicochemical Analysis of Cheese Batches

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Physicochemical analyses were conducted according to the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists [23 ]. They were performed for each production on days 0, 15, 30, and 60 for batches A, B, C, and D, by taking the homogenized cheese used for microbial analyses. The samples were homogenized in ultrapure water to be measured with a pH meter (Hach Lange Spain S.L.U., Barcelona, Spain) previously calibrated with standard solutions (Scharlau Chemie S.A.). The aw was measured with a Novasina Lab Master Water activity meter model aw SPRINT-TH 300 (Novasina AG, Lachen, Switzerland). Moisture content was calculated through the dehydration of samples at 105 °C with the addition of previously dehydrated washed sea sand (Scharlau Chemie S.A.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Biogas Production from Carbon Cloth

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Concentrations of NH 4 + -N and COD were determined following Standard Methods (Association, 2005) (link). Volatile fatty acids (VFAs) were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography (Bio-Rad; Hercules; California) using 5 mM H 2 SO 4 as the mobile phase. pH was measured with a HACH pH meter (HACH, USA), and total potassium was measured with an ICP instrument (Agilent, USA).
Biogas volume in the 10-L sampling bag was measured every 48 h with an air pump and CH 4 and CO 2 composition was analyzed by gas chromatography (TianMei, GC7900, China) with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). The surface morphologies of the carbon cloth were characterized using scanning electron microscopy (Compass Technology Co, Hitachi S480, China). Carbon cloth and carbon cloth modified with riboflavin were also scanned with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (Compass Technology Co, Thermo Scientific Nicolet iS5, China) from 400 cm -1 to 4,000 cm -1 .
The methane accumulation simulation curve was fitted using the First-order equation (Eq. 1) to estimate the methane accumulation potential of the reactors.
Where B max is Maximum cumulative methane production (mL) and k h is First order model constants (/d).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!