Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Glacial acetic acid

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, Spain, Canada, Australia, France, Singapore, Switzerland, Belgium, Sao Tome and Principe, Brazil, China, Poland, Chile, Ireland, Japan, Portugal, Sweden, Macao, Indonesia, Netherlands, Malaysia, Austria, Pakistan, Croatia, Israel, Finland, Thailand, New Zealand, Mexico
About the product

Glacial acetic acid is a colorless, odorous, and corrosive liquid used as a laboratory reagent. It has a chemical formula of CH3COOH and a concentration of 99.7% or higher. Glacial acetic acid is commonly used in various analytical and research applications, serving as a solvent, catalyst, and pH modifier.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Glacial acetic acid is commercially available from Merck Group and its authorized distributors. Pricing can vary depending on packaging size and the specific distributor. For example, Fisher Scientific offers a 1-liter bottle for €137.00 and a 2.5-liter bottle for €373.12. Please note that prices may differ based on your location and the chosen distributor.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

2 241 protocols using «glacial acetic acid»

1

Rituximab Antibody Purification and Characterization

2025
The chimeric monoclonal antibody rituximab
(cat. no. MSQC17), along with essential reagents including pepsin
(cat. no. 9001-75-6), mercepto-ethylamine (MEA) (cat. no. 641022),
and dithiothreitol (DTT) (cat. no. 12-3-3483), was procured from Sigma-Aldrich
without requiring additional purification. Chemicals such as monosodium
phosphate monohydrate (cat# 10049-21-5), disodium phosphate (dibasic)
(cat#13472-35-0), citric acid monohydrate (cat# 5949-29-1), trisodium
citrate dihydrate (cat# 4-3-6132), bovine serum albumin (cat# 9048-46-8),
sodium chloride (NaCl) (cat# 7647-14-5), glacial acetic acid (cat#
64-19-7), methanol (cat#67-56-1, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA)
(cat# 6381-92-6), sodium carbonate (cat#497-19-8), trisma base (cat#
77-86-1), glycine (cat# 56-40-6), glycerol (cat# 56-81-5), sodium
dodecyl sulfate (SDS) (cat# 151-21-3), and iodoacetamide (cat#144-48-9)
were also sourced from Sigma-Aldrich. Additionally, hexamethylenediamine
(HMD) (cat. no. 124-09-4) and 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide
(EDC) (cat. no. 1892-57-5) were obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industries.
Supporting information such as bromophenol blue (cat. no. 115-39-9),
Coomassie Brilliant Blue R-250 (cat. no. 6104-59-2),
Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (cat. no. 23235), Ammonium Persulfate
(APS) (cat. no. 7727-54-0), tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) (cat.
no. 110-18-9), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) (cat. no. 7647-01-0) were
purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Benchmark Precision Plus Protein Dual
Color Standards (cat. no. 1610374) were procured from Bio-Rad. The
water used in the experiments was obtained from a Milli-Q purification
system with a resistance of 18.2 MΩ. UV–vis absorbance
measurements were conducted using a BioTek Epoch 2 microplate spectrophotometer
equipped with a Xenon lamp. Gel images were captured by using a ChemiDoc
Bio-Rad GS Image Lab 900 densitometer. The physiological temperature
conditions for the antibody were maintained using a Hera Cell 150i.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Antioxidant Activity Assay Protocol

2025
Sodium carbonate, Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, 2,4,6-Tri-(2-pyridyl)-s-triazin (TPTZ) reagent, ascorbic acid, iron (III) chloride, hydrochloric acid, glacial acetic acid, potassium persulfate, and 2,2-azinobis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt (ABTS) were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany); gallic acid and Trolox were from Honeywell Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Sodium acetate was from Panreac (Barcelona, Spain). All chemicals were used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Peptide-loaded Chitosan Nanoparticles

2025
CM11 (Mw = 1414.87 Da, Seq = WKLFKKILKVL) and PreS1 (Mw = 3133.3 Da, Seq = CPNFDWDPNNSNAGFAPDLQHDPFFGLP) peptides were purchased from Synpeptide Co.,Ltd (Shanghai, China). CS with deacetylation degree of 85% and medium molecular weight (Mw = 90–310 kDa), Tripolyphosphate (TPP), dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)- 2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (USA). 1-Ethyl − 3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide (EDC), N-hydroxy sulfosuccinimide (NHS) and glacial acetic acid were purchased from Merck (Germany). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were obtained from Gibco (USA). HepG2 (Human liver cancer cell line), A549 (Human lung cancer cell line), and Hu02 (Human normal fibroblast) cells were obtained from the National Center of Genetic and Biological Resources of Iran.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Comprehensive Analytical Reagents

2025
Absolute ethanol, (L)-tartaric acid (99.5 %), sodium hydroxide (99 %), Folin-Ciocaletu reagent (2 N), gallic acid (98 %), sodium carbonate (99 %), ammonium sulphate (99 %), bovine serum albumin (99 %), potassium metabisulfite (97 %), potassium tartrate (99.5 %), hydrochloric acid (37 %), glacial acetic acid (100 %), sodium chloride (99.5 %) ammonium dihydrogen phosphate (99 %), orto-phosphoric acid (85 %), rutin hydrate (94 %), myricetin (96 %), quercetin hydrate (95 %), and malvidin 3-glucoside chloride (95 %) were purchased from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Methylcellulose (1500 cP viscosity), Trolox (97 %), trans-resveratrol (99 %), (+)-catechin hydrate (98 %), and epicatechin (98 %) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), whilst 2,2-difenil-1-picrilhidrazil (98 %), trans-ε-viniferin (90 %), petunidin-3-O-glucoside (98 %), and procyanidin B1/B2/B3 (98 %) were acquired from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA). HPLC-grade solvents, including acetonitrile, water, ethanol, and methanol were purchased from Scharlau (Barcelona, Spain).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Collagen Scaffold Sterilization Analysis

2025
Samples from collagen scaffolds before and after sterilization with γ-irradiation (n = 3) were collected in reducing sample buffer (0.04% w/v bromophenol blue (Sigma-Aldrich), 1.0% w/v sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS, Sigma-Aldrich), 1.25% v/v β-mercaptoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 2.5% v/v glycerol (Thermo Scientific, and 31.25 mM TRIS (Sigma-Aldrich) in Milli-Q water (pH 6.8)). Purified type I collagen fibrils were prepared simultaneously as a control. The samples were heated at 70 °C for 10 min and loaded onto 8% polyacrylamide gels (Thermo Scientific) together with PageRuler Plus Prestained Protein Ladder (10–250 kDa, Thermo Scientific). Proteins were separated under reducing conditions and gels were washed briefly in demineralized water following completion of the run. Gels were heated in a microwave until boiling in 1% w/v Coomassie brilliant blue (MP Biomedicals, Eschwege, DE) dissolved in a staining solution of 10% glacial acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) and 50% methanol (Sigma-Aldrich) in demineralized water and left to stain for 15 min under constant agitation. The gels were washed twice for 20 min in the staining solution and then transferred to demineralized water for 30 min and photographed digitally.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «glacial acetic acid»

1

Biochemical Analysis of Biomolecular Samples

Acetic acid glacial (Sigma, cat. no. 537020)
Acetate, sodium salt (Sigma, cat. no. S5889)
Acetone (AC; Merck, cat. no. 01-6300117)
Adenosine 5′-monophosphate (AMP; Sigma, cat no. A1752)
Ammonium iron (II) sulfate hexahydrate (NH4)2Fe(SO4)2·6H2O; Sigma, cat. no. 215406)
Βutylated hydroxyanisol (BHA; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. B1253)
Bovine serum albumin (BSA; Sigma, cat. no. A9418)
Carboxymethyl cellulose sodium salt (CMCellu; Sigma cat. no. 21904)
Chloroform (CHCl3; Merck, cat. no. 1.02445)
Coommasie Briliant Blue G-250 (CBB G-250; Serva, cat. no. C.I. 42655)
Cytidine 5′-monophosphate (CMP; Sigma, cat. no. C1006)
Deoxycholic acid, sodium salt (DOC; Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. D6750)
2,4-Dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH; Sigma, cat. no. D198501)
DNA type III from salmon testes (Sigma, cat. no D1626)
Dithiothreitol, DL- (DTT; Sigma cat. no. D0632)
Ethanol, absolute (EtOH; Merck cat. no. 159010)
Ethyl acetate (EA; Sigma, cat no. 270989)
Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, disodium (EDTA; Merck, cat. no. 324503)
Glucose, monohydrate (Sigma, cat no. 49159)
Guanidine-HCl (gndHCl; Sigma, cat. no. G4505)
Guanosine 5′-monophosphate (GMP; Sigma, cat. no. G8377)
Hexane (Merck, cat. no. 104374)
H2SO4, concentrated (96% or 18.11 M; Sigma-EMD MILLIPORE, cat. no. 1.00714)
Hydrochloric acid (HCl, ≥ 37% w/w; Fluka, cat. no. 84415)
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2; 30% w/w, Merck, cat. no. 107209)
Hypochlorite, sodium salt (12–13% w/w or 1.67 M active chlorine; CL Chemicals, cat. no. CL02.1438)
Lysozyme from chicken egg white (Sigma, cat no. L6876)
Methanol (MetOH; 100%) for HPLC (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. 34860)
Pepsin from porcine gastric mucosa (Sigma, cat no. P6887)
Phenol (≥99.0%, Sigma cat. no. P4161)
Sodium borohydride (NaBH4; Sigma, cat. no. 213462)
Sodium chloride (NaCl; Sigma, cat. no. 433209)
Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS; Bio-Rad, cat. no. 1610302)
Sodium hydroxide (NaOH; Merck, cat. no. 567530)
Sodium (di-) phosphate (Νa2HPO4·2H2O; Merck, cat. no. 106580)
Sodium (tri-) phosphate dodecahydrate (Νa3PO4·12H2O; Merck, cat. no. 106578)
Streptomycin sulfate (SS; Sigma cat. no. S9137)
Thymidine 5′-monophosphate (TMP; Sigma, cat. no. T7004)
Trichloroacetic acid (TCA; Merck, cat. no. 1.00807.0250)
Tris-base (MP Biomedicals, cat. no. 02103133)
Urea (Sigma-Aldrich, cat. no. U1250)
All other reagents used were of the highest purity
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Oxylipin Quantification in EDTA-Plasma

Ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC)-grade acetonitrile, isopropanol, methanol, ethyl-acetate, and water were purchased from Biosolve (the Netherlands). Glacial acetic acid was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). High performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was performed with the Ascentis Express C18 (2.1 × 150 mm, 2.7 μm) column from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Solid phase extraction (SPE) was accomplished with Oasis HLB (60 mg/30 μm) cartridges from Waters (Milford, MA). Deuterated and non-deuterated oxylipin standards were purchased either from Cayman Chemicals (Ann Arbor, MI), Biomol (Plymouth Meeting, PA), or Larodan (Malmö, Sweden). Human EDTA-plasma for method validation was provided by Richmond Pharmacology Ltd. (London, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Neuroprotective Effects of Safranal Against Quinolinic Acid-Induced Oxidative Stress


ChemicalsSafranal and quinolinic acid (QA) were purchased from Fluka (St. Gallen, Switzerland) and Sigma (St. Louis, US), respectively. DTNB (2,2'-dinitro-5, 5'-dithiodibenzoic acid), tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ), TBA (2-thiobarbituric acid), Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Trizma base), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt (Na2EDTA), t-octylphenoxypoly-ethoxyethanol (Triton X-100), sodium lauroyl sarcosinate (sarkosyl), ethidium bromide, methanol, sodium acetate, glacial acetic acid, phosphoric acid, potassium chloride, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, chloral hydrate, and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Merck (Dramstadt, Germany). Low melting point (LMP) and normal melting point (NMP) agarose were purchased from Biogen (Mashhad, Iran) and Fermentase (Glen Burnie, US), respectively.
AnimalsAdult male Wistar rats weighting 250-300 g from the Central Animal House of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran), were used throughout the study. The animals were housed in the same room under a constant temperature (22±2 °C) and standard conditions of a 12h light/dark cycle with free access to food pellets and tap water, available ad libitum. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (87534), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and was performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Treatment scheduleThe animals were randomly divided into five different experimental groups of seven animals each. Group 1 (sham group) received single intraperitoneal (IP) injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus 1 µl of normal saline which was infused into the left hippocampus, 30 min later. Group 2 (QA group) received single IP injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus intrahippocampal (IH) administration of QA (300 nmol/1 μl/rat), 30 min later. Groups 3-5 (treatment groups) were injected by safranal (72.75, 145.5, and 291 mg/kg, IP), 30 min prior to QA administration (300 nmol/1 μl/rat, IH).
Intrahippocampal administration of QAThe animals were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, IP and then positioned in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting, US). After exposing the bregma suture, a small burr hole was made through the skull to permit access of microinjection needle into the left ventral hippocampus according to the brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (AP 3.7 mm, ML 2.4 mm, and DV 3.2 mm) (27 ). Using a 29-gauge stainless steel needle connected to a Hamilton syringe (Bonaduz, GR, Switzerland), one microliter saline solution containing 300 nmol QA (or vehicle alone as control) was unilaterally microinjected into the left ventral hippocampus region over a period of 1 min and left in situ for another 1 min to prevent back diffusion of the injected drug solution (28 (link), Figure 1). Following surgery, the animals were kept warm to recover from surgery and maintained in suitable situation for 24 hr. After that, the animals were decapitated, brains were quickly removed, kept in ice-cold saline, and the extracted hippocampi were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and maintained at -80°C until processing. The injection site was also verified using 1 µl methylene blue and anatomical observation.
The left hippocampus portion was gently homogenized in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to give a 10% homogeny suspension and used for biochemical and comet assay.
Ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assayThe basis of FRAP assay is reducing the colorless FeIII-TPTZ complex to blue colored FeII-TPTZ complex, by action of electron donating antioxidants in biological samples (29 (link)). The FRAP reagent consists of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH=3.6), 10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3.6H2O in the ratio of 10:1:1.
Briefly, 50 μl of homogenate was added to 1.5 ml freshly prepared and prewarmed (37ºC) FRAP reagent in a test tube and incubated at 37ºC for 10 min. The absorbance of the blue colored complex was read against reagent blank (1.5 ml FRAP reagent + 50 μl distilled water) at 593 nm. Standard solutions of FeII in the range of 100 to 1000 mM were prepared from ferrous sulphate (FeSO4.7H2O) in distilled water. FRAP values were expressed as nmol ferric ions reduced to ferrous form/mg tissue (29 (link)).
Total sulfhydryl (SH) groups measurementTotal thiol content was estimated based on the Ellman method (30 (link)). In this method, SH groups react with chromogenic DTNB and produce a yellow-colored dianion (5-thio-2- nitrobenzoic acid, TNB), which has peak absorbance at 412 nm.
Briefly, 1 ml Tris-EDTA buffer (0.1 M Tris, 10 mM EDTA, pH=8.6) was added to 50 µl homogenate sample in 2 ml cuvettes. Sample absorbance was read at 412 nm against Tris-EDTA buffer alone (A1), then 20 µl DTNB reagent (10 mM in methanol) was added to the mixture. Following 15 min incubation at room temperature, the sample absorbance was read again (A2). DTNB reagent absorbance was also read as a blank (B). Total thiol concentration was calculated by the following equation and expressed as nmol/mg tissue (22 (link)).
Total thiol concentration (mM) = (A2-A1-B) × (1.07/0.05) × 13.6
Thiobarbituric acid reactive species measurementHippocampal lipid peroxides formation was measured as malondialdehyde (MDA), which is the end product of lipid peroxidation and reacts with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) as a TBA reactive substance (TBARS) to produce a pink colored complex which has peak absorbance at 535 nm (31 ). In brief, 1 ml of homogenate sample was mixed with 2 ml of TCA-TBA-HCl reagent (15% TCA, 0.67% TBA, and 0.25N HCl) and heated for 45 min in a boiling water bath. After cooling, the mixture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and the absorbance was read against blank, at 535 nm. The amount of MDA produced was calculated, using a molar absorption coefficient of 1.56×105 M-1cm-1 and expressed as nmol/g tissue (32 (link)).
Alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assayThe in vivo alkaline SCGE (comet) assay was conducted based on the method described by Sasaki et al with some modifications (33 (link)). In brief, 10 µl of the hippocampus cells suspension, prepared as above, was mixed with 90 µl LMP agarose (0.5% in physiological saline), and the mixture was quickly layered over a microscope slide precoated with a layer of 100 µl NMP agarose (1% in physiological saline), the slides were then covered with a cover slip, and placed on ice to allow agarose to gel. Finally, another layer of LMP agarose was added on top. The slides were immersed immediately in a chilled lysing solution (pH 10) made up of 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Trizma, 1% sarkosyl, 10% DMSO, and 1% Triton X-100, and kept at 0C in the dark overnight. Then, the slides were placed on a horizontal gel electrophoresis platform and covered with a chilled alkaline solution made up of 300 mM NaOH and 1 mM Na2EDTA (pH>13). They were left in the solution in the dark at 0C for 40 min, and then electrophoresed at 0C in the dark for 30 min at 25 V and approximately 300 mA. The slides were rinsed gently three times with 400 mM Trizma solution (pH 7.5) to neutralize the excess alkali, stained with 50 µl of 20 mg/mL ethidium bromide, and covered with a cover slip.
One hundred nuclei per organ from each animal (50 nuclei on one slide) were examined and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Kyoto, Japan) at 400X magnification equipped with an excitation filter of 520-550 nm and a barrier filter of 580 nm. Undamaged cells resemble an intact nucleus without a tail, and damaged cells have the appearance of a comet. The percent of DNA in the comet tail (%tail DNA), which is an estimate of DNA damage, was measured using a computerized image analysis software (CASP software).
Statistical analysisThe statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.00 for Windows software (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA). Data were expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons between the study groups were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Evaluation of Adiantum capillus-veneris Extracts in Ulcerative Colitis


Chemicals and drugsPrednisolone and mesalazine powders were purchased from Iran Hormone Co. (Tehran, Iran). Ortho-dianisidine dihydrochloride (ODD) and hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide (HTAB) reagents were obtained from Sigma Company (St. Louis, USA). Formaldehyde, glacial acetic acid, ethanol (96%) and diethyl ether oxide were purchased from Merck Company (Darmstadt, Germany). Normal saline was purchased from Shahid Ghazi Co. (Tehran, Iran).
Plant preparationA. capillus-veneris was purchased from a local traditional market in Yazd, Iran and was identified by a botanist Dr. Iraj Mehregan from Islamic Azad University, Tehran Branch and a herbarium voucher (No. 2460) was deposited at Pharmacognosy Department of Isfahan School of Pharmacy. Aerial parts of the plant were dried in shade and finely powdered. Aqueous extract was prepared by maceration method using 4 l distilled water for 300 g plant powder, and the mixture was left for 24 hr; then, it was shaken for 2 hr, finally filtered and dried by a rotary evaporator. For preparation of hydroalcoholic extract, 300 g of plant powder was macerated by 3 l of EtOH/H2O (80/20) for 24 hr and then shaken for 2 hr, filtered and evaporated by a rotary evaporator. This semisolid extract was dried by a freeze drier for more complete drying (Evans, 2009 ▶ ).
AnimalsSixty male Wistar rats (180-220 g) were purchased from animal house of Isfahan School of Pharmacy, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran. All the animals were kept in the same and standard environmental situation. They were fed with pelleted rat chow and tap water, ad libitum. The study was approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in Iran (ethics approval code: IR.MUI.RESEARCH.REC.1397.154) and performed in accordance with National Institute of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Maximum efforts were made to decrease the number of animals used in the study and to lower the experimental distress.
Animal groupingTen groups of 6 rats (at least) were used in this study as follows:
1: Sham group (normal group): received Normal saline/tween orally (5 ml/kg, p.o.), as vehicle 2 hr before intra-rectal injection of Normal saline (2 ml/rat).
2: Control (colitis) group: received Normal saline/tween (5 ml/kg, p.o.) as vehicle, 2 hr before induction of colitis and continued for 4 days.
3, 4, and 5: Aqueous extract groups: received 3 increasing doses of ACAE (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg), 2 hr before induction of colitis and continued for 4 days (Kasabri et al. 2017).
6, 7, and 8: Hydroalcoholic extract groups: received 3 increasing doses of ACHE (150, 300, and 600 mg/kg) 2 hr before induction of colitis and continued for 4 days.
9. Prednisolone group (reference group): received prednisolone (4 mg/kg, p.o.), 2 hr before induction of colitis and continued for 4 days.
10: Mesalazine group (reference group): received mesalazine (100 mg/kg, p.o.), 2 hr before induction of colitis and continued for 4 days (Heidari, 2016)
All examined doses of plant extracts were dispersed in Normal saline containing tween 80 (0.1%), and administered p.o. in uniform volume (2 ml/rat).
Induction of ulcerative colitisFor induction of colitis, the rats were fasted for 24 hr while water was freely available. Then, under light ether anesthesia, 2 ml of acetic acid 3% was instilled within the colon via a flexible catheter (2 mm diameter and 8 cm length). The animals were maintained in head down position for one minute to prevent anal leakage (Minaiyan et al., 2011 ▶ (link)).
Preparation of colon tissue for macroscopic and microscopic studiesTwenty-four hours after giving the last dose of extracts, the rats were euthanized via over-dose of carbon dioxide inhalation. Distal colons (8 cm in length and 3 cm above the anus) were removed, cut longitudinally, and washed with Normal saline and their wet weight was immediately measured. Then, the tissue was fixed on a white working board and some suitable photos were taken by IPhone 8 camera for subsequent macroscopic evaluation. Ulcer severity (US) was evaluated through following scores: 0: No ulcer or erosion, 1: inflammation, edema, thickness and superficial erosions, 2: hemorrhage and evident erosion, and 3: severe ulceration, tissue necrosis and even perforation. Ulcer area (UA) was measured by Fiji P Win 32 program using photos of colons. Ulcer index (UI) was obtained through following equation: UI = UA (cm2) + US (1-3) (Minaiyan et al., 2014 ▶ ; Latifi et al., 2015 ▶ (link)).
After macroscopic evaluations, each colon specimen was cut into 2 equal pieces along its length. One piece was kept in formalin 10% for microscopic and histopathologic assessment while the other piece was kept in freezer (-70°C) for myeloperoxidase (MPO) and malondialdehyde (MDA) activity measurements (Minaiyan et al., 2009 ▶ ).
For microscopic studies, fixed colonic tissue specimens were paraffin-embedded, processed and sectioned in 4 millimeter (mm) thick layers. Then, they were deparaffinized by xylene and hydrated by ethanol. Finally, they were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Inflammation severity (0: none, 1: slight, 2: moderate, and 3: severe), inflammation extent (0: none, 1: mucosal, 2: mucosal and submucosal, and 3: transmural invasion), crypt damage (0: none, 1: basal 1/3 damaged, 2: basal 2/3 damaged, 3: surface epithelium was intact only, and 4: crypts and surface epithelium were intact) and leukocyte infiltration (0: trace, 1: mild, 2: moderated, and 3: sever) were assessed in H&E-stained encoded sections following modification of a validated scoring scheme described by Cooper et al. (1993) ▶ (link). Total colitis index (TCI) was measured by the following formula: TCI = Inflammation severity + inflammation extent + crypt damage + leukocyte infiltration. Histopathological evaluation was carried out using a Zeiss microscope equipped with a Sony color video camera (Sony, Japan) for digital imaging.
Evaluation of MPO activity For measuring the MPO activity of colonic tissue, 100 mg of each colon specimen was homogenized in 5 ml of potassium buffer (pH 6) containing 0.5% HTAB for three 45-sec cycles. The homogenates were sonicated for 10 sec in an ice bath, and then, they were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 15 min. 0.1 ml of supernatants was mixed with 2.9 ml of 50 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6) containing 0.167 mg/ml ODD and 0.0005% hydrogen peroxide. Finally, the absorbance (at 450 nm) was measured 0 and 3 minutes after that by a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (LSI Model Alfa-1502). MPO activity is reported as U/100 mg weight of wet colon tissue (Motavallian-Naeini et al., 2012 ▶ ).
Evaluation of MDA contentFor MDA activity measurement, 1 ml of potassium chloride 1.15% w/v was added to 100 mg of chopped colon tissue. The mixture was homogenized and then, centrifuged at 12000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was separated and used for measuring MDA value by an assay kit (Navand-Salamat, Iran) according to its provider’s instructions. MDA content is reported as nmol/ml of tissue sample.
Statistical analysisStatistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23. Parametric data is expressed as mean±SEM, and compared using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's LSD post hoc test. Non parametric data is expressed as median (range) using Mann-Whitney U-test for analysis. A p<0.05 was considered significant difference level for all analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Optimized STORM Imaging Buffers

Mercaptoethylamine (MEA – Sigma-Aldrich 30070) was prepared as a 1 M stock solution in deionized water, then adjusted to ∼pH 8 using glacial acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich), and stored at 4°C. β-mercaptoethanol (BME - Sigma-Aldrich M6250) was stored undiluted (14.3 M) at 4°C. Cyclooctatetraene (COT – Sigma-Aldrich 138924) and Trolox (Sigma-Aldrich 238813) were reconstituted in pure DMSO as 200 mM stock solutions. PCA (Protocatechuic acid, Sigma-Aldrich 37580) was dissolved to 100 mM in deionized water and adjusted to pH 9 using KOH and stored at 4°C; PCD (Protocatechuic dioxygenase, Sigma-Aldrich P8279) was stored at −20°C in 50% glycerol in 50 mM KCl, 1 mM EDTA and 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 8 at a concentration of 5 µM [24] (link). Propyl Gallate (Sigma-Aldrich P3130) was prepared as a stock solution of 16 mM in PBS. Pyranose Oxidase (Sigma-Aldrich P4234) was kept at −20°C, and weighed before being added to the buffer.
Imaging and associated photon-counting was performed in a solution containing 10% (w/v) glucose in 10 mM PBS-Tris pH 7.5 with 10 mM MEA combined with 50 mM BME, 2 mM COT, 2.5 mM PCA and 50 nM PCD. Glucose was removed for 3D imaging with the 60× objective (see Optical setup).
Photon-counting experiments were also performed using three other STORM imaging buffers: 10 mM Tris (pH 7.5), oxygen scavengers (0.2 mg/mL glucose oxidase (Sigma-Aldrich G0543-10KU), 57 µg/mL catalase (Sigma-Aldrich C3515) and either 100 mM MEA (‘MEA buffer’), 100 mM BME (‘BME buffer’), or 10 mM MEA combined with 50 mM BME (‘MEA+BME buffer’). Oxygen scavengers, thiols and COT solutions were diluted to the indicated concentrations approximately one hour prior to imaging, and the buffer was then adjusted to pH ∼8 with 1 M HEPES (Sigma-Aldrich H3662) before imaging (typical HEPES concentration in the buffer: ∼25 mM).
Imaging for Figure 4a–c was performed in a 25% 10 mM TRIS-PBS-75% Glycerol solution containing 10 mM MEA, 50 mM BME, 2 mM COT, 2.5 mM PCA and 50 nM PCD, with a measured index of refraction of 1.44 (see below).
Imaging for Figure S3 was performed in a 10 mM Tris-PBS pH 8+10% Glucose solution containing 10 mM MEA, 50 mM BME, 2 mM COT, 57 µg/mL catalase, and 5 U/mL Pyranose Oxidase.
All the different buffers used are summarized in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.