Trichloroacetic acid
Trichloroacetic acid is a colorless, crystalline chemical compound used in various laboratory applications. It serves as a reagent and is commonly employed in analytical chemistry and biochemistry procedures. The compound's primary function is to precipitate proteins, making it a useful tool for sample preparation and analysis.
Lab products found in correlation
Market Availability & Pricing
Trichloroacetic acid is a chemical product commercially available through the Merck Group and its authorized distributors. The price typically ranges from $55.90 to $255.00, depending on the quantity and purity level. Merck offers this product as an in-stock item, and it has not been discontinued or replaced.
Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.
Is this product still available?
Get pricing insights and sourcing optionsSpelling variants (same manufacturer)
Similar products (other manufacturers)
The spelling variants listed below correspond to different ways the product may be referred to in scientific literature.
These variants have been automatically detected by our extraction engine, which groups similar formulations based on semantic similarity.
Product FAQ
2 603 protocols using «trichloroacetic acid»
Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation Protocol
Oxidative Stress Response Assays
Comprehensive Antioxidant Assays Protocol
Phytochemical and Antioxidant Assays
Quantitative Analysis of Brain Barrier Permeability
Top 5 protocols citing «trichloroacetic acid»
Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Plasma and Erythrocytes
For the determination of the levels of TBARS, an assay was used based on the study by Keles et al (19 (link)). TBARS is a commonly and frequently used method to determine the lipid peroxidation (20 (link)). In accordance with this method, 100 µl of plasma were mixed with 500 µl of 35% trichloroacetic acid (Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and 500 µl of Tris-HCl (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA; 200 mmol/l, pH 7.4) followed by incubation for 10 min at room temperature. A total of 1 ml of 2 M sodium sulfate and 55 mmol/l TBA solution were added and the samples were then incubated at 95°C for 45 min. The samples were cooled on ice for 5 min and were vortexed following the addition of 1 ml of 70% TCA. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 3 min and the absorbance of the supernatant was read at 530 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). A baseline absorbance was taken into account by running a blank along with all samples during the measurement. The calculation of the TBARS concentration was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of malondialdehyde.
The GSH concentration was measured as previously described in the study by Reddy et al (21 ). A total of 20 µl of erythrocyte lysate treated with 5% TCA was mixed with 660 µl of 67 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 8.0) and 330 µl of 1 mmol/l 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB). The samples were then incubated in the dark at room temperature for 45 min and the absorbance was read at 412 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi). The GSH concentration was calculated on the basis of calibration curves made using commercial standards.
The concentration of CARB, an index of protein oxidation, was determined based on the method described in the study by Patsoukis et al (22 (link)). In this assay, 50 µl of 20% TCA were added to 50 µl of plasma and this mixture was then incubated in an ice bath for 15 min and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 500 µl of 10 mmol/l 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH; in 2.5 N HCl) for the sample, or 500 µl of 2.5 N HCl for the blank, were added to the pellet. The samples were incubated in the dark at room temperature for 1 h with intermittent vortexing every 15 min and were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of 10% TCA was added, vortexed and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of ethanol-ethyl acetate (1:1 v/v) was added, vortexed and centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. This washing step was repeated twice. The supernatant was discarded and 1 ml of 5 M urea (pH 2.3) was added, vortexed and incubated at 37°C for 15 min. The samples were centrifuged at 15,000 × g for 3 min at 4°C and the absorbance was read at 375 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi). The calculation of the CARB concentration was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of DNPH. Total plasma protein was assayed using Bradford reagent (Sigma, Hamburg, Germany).
The determination of TAC was based on the method described in the study by Janaszewska and Bartosz (23 (link)). Briefly, 20 µl of plasma were added respectively to 480 µl of 10 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) and 500 µl of 0.1 mmol/l 1,1-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) and the samples were incubated in the dark for 60 min at room temperature. The samples were then centrifuged for 3 min at 20,000 × g and the absorbance was read at 520 nm using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi).
The measurement of CAT activity was carried out as previously described by Aebi (24 (link)). In particular, 4 µl οf erythrocyte lysate (diluted 1:10) were added to 2,991 µl οf 67 mmol/l sodium potassium phosphate (pH 7.4) and the samples were incubated at 37°C for 10 min. A total of 5 µl of 30% H2O2 was added to the samples and the change in absorbance was immediately read at 240 nm [using a spectrophotometer (Hitachi U-1900; serial no. 2023-029; Hitachi)] for 130 sec. The calculation of CAT activity was based on the molar extinction co-efficient of H2O2. Each assay was performed twice in triplicate.
Extraction and Quantification of Plant Phytohormones
The lyophilized sample was further crushed into fine powder in liquid nitrogen for SA quantification following a previous method [65 (link)]. Additionally, the powdered sample (0.2 g) was mixed with 2 mL of 90% methanol (Sigma, Germany) and centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000× g. The methanol in the supernatant was evaporated in a vacuum centrifuge and the sample was resuspended in 3 mL of 5% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma, Germany). The upper organic layer was further mixed with a solution of isopropanol, ethyl acetate, and cyclopentane (1:49.5:49.5 v/v) (Duksan, South Korea) and vigorously vortexed. The uppermost layer was transferred to a 4 mL tube and vacuum dried. Prior to high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), the dried pellet was mixed with 1 mL of HPLC mobile phase and SA was quantified through fluorescence detection.
Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Potential Assay
Equal amounts of 0.1 g dry extracts were dissolved in 100 mL 50% ethanol for every plant extract used in our study. Eight corresponding volumes of each obtained solution were brought into volumetric flasks and adjusted to 10 mL by adding the same solvent as above. An amount of 2.5 mL of each diluted solution was mixed with phosphate buffer (pH 6.6, Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) and 2.5 mL K3(FeCN)6 1% (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) before being heated to 50 °C for 20 min. 2.5 mL trichloroacetic acid (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) was added to each sample. Furthermore, 2.5 mL of distilled water and 0.5 mL FeCl3 0.1% (Sigma–Aldrich, Hamburg, Germany) were added to 2.5 mL of each of the resulting solutions, the samples being left thereafter idle for 10 min. The change in the absorbance at 700 nm was measured relative to a blank sample obtained by mixing 5 mL distilled water with 0.5 mL FeCl3 0.1%.
The antioxidant capacity was calculated using the IC50 (half of the antioxidant effect—IC—effective concentration) value (mg/mL), which represents the solution concentration for which the absorbance has a value of 0.5.
Different extract volumes were tested in order to reach the absorbance value of 0.5, due to the variability of plant characteristics and the nonuniformity of phytochemical profiles of plant extracts (experimental values closer to the target value result in more accurate approximation—IC50 for y = 0.5). The optimized values have been set as mentioned above in order to conduct an appropriate comparative study within the same technique and between other methods of assessing the antioxidant activity.
Western Blot Analysis of Exosomal Proteins
Assaying Virulence Factors of P. aeruginosa
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!