We Dissect Protocols

Phosphoric acid

Manufactured by Merck Group
1 514 citations
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, Italy, India, Spain, Australia, Canada, Brazil, France, China, Poland, Switzerland, Norway, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Indonesia, Sweden, Denmark, Belgium, Austria, Singapore, Ireland, Romania, Malaysia, Mexico, Egypt, Czechia, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Argentina
About the product

Phosphoric acid is a chemical compound with the formula H3PO4. It is a colorless, odorless, and viscous liquid that is commonly used in various industrial and laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Phosphoric acid is a commercial product available from the Merck Group and its authorized distributors. The pricing varies depending on the packaging and distributor. For example, a 2.5-liter bottle of phosphoric acid is priced at approximately €47.95 plus VAT through TURA Laboratuvar Çözümleri. Additionally, a 100 mL bottle of LiChropur™ Phosphoric Acid is available through Fisher Scientific.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

1 514 protocols using «phosphoric acid»

1

Nitric Oxide Production Assay

2025
The cells were treated with varying SME concentrations (12.5, 25, 50, 100, and 200 µg/mL) for 2 h, followed by stimulation with LPS (1 µg/mL) for 24 h. Following incubation, the cell culture supernatants were gathered and combined with Griess reagent, composed of 1% sulfanilamide (#S9251), 0.1% N-1-naphthylenediamine dihydrochloride (#N9125) (Sigma-Aldrich), and 2.5% phosphoric acid (#1.00573.1000, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), and then incubated at RT for 5 min. The absorbance of each sample was read at 540 nm using a Synergy HTX microplate reader (BioTek Instruments). NO production was quantified by comparing the absorbance values to a standard curve generated using a nitrite standard solution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Encapsulation and Immobilization of CalB Lipase

2025
C. antarctica lipase B (CalB) and nanofructosome-coated C. antarctica lipase B (CalB@NF, 33 kDa) were obtained from the Korea Research
Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology (Korea) and used in encapsulation
and immobilization. Oleic acid, poly(oxyethylene nonylphenylether)
(Igepal CO-520), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), ferric chloride
hexahydrate (FeCl3·6H2O), ferrous chloride
tetrahydrate (FeCl2·4H2O), bovine serum
albumin, tris base, phosphate buffer saline (PBS), Coomassie brilliant
blue G-250 (U.K), phosphoric acid, benzoic anhydride, and benzyl alcohol
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. 3-chloropropyltriethoxysilane (CPTES)
was purchased from Gelest. Cyclohexane, toluene, ammonia solution
(28:30%), ethanol (99%), methanol, glacial acetic acid, and n-hexane were purchased from Daejung (Korea).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Nitrite Determination Protocol

2025
0.2 g of N-(1-naphthyl) ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥98%), 4 g of p-aminobenzenesulfonamide (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥98%), and 10 ml of phosphoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥85 wt% in H2O) were dissolved into 50 ml of deionized water as the color reagent25 (link). Then, 2.5 ml of the diluted electrolyte were mixed with 0.05 ml of color reagent and stored ~30 min prior to the measurement. The absorbance at a wavelength of 540 nm was collected by UV-vis spectrometer to quantify the concentration of NO2 . KNO2 (Sigma-Aldrich, ≥96%) standard solutions with known concentration was used for the calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Rice Husk-Derived Porous Carbon Substrate

2025
Rice husk (RH) was collected as agricultural waste from commercial rice mill in Sharqea Governorate, Egypt. NaOH (Sigma-Aldrich, 97% purity), nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, 69% purity), and phosphoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, 85%) was applied during the activation steps and production of porous carbonaceous substrate. Pyrrole (98%, Sigma-Aldrich; Egypt), hydrochloric acid (≥37%, Sigma-Aldrich; Egypt), and potassium persulfate (99.99% Sigma-Aldrich) were employed in the preparation of polypyrrol hydrogel. Bisphenol-A (BPA> 99%; Sigma-Aldrich) and 4-chlorophenol (98%) were used as sources for the polluted solutions. These chemicals are all of analytical grade and are utilized without additional purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytotoxicity and Antibacterial Evaluation

2025
HaCat cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific,
Waltham, MA) were cultured inα-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal
bovine serum (FBS, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and antibiotics. Cell
viability was determined using a CellTiter96Aqueous One Solution Cell
Proliferation Assay (MTS, Promega, Poland). A lactate dehydrogenase
(LDH) assay was conducted using a Cytotoxicity Detection Kit (Roche,
Germany). The amount of nitric oxide (NO) was detected by using a
colorimetric Griess reaction. Sodium hydroxide (Alchem, Toru, Poland),
fluorescein diacetate (Sigma-Aldrich, Pozna, Poland), Tryptone Soya
Broth (TSB), (Pol-Aura, Poland) phosphoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO), and Plate Count Agar (PCA, Biomaxima, Lublin, Poland)
were used for antibacterial studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «phosphoric acid»

1

Collagen-Chondroitin Sulfate Scaffolds with Calcium Phosphate

CG scaffolds were fabricated from a suspension consisting of 0.5 w/w% type I collagen from bovine Achilles tendon (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 0.044 w/w% chondroitin sulfate from shark cartilage (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in 0.05 M acetic acid (Dagalakis et al., 1980 (link); O'Brien et al., 2005 (link); Yannas, 1992 (link); Yannas et al., 1980 (link), 1989 (link)). CGCaP suspensions included the same collagen and chondroitin sulfate components as well as calcium salts (Ca(OH)2, Ca(NO3)2•4H2O, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) in phosphoric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) (Lynn et al., 2010 (link)). A titrant-free concurrent mapping method was utilized to generate suspensions with expected 40 wt% and 80 wt% CaP content (Lynn et al., 2010 (link)). CG and CGCaP suspensions were degassed and stored at 4 °C prior to lyophilization.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

2

Drosophila Gut Microbiome Sampling Protocol

Drosophila melanogaster was reared at 25°C with a 12 h:12 h light–dark cycle on autoclaved yeast-glucose medium [Y-G diet, comprising Brewer’s yeast and glucose (both at 83 g l−1, from MP Biomedicals), agar (10 g l−1, from Frutarom) and preservatives (0.04% phosphoric acid, 0.42% propionic acid, from Sigma)], and transferred to fresh medium weekly. Outbred populations of strains Canton-S and Oregon-R had been maintained on Y-G diet for at least 18 years. Strain Ithaca-83 is an isofemale line established from a single female collected at Littletree Orchard, New-field, New York in 2004, and maintained on Y-G diet since collection.
The experimental samples comprised: guts (from proventriculus to rectum, excluding Malpighian tubules) dissected from third-instar larvae and adults; whole first- to second-(‘early’) instar larvae (< 48 h after hatching: these insects were too small for gut dissections); pupae (which lack a gut); and eggs (< 20 h after deposition). All samples except the eggs were surface-sterilized in 10% sodium hypochlorite solution, followed by three rinses in sterile distilled water. Gut dissections were conducted in sterile Ringer’s solution on clean glass slides with sterilized forceps, using a dissecting microscope at × 7 magnification. This sampling design followed preliminary experiments that confirmed the presence of bacteria in all surface-sterilized samples except eggs (data not shown), consistent with published evidence that bacteria are borne within larvae, pupae and adults, but not internal to the eggshell (Bakula, 1969 (link)). All experiments used reagent-only controls comprising a drop of Ringer’s solution treated as for dissections (including swirling the dissection instruments in the solution), but without D. melanogaster materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Cornell University

3

Neuroprotective Effects of Safranal Against Quinolinic Acid-Induced Oxidative Stress


ChemicalsSafranal and quinolinic acid (QA) were purchased from Fluka (St. Gallen, Switzerland) and Sigma (St. Louis, US), respectively. DTNB (2,2'-dinitro-5, 5'-dithiodibenzoic acid), tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ), TBA (2-thiobarbituric acid), Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Trizma base), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt (Na2EDTA), t-octylphenoxypoly-ethoxyethanol (Triton X-100), sodium lauroyl sarcosinate (sarkosyl), ethidium bromide, methanol, sodium acetate, glacial acetic acid, phosphoric acid, potassium chloride, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, chloral hydrate, and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Merck (Dramstadt, Germany). Low melting point (LMP) and normal melting point (NMP) agarose were purchased from Biogen (Mashhad, Iran) and Fermentase (Glen Burnie, US), respectively.
AnimalsAdult male Wistar rats weighting 250-300 g from the Central Animal House of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran), were used throughout the study. The animals were housed in the same room under a constant temperature (22±2 °C) and standard conditions of a 12h light/dark cycle with free access to food pellets and tap water, available ad libitum. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (87534), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and was performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Treatment scheduleThe animals were randomly divided into five different experimental groups of seven animals each. Group 1 (sham group) received single intraperitoneal (IP) injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus 1 µl of normal saline which was infused into the left hippocampus, 30 min later. Group 2 (QA group) received single IP injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus intrahippocampal (IH) administration of QA (300 nmol/1 μl/rat), 30 min later. Groups 3-5 (treatment groups) were injected by safranal (72.75, 145.5, and 291 mg/kg, IP), 30 min prior to QA administration (300 nmol/1 μl/rat, IH).
Intrahippocampal administration of QAThe animals were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, IP and then positioned in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting, US). After exposing the bregma suture, a small burr hole was made through the skull to permit access of microinjection needle into the left ventral hippocampus according to the brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (AP 3.7 mm, ML 2.4 mm, and DV 3.2 mm) (27 ). Using a 29-gauge stainless steel needle connected to a Hamilton syringe (Bonaduz, GR, Switzerland), one microliter saline solution containing 300 nmol QA (or vehicle alone as control) was unilaterally microinjected into the left ventral hippocampus region over a period of 1 min and left in situ for another 1 min to prevent back diffusion of the injected drug solution (28 (link), Figure 1). Following surgery, the animals were kept warm to recover from surgery and maintained in suitable situation for 24 hr. After that, the animals were decapitated, brains were quickly removed, kept in ice-cold saline, and the extracted hippocampi were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and maintained at -80°C until processing. The injection site was also verified using 1 µl methylene blue and anatomical observation.
The left hippocampus portion was gently homogenized in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to give a 10% homogeny suspension and used for biochemical and comet assay.
Ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assayThe basis of FRAP assay is reducing the colorless FeIII-TPTZ complex to blue colored FeII-TPTZ complex, by action of electron donating antioxidants in biological samples (29 (link)). The FRAP reagent consists of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH=3.6), 10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3.6H2O in the ratio of 10:1:1.
Briefly, 50 μl of homogenate was added to 1.5 ml freshly prepared and prewarmed (37ºC) FRAP reagent in a test tube and incubated at 37ºC for 10 min. The absorbance of the blue colored complex was read against reagent blank (1.5 ml FRAP reagent + 50 μl distilled water) at 593 nm. Standard solutions of FeII in the range of 100 to 1000 mM were prepared from ferrous sulphate (FeSO4.7H2O) in distilled water. FRAP values were expressed as nmol ferric ions reduced to ferrous form/mg tissue (29 (link)).
Total sulfhydryl (SH) groups measurementTotal thiol content was estimated based on the Ellman method (30 (link)). In this method, SH groups react with chromogenic DTNB and produce a yellow-colored dianion (5-thio-2- nitrobenzoic acid, TNB), which has peak absorbance at 412 nm.
Briefly, 1 ml Tris-EDTA buffer (0.1 M Tris, 10 mM EDTA, pH=8.6) was added to 50 µl homogenate sample in 2 ml cuvettes. Sample absorbance was read at 412 nm against Tris-EDTA buffer alone (A1), then 20 µl DTNB reagent (10 mM in methanol) was added to the mixture. Following 15 min incubation at room temperature, the sample absorbance was read again (A2). DTNB reagent absorbance was also read as a blank (B). Total thiol concentration was calculated by the following equation and expressed as nmol/mg tissue (22 (link)).
Total thiol concentration (mM) = (A2-A1-B) × (1.07/0.05) × 13.6
Thiobarbituric acid reactive species measurementHippocampal lipid peroxides formation was measured as malondialdehyde (MDA), which is the end product of lipid peroxidation and reacts with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) as a TBA reactive substance (TBARS) to produce a pink colored complex which has peak absorbance at 535 nm (31 ). In brief, 1 ml of homogenate sample was mixed with 2 ml of TCA-TBA-HCl reagent (15% TCA, 0.67% TBA, and 0.25N HCl) and heated for 45 min in a boiling water bath. After cooling, the mixture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and the absorbance was read against blank, at 535 nm. The amount of MDA produced was calculated, using a molar absorption coefficient of 1.56×105 M-1cm-1 and expressed as nmol/g tissue (32 (link)).
Alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assayThe in vivo alkaline SCGE (comet) assay was conducted based on the method described by Sasaki et al with some modifications (33 (link)). In brief, 10 µl of the hippocampus cells suspension, prepared as above, was mixed with 90 µl LMP agarose (0.5% in physiological saline), and the mixture was quickly layered over a microscope slide precoated with a layer of 100 µl NMP agarose (1% in physiological saline), the slides were then covered with a cover slip, and placed on ice to allow agarose to gel. Finally, another layer of LMP agarose was added on top. The slides were immersed immediately in a chilled lysing solution (pH 10) made up of 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Trizma, 1% sarkosyl, 10% DMSO, and 1% Triton X-100, and kept at 0C in the dark overnight. Then, the slides were placed on a horizontal gel electrophoresis platform and covered with a chilled alkaline solution made up of 300 mM NaOH and 1 mM Na2EDTA (pH>13). They were left in the solution in the dark at 0C for 40 min, and then electrophoresed at 0C in the dark for 30 min at 25 V and approximately 300 mA. The slides were rinsed gently three times with 400 mM Trizma solution (pH 7.5) to neutralize the excess alkali, stained with 50 µl of 20 mg/mL ethidium bromide, and covered with a cover slip.
One hundred nuclei per organ from each animal (50 nuclei on one slide) were examined and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Kyoto, Japan) at 400X magnification equipped with an excitation filter of 520-550 nm and a barrier filter of 580 nm. Undamaged cells resemble an intact nucleus without a tail, and damaged cells have the appearance of a comet. The percent of DNA in the comet tail (%tail DNA), which is an estimate of DNA damage, was measured using a computerized image analysis software (CASP software).
Statistical analysisThe statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.00 for Windows software (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA). Data were expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons between the study groups were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

4

Fabrication and Characterization of PLGA Nanoparticles

For the preparation of the PLGA NPs, PLGA 5004 A (50:50, molecular weight (MW) ≈ 44 kDa), was generously offered by Corbion-Purac Biomaterials (Netherlands). Ethyl acetate (EA), Kolliphor® P 407 and fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). The cherry extracts were obtained from a Tuscan cherry variety of Prunus avium L. (sweet cherry), Crognola Capannile, as already described [10 (link)]. The total polyphenol content (TPC) of CE samples, expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE), was 26.7 µg/mL GAE per mg of dry weight, while the total antioxidant potential of CE, determined using the ferric-reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, was 0.229 mg of Fe2+/mL. The following polymer derivatives were prepared according to the methods described in the references cited: reduced-MW hyaluronic acid rHA, viscosimetric MW 470 kDa, from HA MW 950 kDa (Contipro, Dolní Dobrouč, Czech Republic) [32 (link)]; quaternary ammonium chitosan (QA-Ch) conjugates synthesized at 60 °C, from low-molecular-weight Ch (Sigma) [33 (link)]; thiolated derivative of QA-Ch [34 (link)] and its derivative with protected thiols, coded QA-Ch-S-pro [24 (link)]. The following chemicals for the HPLC analysis were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich: phosphoric acid 85% w/v, methanol, and (+)-catechin hydrate >98% pure as a standard. The following reagents for cells culture were purchased from Sigma: M199 medium, fetal bovine serum (FBS), heparin sodium, gelatin solution 2%, endothelial cell growth supplement (ECGS), 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with 4.5 g/L glucose from Lonza, Hank’s balanced salt solution (HBSS 1× without phenol red), penicillin–streptomycin mixture (Pen-Strep) from Gibco (Waltham, MA, USA), and Triton X-100 from Spi-Chem (Atlanta, GA, USA) were also used for in vitro studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Siena, University of Pisa, i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde, Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Cooperativa de Ensino Superior Politécnico e Universitário

5

Drosophila Microbiome Isolation and Characterization

Drosophila melanogaster Canton S (Wolbachia-free) were reared at 25°C, 12 h:12 h light-dark cycle, on yeast-glucose diet: 100 g l−1 Brewer's yeast (inactive; MP Biomedicals), 100 g l−1 glucose (Sigma), 12 g l−1 agar (Apex) and preservatives [0.04% phosphoric acid, 0.42% propionic acid (Sigma)]. Drosophila gut microbiota members were isolated on modified MRS agar from aseptically-dissected fly guts. All bacteria used in the study are listed in Table 1, and were maintained at 30°C. Modified MRS contains (all from Sigma unless noted): 1.25% vegetable peptone (Becton Dickinson), 0.75% yeast extract, 2% glucose, 0.5% sodium acetate, 0.2% dipotassium hydrogen phosphate, 0.2% triammonium citrate, 0.02% magnesium sulfate heptahydrate, 0.005% manganese sulfate tetrahydrate, 1.2% agar (Apex). Potato medium contains: 0.5% glucose, 1% yeast extract, 1% peptone, 0.8% potato extract (Fluka 07915), 1.2% agar (Apex). Bacteria we isolated from Drosophila guts are identified as F for “fly isolate” and those isolated from other sources as NF for “non-fly,” e.g., Acetobacter tropicalisF vs. A. tropicalisNF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Cornell University, Mansfield University

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.