Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Market Availability & Pricing

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.

78 protocols using «dmi6000 cs»

1

Intracellular Localization of GDNPs

2025
4T1 cells were incubated with Dio-dye-labelled GDNPs for 6 h, followed by organelle staining. Mitochondria were stained with a mitochondrial red fluorescent probe (MitoTracker Red CMXRos, 1:10,000) for 45 min; ER was stained with an ER red fluorescent probe (ER-Tracker Red, 1:3000) for 30 min, and lysosomes were stained with a lysosomal red fluorescent probe (Lyso-Tracker Red, 1:15,000) for 2 h. Finally, confocal laser scanning microscopy (Leica DMI6000CS, GER) was used to observe the localization of GDNPs in different organelles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Tracking Lp Migration in Pf Biofilms

2025
The migration of Lp (both under 80 RPM – 80 RPM and 80 RPM – Stag) within the pre-established Pf biofilms was tracked over 24 h by removing biofilm coupons from the plates at the following timepoints: 5, 15, 30 and 45 min, and then every hour after spiking until the 24 h. Lp was successfully stained red using a 16S rRNA PNA probe as already reported [14 (link),39 (link)]. Biofilm samples were observed using a helium-neon laser at 565 nm and a 405-diode at 398 nm and using a 60 × water objective lens (Leica HC PL APO CS, Leica Microsystems, Germany) in an inverted microscope Leica DMI6000-CS. A minimum of three z-stacks of horizontal plane images (512 × 512 pixels, corresponding to 387.5 × 387.5 μm) with a z-step of 0.36 μm were captured. For image analysis, green corresponds to P. fluorescens cells (due to the auto-fluorescence conferred by the production of pyoverdines [40 (link)]) and red corresponds to L. pneumophila.
Three-dimensional (3D) projections of biofilm structures were reconstructed from z-stacks using the "Easy 3D" tool in IMARIS 9.1 software (Bitplane, Switzerland). The orthogonal perspectives were also obtained. To quantify the biovolume (the total volume of biomass, μm³, in a given area of the biofilm, divided by the substratum surface area, μm2) of each bacterium, the COMSTAT2 plugin for ImageJ was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Confocal Microscopy for Germ Cell Analysis

2024
Whole-mount immunofluorescent staining and whole-mount FISH, intact gonadal fragments were subjected to analysis using confocal laser scanning microscopy to identify different germ cell lines (gonial cells, meiocytes) and their ploidy. In addition, gonadal tissue fragments, stained only with DAPI, were examined by confocal microscopy to observe gonadal microanatomy and the distribution of different germ cell lines throughout the gonad. Tissue fragments were placed in a drop of DABCO antifade solution containing 1 mg/ml DAPI. Confocal laser scanning microscopy was carried out using a Leica TCS SP5 microscope based on the inverted microscope Leica DMI 6000 CS (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Specimens were analyzed using HC PL APO 40 × objective. Diode and argon lasers were used to excite the fluorescent dye DAPI and Alexa488 fluorochrome, respectively. The images were captured and processed using LAS AF software (Leica Microsystems, Germany).
Initially, the 3D FISH signals were manually assessed as the brightest dots within the cell nucleus using Leica Las AF software. Further discrimination of signals within the nucleus was performed by analyzing the 3D volume of cell nuclei created by Imaris 7.7.1 (Bitplane) software. For 3D-volume rendering and surface reconstruction of confocal image stacks, a region of interest (ROI) was cropped, maintaining image voxel dimensions. Isosurfaces of multichannel images were created for each channel separately, with automated parameters threshold for channel intensity cutoffs. ROI isosurfaces were split into separate surface objects for individual nuclei (DAPI channel) or FISH signals (Alexa 488 or rhodamine channels). The results from the counting of isosurfaces for FISH signals (Alexa 488 or rhodamine channels) were compared with the results from the initial manual counting of signals, and in the case of their correspondence, such cells were used for the analysis. In instances where adjacent nuclei were inseparable (DAPI channel), isosurface reconstruction was done via a “manual creation” tab. To highlight germ cells, only surface objects belonging to individual germ cells were retained in the reconstruction.
Chromosomal slides with pachytene and diplotene chromosomes were analyzed by wide-field and fluorescence microscopy. Meiotic chromosomes after FISH and immunofluorescent staining were analyzed using Provis AX70 Olympus microscopes equipped with standard fluorescence filter sets. Microphotographs of chromosomes were captured by CCD camera (DP30W Olympus) with the assistance of Olympus Acquisition Software. Microphotographs were finally adjusted and arranged in Adobe Photoshop CS6 software; Adobe Illustrator was used for scheme drawing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Whole-mount FISH for Frog Gonad Analysis

2024
Whole-mount FISH was performed on gonads dissected from tadpoles according to Dedukh et al.48 . Gonadal tissues were incubated in 0.5% solution of Triton X100 in 1× PBS for 4–5 h, washed in 1× PBS and impregnated in 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, and 2× SSC for 3–4 h at 37 °C. Hybridization was performed either only with probe to RrS1 (20 ng/µl) or with the usage of the mixture of probes to RrS1 and PlesSat01-48 repeats (10 ng/µl of each probe). Hybridization mixture contained 50% formamide, 2× SSC and 10% dextran sulfate and salmon sperm DNA (with 10–50-fold excess compared to the probe concentration). After denaturation of tissues at 72 °C for 15 min and their incubation for at least 24 h at RT, tissues were washed three times in 0.2× SSC at 50 °C for 15 min each. Afterwards tissues were transferred in 1% blocking solution (Roche) prepared in 4× SSC for 1 h at RT. Biotin and digoxigenin were detected by streptavidin conjugated with Alexa 488 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA) and anti-digoxigenin antibodies conjugated with rhodamine (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA, USA), correspondingly. After incubation with streptavidin and rhodamine overnight at RT, tissues were washed in 4× SSC for 15 min tissues and stained with DAPI (1 µg/µl) (Sigma) prepared in 1× PBS at RT overnight. Prior examination, tissues were placed in a drop of Vectashield antifade solution and analyzed using Leica TCS SP5 confocal laser scanning microscope based on the inverted microscope Leica DMI 6000 CS (Leica Microsystems, Germany). Diode, argon and helium-neon lasers were used to excite the fluorescent dyes DAPI, fluorochromes Alexa488 and rhodamine, respectively. LAS AF software (Leica Microsystems, Germany) was used for image capture and processing. Based on the FISH signals, spermatids with two L signals and weak R signals (based on the exposition value) were evaluated as haploid L spermatids; spermatids with no L and strong R signals were assessed as haploid R spermatids; and spermatids with one and three signals of L probe together with strong or weak signals of R probe were assessed as aneuploid. Metaphases with a combination of R and L univalents and metaphase plates exhibiting abnormal pairing of R and L chromosomes in bivalents were classified as unusual. Metaphase plates with incomplete chromosome numbers (less than 13 in haploid stages or less than 26 in diploid stages) were identified as aneuploid. Based on previous studies of various water frog populations31 (link),48 , we conservatively estimate a rate of 15% for “mistakes” in micronuclei with incorrectly eliminated genomes. In these populations, cells with incorrectly eliminated chromosomes did not produce fertile gametes and were not represented in the progeny. In our case, we use a threshold of monospermic males as of those with observed up to 15% of R : L spermatids.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol

2024
One × 104 cells were seeded in 12-well cell culture plates and transfected with each siRNA as described. When needed, samples were also transfected after 24 h, using Lipofectamine LTX (Life Technologies). Next, cells were washed with PBS, fixed with ice-cold methanol for 10 min, permeabilized with 0.2% Triton X-100 solution for 20 min and then blocked for 20 min with 2.5% BSA in PBS. Cells were then incubated with appropriate primary antibodies for 30 min, washed three times with PBS, and then incubated with appropriate Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated (Invitrogen, A21202) or Alexa Fluor 555-conjugated (Invitrogen, A31570) secondary antibodies. Nuclei were stained with 1.5 μM 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) in PBS for 5 min. Coverslips were mounted in fluorescence mounting medium (Dako, S3023). Samples were visualized on a TSC SP5 confocal microscope (Leica, 5100000750) installed on an inverted LEICA DMI 6000CS (10741320) microscope using an oil immersion PlanApo 40 × 1.25 NA. Images were acquired using the LAS AF acquisition software (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.