Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Trichloroacetic acid

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, United Kingdom, India, Sao Tome and Principe, Italy, China, Poland, Australia, France, Japan, Spain, Macao, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Ireland, Switzerland, Portugal, Indonesia, Croatia, Mexico, Singapore, Belgium, New Zealand, Thailand, Sweden, Israel, Czechia, Denmark, South Africa
About the product

Trichloroacetic acid is a colorless, crystalline chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It serves as a reagent and is commonly employed in analytical chemistry and biochemistry procedures. The compound's primary function is to precipitate proteins, making it a useful tool for sample preparation and analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Trichloroacetic acid is a chemical product commercially available through the Merck Group and its authorized distributors. The price typically ranges from $55.90 to $255.00, depending on the quantity and purity level. Merck offers this product as an in-stock item, and it has not been discontinued or replaced.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

2 603 protocols using «trichloroacetic acid»

1

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation Protocol

2025
Methanol, acetone, acetic acid (glacial) 100%, 2-thiobarbituric acid (TBA), hydrochloric acid ACS (37%), 2,4,6-Tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), butylated hydroxyanisole (BHA), and 3,5-Di-tert-4butylhydroxytoluene (BHT) were purchased from Merck (Darmstad, Germany). Iron (III) chloride (97%), sodium acetate anhydrous (≥99%), sodium phosphate monobasic monohydrate ACS (≥98%), sodium phosphate dibasic ACS (≥99%), sodium carbonate ACS (≥99.5%), Folin and Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent 2 N, trichloroacetic acid (TCA) ACS (≥99%), 1,1,3,3-Tetraethoxypropane (≥96%), gallic acid, flourescein sodium salt, (±)-6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2′-azobis(2-methyl-propionamidine) dihydrochloride (AAPH), phenolic acids (gallic, syringic, ferulic, chlorogenic, caffeic, and p-coumaric), and flavonoids (catechin, rutin, quercetin, luteolin, kaempferol, epicatechin, myricetin, and isorhamnetin) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Oxidative Stress Response Assays

2025
LPS from Escherichia coli 055:B5 (No. L-2880), Kolliphor EL, disulfiram DSF, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), 2′,7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (DCFH-DA), 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein (DCF), p-phenylenediamine, zinc acetate, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), gelatin, thionine, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 5,5′-dithio-bis-2-nitrobenzoic acid (DTNB), bovine serum albumin (BSA), potassium cyanide (KCN), and potassium rhodanate (KSCN) were provided by Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (Darmstadt, Germany). Formaldehyde, ammonia (NH3), barium chloride (BaCl2), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium chloride (NaCl), ethanol, ferric chloride (FeCl3), hydrochloric acid (HCl), ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt (EDTA), sodium dicarbonate (Na2CO3), potassium sodium tartrate, and copper sulfate (CuSO4) were obtained from the Polish Chemical Reagent Company (P.O.Ch., Gliwice, Poland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Comprehensive Antioxidant Assays Protocol

2025
Folin–Ciocalteu's phenol reagent (FC reagent), iron (II) chloride (FeCl2), iron (III) chloride (FeCl3), potassium ferricyanide [K3Fe(CN)6], sodium chloride (NaCl), aluminum chloride (AlCl3), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), formic acid (HCOOH), acetic acid (CH3COOH), hydrochloric acid (HCl), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), acetonitrile (HPLC grade), ethanol (HPLC grade), 2,2‐diphenyl‐1‐picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), β‐carotene, linoleic acid, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), lysine acetylsalicylic acid (ASL), gallic acid (98%), rutin, and catechin were purchased from Sigma‐Aldrich.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Phytochemical and Antioxidant Assays

2025
Na2SO4, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent (FCR), sodium carbonate, gallic acid, aluminum nitrate, potassium acetate, quercetin, aluminum chloride (AlCl3), sodium acetate (C2H3NaO2), DPPH, ABTS, ferric chloride (FeCl3), phosphate buffer, potassium ferricyanide solution (K3[Fe(CN)6]), trichloroacetic acid (TCA), trolox, ascorbic acid, acetylthiocholine iodide, butyrylthiocholine chloride, 5,5′-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB), and galantamine were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade. Bacterial strains were obtained from the Pasteur Institute, Algiers, Algeria.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Quantitative Analysis of Brain Barrier Permeability

2025
After injecting 5 μl of 10% Evans blue (EB) (Sigma, Cat# E2129) solution into the mice either by ICO or intravenous injection (IV). 500 μl of 2.5% tribromoethanol-tert-amyl alcohol (Nanjing Aibei Biotechnology, Cat# M2920) solution was intraperitoneally administered for anesthesia at ten minutes, thirty minutes, and sixty minutes. Eye extraction was used for blood collection and separation of plasma. This procedure was followed by cardiac perfusion with ice-cold PBS to remove blood. Skull, dura mater, and brain were further harvested separately with the brain microscopically dissected into cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. EB was extracted from the minced tissues soaked in 50% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma, Cat# T0699) for 24 h, and the absorbance of solution was measured at 620 nm using a microplate reader. Different concentrations of EB solution were used as standard solutions to calculate the concentration of EB in the test samples, and normalized to the weight of each tissue. Additionally, after the mice were injected with 5 μl of 10% EB solution through the skull bone marrow, they were anesthetized at 0.5 h, 1 h, 2 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h by intraperitoneal injections of 500 μl of 2.5% tribromoethanol-tert-amyl alcohol solution. The brain tissues were then immersed in a 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution (Aladin, Cat# C104188) after transcardial PBS perfusion, dehydrated using 30% sucrose (BioFroxx, Cat# 1245GR500), and subsequently frozen and sectioned (with a section thickness of 20 μm). Whole-brain scan was conducted using Texas red fluorescence pathway.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «trichloroacetic acid»

1

Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Plasma and Erythrocytes

The static ORP (sORP) marker was determined using the RedoxSYS diagnostic system (Luoxis Diagnostics, Inc., Englewood, CO, USA) as previously described (17 (link),18 (link)). This value is indicative of the integrated balance of oxidants and reductants in a specimen and is presented in mV. Using this innovative method, 20 µl of plasma were applied to disposable sensors designed by Luoxis Diagnostics, Inc., which were inserted into the RedoxSYS diagnostic system and the sORP value was reported within 4 min.
For the determination of the levels of TBARS, an assay was used based on the study by Keles et al (19 (link)). TBARS is a commonly and frequently used method to determine the lipid peroxidation (20 (link)). In accordance with this method, 100 µl of plasma were mixed with 500 µl of 35% trichloroacetic acid (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 500 µl of Tris-HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 200 mmol/l, pH 7.4) followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature. A total of 1 ml of 2 M sodium sulfate and 55 mmol/l TBA solution were added and the samples were then incubated at 95°C for 45 min. The samples were cooled on ice for 5 min and were vortexed following the addition of 1 ml of 70% TCA. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 3 min and the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). A baseline absorbance was taken into account by running a blank along with all samples during the measurement. The calculation of the TBARS concentration was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of malondialdehyde.
The GSH concentration was measured as previously described in the study by Reddy et al (21 ). A total of 20 µl of erythrocyte lysate treated with 5% TCA was mixed with 660 µl of 67 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 8.0) and 330 µl of 1 mmol/l 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). The samples were then incubated in the dark at room temperature for 45 min and the absorbance was read at 412 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi). The GSH concentration was calculated on the basis of calibration curves made using commercial standards.
The concentration of CARB, an index of protein oxidation, was determined based on the method described in the study by Patsoukis et al (22 (link)). In this assay, 50 µl of 20% TCA were added to 50 µl of plasma and this mixture was then incubated in an ice bath for 15 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 500 µl of 10 mmol/l 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH; in 2.5 N HCl) for the sample, or 500 µl of 2.5 N HCl for the blank, were added to the pellet. The samples were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 1 h with intermittent vortexing every 15 min and were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of 10% TCA was added, vortexed and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of ethanol-ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v) was added, vortexed and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. This washing step was repeated twice. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of 5 M urea (pH 2.3) was added, vortexed and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 3 min at 4°C and the absorbance was read at 375 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi). The calculation of the CARB concentration was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of DNPH. Total plasma protein was assayed using Bradford reagent (Sigma, Hamburg, Germany).
The determination of TAC was based on the method described in the study by Janaszewska and Bartosz (23 (link)). Briefly, 20 µl of plasma were added respectively to 480 µl of 10 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) and 500 µl of 0.1 mmol/l 1,1-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and the samples were incubated in the dark for 60 min at room temperature. The samples were then centrifuged for 3 min at 20,000 × g and the absorbance was read at 520 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi).
The measurement of CAT activity was carried out as previously described by Aebi (24 (link)). In particular, 4 µl οf erythrocyte lysate (diluted 1:10) were added to 2,991 µl οf 67 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 10 min. A total of 5 µl of 30% H2O2 was added to the samples and the change in absorbance was immediately read at 240 nm [using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi)] for 130 sec. The calculation of CAT activity was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of H2O2. Each assay was performed twice in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Extraction and Quantification of Plant Phytohormones

To quantify plant endogenous ABA and SA content, the ABA and SA of inoculated and non-inoculated samples were extracted from freeze-dried samples (three replicates). The quantification and extraction of ABA were performed using a previous protocol [63 (link),64 (link)] with some modifications. Around 150 mg of powder was homogenized in 2 mL of 90% methanol including 15 mg of butylated hydroxytoluene and 20 mL of 2% glacial acetic acid. The homogenate was incubated for 48 h at 4 °C, dried using a rotary evaporator, and methylated with diazomethane for further analysis. ABA was quantitatively assessed by GC-MS/SIM (5973 Network Mass Selective Detector and 6890N Network GC System; Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA) in three identical repeats.
The lyophilized sample was further crushed into fine powder in liquid nitrogen for SA quantification following a previous method [65 (link)]. Additionally, the powdered sample (0.2 g) was mixed with 2 mL of 90% methanol (Sigma, Germany) and centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000× g. The methanol in the supernatant was evaporated in a vacuum centrifuge and the sample was resuspended in 3 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma, Germany). The upper organic layer was further mixed with a solution of isopropanol, ethyl acetate, and cyclopentane (1:49.5:49.5 v/v) (Duksan, South Korea) and vigorously vortexed. The uppermost layer was transferred to a 4 mL tube and vacuum dried. Prior to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the dried pellet was mixed with 1 mL of HPLC mobile phase and SA was quantified through fluorescence detection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential Assay

A modified FRAP assay was used to assess the ferric reducing capacity of plant extracts [65 (link)]. The reduction of ferric iron (Fe3+) to ferrous iron (Fe2+) by antioxidants present in the samples is how the assay determines the antioxidant potential. Blue coloration results from the conversion of ferric iron (Fe3+) to ferrous iron (Fe2+).
Equal amounts of 0.1 g dry extracts were dissolved in 100 mL 50% ethanol for every plant extract used in our study. Eight corresponding volumes of each obtained solution were brought into volumetric flasks and adjusted to 10 mL by adding the same solvent as above. An amount of 2.5 mL of each diluted solution was mixed with phosphate buffer (pH 6.6, Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) and 2.5 mL K3(FeCN)6 1% (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) before being heated to 50 °C for 20 min. 2.5 mL trichloroacetic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) was added to each sample. Furthermore, 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL FeCl3 0.1% (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) were added to 2.5 mL of each of the resulting solutions, the samples being left thereafter idle for 10 min. The change in the absorbance at 700 nm was measured relative to a blank sample obtained by mixing 5 mL distilled water with 0.5 mL FeCl3 0.1%.
The antioxidant capacity was calculated using the IC50 (half of the antioxidant effect—IC—effective concentration) value (mg/mL), which represents the solution concentration for which the absorbance has a value of 0.5.
Different extract volumes were tested in order to reach the absorbance value of 0.5, due to the variability of plant characteristics and the nonuniformity of phytochemical profiles of plant extracts (experimental values closer to the target value result in more accurate approximation—IC50 for y = 0.5). The optimized values have been set as mentioned above in order to conduct an appropriate comparative study within the same technique and between other methods of assessing the antioxidant activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Western Blot Analysis of Exosomal Proteins

Proteins from all fractions (800 µL) were precipitated using trichloroacetic acid (20% final concentration; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). From each fraction, equal amounts of protein (4 µg) were dissolved in non-reducing sample buffer, boiled and loaded on 8–16% gradient PAGE gels (Biorad), and proteins were transferred to PVDF membrane (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Blots were incubated with anti-CD63 (BD, clone H5C6) or anti-CD9 (BD, clone M-L13), extensively washed and then incubated with a goat-anti-mouse (GAM)-horseradish peroxidase (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Subsequently, the PVDF membranes were incubated with a 5-fold diluted peroxidase substrate (LumiLight, Roche Diagnostics, Almere, The Netherlands) for 5 minutes, followed by analysis of luminescence using a LAS4000 luminescence image analyser (Fuji, Valhalla, NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Assaying Virulence Factors of P. aeruginosa

Overnight culture of P. aeruginosa was inoculated in AB medium with or without 6-gingerol (0–100 μM) in 50 ml conical tubes and incubated using a shaking incubator at 250 rpm at 37°C for 24 hrs. The culture was then centrifuged at 12,000 g at 4°C for 5 min. For assaying exoprotease activity, 150 μL supernatant was mixed with 250 μL of 0.2% azocasein solution which was prepared by dissolving 0.1 g azocasein (Sigma Aldrich) in 50 ml of 50 mM Tris/HCl. The mixture was incubated at 4°C for 4 h without agitation. After reaction, 1.2 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma Aldrich) was added to the mixture and incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The mixture was then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant was mixed in 1.4 ml of 1 M NaOH, and exoprotease activity was estimated by measuring OD at 595 nm in a spectrophotometer48 (link). For assaying pyocyanin activity, crude pyocyanin was initially extracted by mixing 5 ml supernatant of the trichloroacetic acid containing samples with 3 ml of 100% chloroform. 1 ml of 0.2 N HCl was then added to the mixture to re-extract pyocyanin. Pyocyanin activity was estimated by measuring OD at 520 nm in a spectrophotometer49 (link). For assaying rhamnolipid activity, crude rhamnolipid was initially extracted twice by mixing 500 μL cell supernatant of overnight culture with 1 ml of 100% diethyl ether (JUNSEI, Tokyo, Japan). The ether fraction was evaporated to dryness. The dry sample was eluted in 500 μL deionized water, and 100 μL of the elution was mixed with 900 μL Orcinal solution (0.19% Orcinal (Sigma Aldrich) in 53% H2SO4). The mixture was boiled for 30 min, and then cooled at room temperature for 15 min. Rhamnolipid activity was estimated by measuring OD at 421 nm in a spectrophotometer50 (link). Exoprotease, pyocyanin, and rhamnolipid activity was normalized using the cell culture OD at 595 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.