We Dissect Protocols

Hydrochloric acid (hcl)

Manufactured by Merck Group
8 913 citations
Sourced in Germany, United States, United Kingdom, India, Italy, France, Spain, Australia, China, Switzerland, Canada, Poland, Ireland, Japan, Singapore, Brazil, Sao Tome and Principe, Hungary, Belgium, Malaysia, Macao, Mexico, Sweden, Chile, Senegal, Indonesia, Austria, Portugal, Denmark, Israel, Netherlands, Egypt, Romania, Czechia, New Zealand, Greece, Finland, Saudi Arabia, Kenya, Norway, Panama, South Africa, Argentina, Antigua and Barbuda, Gabon, Bulgaria, Thailand, Hong Kong
About the product

Hydrochloric acid is a commonly used laboratory reagent. It is a clear, colorless, and highly corrosive liquid with a pungent odor. Hydrochloric acid is an aqueous solution of hydrogen chloride gas.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is actively commercialized by Merck Group under various product lines, including EMSURE®, Suprapur®, and Titripur®. These products are available through authorized distributors such as VWR and MilliporeSigma.

Pricing for hydrochloric acid varies based on concentration, purity, and packaging. For example, a 1-liter bottle of 0.1 M hydrochloric acid solution is listed at around $30, and a 1-liter bottle of 37% hydrochloric acid is priced at approximately £21.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

8 913 protocols using «hydrochloric acid (hcl)»

1

Leaching of Spent Auto Catalysts

2025
Two different SAC samples were used to study the PGMs leaching. The first sample was the spent car catalyst European reference material (CRM or ERM®‐EB504a, BAM Germany) with values of 1414±9 mg kg−1 Pt, 1596±11 mg kg−1 Pd and 210±2 mg kg−1 Rh. This CRM was used to validate the methods and compare the results with those of the other sample (industrial sample) which was a crushed powder form of spent ceramic monoliths. It was provided by Hensel Recycling Australia PTY LTD (Melbourne, VIC) together with information of its PGM composition obtained by X‐ray fluorescence, i. e., 221 mg kg−1 Pt, 2507 mg kg−1 Pd and 508 mg kg−1 Rh.
Concentrated HCl (36 %, Thermo Fisher), HNO3 (70 %, Thermo Fisher), H2SO4 (98 %, Chem‐supply), H2O2 (30 % w/w, Chem‐supply), NaClO (8–12.5 %, Chem‐supply), C6H8O7.H2O (99 %, Chem‐supply) and NaClO3 (99 %, Sigma‐Aldrich) were used in the preparation of six leachates with the following compositions: 75 % HCl‐25 % HNO3; 99.2 % HCl‐0.8 % H2O2; 90 % HCl‐0.5 % H2O2–0.5 % H2SO4; 79 % HCl‐21 % NaClO3; 97 % HCl‐3 % NaClO; and 95 % HCl‐3 % NaClO‐2 % H2O2. The concentrations in all the leaching solutions are expressed in %(v/v). Deionized water (Merck Millipore, 18.2 MΩcm) was used for the preparation of all standard solutions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antioxidant Capacity Assay and Computational Modeling

2025
(+)-Catechin hydrate, L-Ascorbic Acid, Iron (III) Chloride hexahydrate, 2,4,6- Tris(2 pyridyl)-s-triazine, (±)6-Hydroxy-2,5,7,8 tetramethylchroman-2-Carboxylic Acid, sodium acetate·3H20, ethanol, methanol, and hydrochloric acid were all purchased from Sigma Aldrich Co (St. Louis, MO). All clinical serum samples (S1 File: S1 and S2 Tables) with no identifying information were purchased from Discovery Life Sciences, Inc. (Los Osos, CA).
For the experimental assays, aqueous antioxidant solutions were prepared as controls in a 1:4 ratio of water and 40 μM antioxidant in 10% ethanol using a microscale approach of the established protocol of Benzie and Strain. For example, 60 μL water and 180 μL of 40 μM catechin or L-Ascorbic Acid in 10% ethanol were combined. Serum samples were prepared in a similar fashion with a 1:4 ratio of serum (in lieu of water) and 10% ethanol. Briefly, these samples contain 60 μL serum (normal triglyceride values: 57–144 mg/dL, n = 11 and severe hypertriglyceridemia: 827–1096 mg/dL, n = 13) and 180 μL of 10% ethanol. Serum samples were also combined with antioxidant and prepared at the same ratio of 1:4 for the serum and antioxidant in 10% ethanol. These samples include 60 μL serum and 180 μL of 40 μM catechin or L-Ascorbic Acid in 10% ethanol. A solution of 180 μL of 10% ethanol and 60 μL water was prepared as the reagent blank. Trolox, a standard vitamin E analog used in FRAP assays, was prepared for calibration at increasing concentrations from 50 μM to 2.5 mM. In short, 60 μL of trolox and 180 μL of 80% methanol were combined as established previously. All the above solutions were incubated at 37 ºC for 1 hour following preparation. A FRAP reaction reagent was prepared with 10 mL of 20 mM FeCl3*6H2O, 10 mL of 10 mM TPTZ, and 50 mL sodium acetate buffer (pH = 3.6). After the one-hour incubation at 37ºC, the FRAP reagent (1800 μL) was added to all solutions for a 5-minute incubation at 37ºC. We measured the absorbance of all solutions in triplicate at 593 nm at various times following the assay on Biotek’s EPOCH microplate spectrophotometer. The final measurement was taken at 180 minutes when the increase in antioxidant activity became stable for catechin and ascorbic acid. A LINEST calibration (b = 0) was performed for each assay, and activities of all controls and samples are described in Trolox equivalents.
In conjunction with experimental assays, computational modeling calculations were performed with Gaussian 16 software. All geometry optimizations were carried out at the m06 [24 (link)] density functional level of theory employing the triple ζ basis set 6–311++G(d,p) [25 (link), 26 (link)] augmented with diffuse [27 (link)] and polarization [28 ] functions. Vibrational frequencies were computed at the same level of theory to confirm that the optimized geometries are minima and to obtain enthalpy and free energy values. All geometries were also optimized, and frequencies were calculated with solvent effects for water and benzene employing the self-consistent reaction field polarizable conductor model SCRF-CPCM [29 (link), 30 (link)].
Stabilization energies are calculated using free energy difference, ΔG, of the products compared to the reactant in hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reaction represented in Eq 1. Bond dissociation energy (BDE) values were calculated as the enthalpy difference at 298 K for the reaction in Eq 2. The gas phase served as the control. The OH groups numbered on the antioxidant structures illustrated in Fig 1 are assessed individually and then in combination using the HAT mechanism for the two calculations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Extraction and Quantification of Bioactive Compounds in Food Matrices

2025
All reagents and chemicals were of the analytical grade, GA (LogP 0.72), ChA (LogP − 0.27), 4-OH-BA (LogP 1.33), CA (LogP 1.53), CiA (LogP 2.14), and Aliquat®336 were obtained from Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany). Pepsin, acetic acid, hydrochloric acid, sodium chloride, and sodium hydroxide were also purchased from Merck KGaA. 1-Octanol, methanol, 1-hexanol, 1-heptanol, 1-pentanol, thymol, and 6-methyl coumarin were obtained from Fisher Scientific (Madrid, Spain). A deep eutectic solvent (DES) was prepared by mixing thymol and 6-methyl coumarin in a 2:1 molar ratio [31 (link)]. Daily working standard solutions were prepared by diluting stock solutions (6000 mg/L) of target analytes in methanol with highly pure deionized water obtained from a Milli-Q system (18.2 MΩ·cm, Millipore, Molsheim, France). It is important to mention that certain PPAs, such as CiA, possess very low solubility in water. Hence, a constant concentration of 7.5% (v/v) methanol was maintained in all working standards and real samples to ensure data reliability across all experiments.
To prevent salt-dependent µEME results, the conductivities of the standards were adjusted with 2 mol/L NaCl to match that of the gastric fluid (adjusted at pH 7.0 before analysis) at room temperature (25 °C). Conductometric measurements were performed using a COND 7 + conductometer equipped with the COND Cell model 2301 T (XS Instruments, Carpi, Italy). A calibration curve ranging from 0 to 200 mmol/L NaCl solutions was obtained with the equation and the determination coefficient (R2) of conductivity (µS/cm) = 71.7 [NaCl, mmol/L] + 151.2 and 0.9986, respectively. The conductivity of the pH 7.0 adjusted gastric fluid with NaOH prior to µEME was determined to be 8360 µS/cm at 25 °C, which was equivalent to that of 114.5 mmol/L NaCl. Therefore, 120 mmol/L NaCl was added to all standards as a matrix-matched modifier in preliminary investigations of experimental SIA-µEME parameters.
The physiologically based extraction medium to simulate the human gastric fluid was adapted from the United States Pharmacopeia (USP) specifications [32 ] by dissolving a metered amount of Pepsin (3.2 g) with an activity of 0.7 USP unit/mg in 0.7 mL concentrated HCl before making up to 1 L (final pH of ca. 1.4). This solution was transferred to a 2-L beaker and paddle-stirred with a speed of 500 rpm for 2 h at 37 °C. The real samples consisted of either 1 capsule of green coffee extract or 100 g of blueberry or eggplant purchased from the local market (Palma, Spain) and were subjected to the physiologically relevant extraction test using 1000 mL of the USP gastric fluid. Following gastric digestion, the pH of the samples was adjusted to 7.0 using a saturated NaOH solution. Samples were then filtered through polyvinylidene fluoride syringe filters (0.45 µm), prior to the D-µEME-HPLC-UV-Vis analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ash-Based Adsorbent for Rare Earth Elements

2025
The fly ash (FA) used in this study was obtained from the coal combustion (Thermal power plant Nikola Tesla B, Obrenovac, Serbia), while wood ash (20%) was obtained from a burning process in individual fireplaces. The chemicals used for material modification and adsorption experiments were sodium hydroxide (pellets, ≥97%, CAS No: 1310-73-2), sodium silicate (>99%, CAS No: 1344-09-8), sodium chloride (≥99.5%, CAS No: 7647-14-5), and hydrochloric acid (37%, CAS No: 7647-01-0), and were supplied by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
The stock solutions (1.00 g L−1) of the elements for the adsorption test were prepared from the salts Y3+ (Y(NO)·6HO, 99.8%, CAS No: 13494-98-9), Sc3+ (solution of Sc(NO)·HO, 99.9%, CAS No: 107552-14-7), and Gd3+ (solution of Gd(NO)·6HO, 99.99%, CAS No: 19598-90-4), also purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Metabolite Analysis via UPLC-MS/MS

2025
Quantitative determination of small molecule functional metabolites was performed using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–MS/MS) (ACQUITY UPLC-Xevo TQ-S, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA). Samples were separated by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) and analyzed by ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 μM VanGuard pre-column (2.1 × 5 mm) and ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 1.7 μM analytical column (2.1 × 100 mm) columns. All standards were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA), Steraloids Inc. (Newport, RI, USA) and TRC Chemicals (Toronto, ON, Canada). The standard substances were weighed accurately, dissolved in water, methanol, sodium hydroxide solution (Sigma-Aldrich, 795429) or hydrochloric acid solution (Sigma-Aldrich, 258148), and prepared as a concentration of 5.0 mg/mL stock solutions, respectively. A calibration solution was prepared and mixed with an appropriate amount of each standard sample.
Formic acid (Mass Pure Grade, A117-50) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St.Louis, MO, USA), methanol (Mass Pure Grade, A-456-4), acetonitrile (Mass Pure Grade, A955-4) and isopropanol (Mass Pure Grade, A461-4) were purchased from Thermo-Fisher Scientific (FairLawn, NJ, USA). Experimental ultrapure water was prepared for LC/MS from a Mill-Q reference ultrapure water system (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with a 0.22 μm filter.
To avoid degradation of samples, they were thawed in an ice bath and 20 μL of blood samples were added to the 96-well plate, and then the plate was transferred to an Eppendorf epMotion workstation (Eppendorf Inc., Humburg, Germany). 120 μl of ice-water pre-cooled methanol solution (containing internal standard) was added and vortexed vigorously for 5 min. The plates were centrifuged (4000g, 30 min) at 4 °C, and returned to the workstation. 20 μL of freshly prepared derivatization reagent was added to each well, the plate was sealed and placed at 30 °C for 60 min of derivatization. Furthermore, 330 μL ice-bathed 50% methanol solution was added to dilute the sample, and centrifuged at 4 °C (4000g, 30 min), 135 μL supernatant was drawn and transferred to a new 96-well plate, which of 10μL was added each as internal standard. Add the derivatized standard stock solution to the left well for serial dilution, and finally seal the plate for LC–MS analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Top 5 most cited protocols using «hydrochloric acid (hcl)»

1

Single Particle Analysis of Nanoparticles by ICP-MS

A quadrapole ICP-MS with a Micromist nebulizer and a Scott Double Pass spray chamber (Agilent 7500 CE, Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) was used for single particle analysis of the nanoparticle samples. The data acquisition for the instrument was set to time-resolved analysis (TRA) mode, thus collecting intensities as a function of time (i.e. counts/dwell-time interval). The measurement duration of each run was 30 s with a data acquisition rate, or dwell time, of 10 ms/event. At the beginning of each run the instrument was tuned using a multi-element tune solution for optimal sensitivity and minimum oxide and double-charged species levels (Table S-1, Supporting Information). The tune solution was made in-house using 1 µg/L Li, Co. Y, Tl, Ce, and Ba in 1% v/v hydrochloric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). A calibration curve was produced using dissolved standards (AccuTrace, CT, USA) prepared in 0.2% trace pure nitric acid (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). The peristaltic pump was set to 0.05 rps for all experiments, which translates to a sample flow rate of approximately 0.18 mL/min. However, given the potential for slight day to day differences, the flow rate was measured during each experiment. Due to the rapid data sampling rate, only one isotope (107Ag for silver and 197Au for gold) was monitored during analysis. Data, in the form of counts per dwell-time interval as a function of time, were exported to a spreadsheet for further processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : CSIRO Land and Water, Colorado School of Mines, National Measurement Institute

2

Multiplex Protein and DNA Detection

Optical fiber bundles were purchased from Schott North America (Southbridge, MA). Non-reinforced gloss silicone sheeting was obtained from Specialty Manufacturing (Saginaw, MI). Hydrochloric acid, anhydrous ethanol, and molecular biology grade Tween-20 were all from Sigma-Aldrich (Saint Louis, MO). 2.7-μm-diam. carboxyl-terminated magnetic beads were purchased from Varian, Inc. (Lake Forest, CA). Monoclonal anti-human TNF-α capture antibody, polyclonal anti-human TNF-α detection antibody, and recombinant human TNF-α were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Monoclonal anti-PSA capture antibody, monoclonal anti-PSA detection antibody, and purified PSA were purchased from BiosPacific (Emeryville, CA); the detection antibody was biotinylated using standard methods. 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysulfosuccinimide (NHS), and SuperBlock® T-20 Blocking Buffer were purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, IL). Purified DNA was purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, IA). Streptavidin-β-galactosidase (SβG) was conjugated in house using standard protocols. Resorufin-β-D-galactopyranoside (RGP) was purchased from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA). The fiber polisher and polishing consumables were purchased from Allied High Tech Products (Rancho Dominguez, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Quanterix (United States), Tufts University

3

Fabrication and Characterization of Collagen Scaffolds

Scaffold Fabrication: Insoluble fibrillar type I collagen from bovine Achilles tendon (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) was hydrated overnight at 1% (w/v) in either 0.05 m acetic acid (Alfa-Aesar, UK) or 0.001 m hydrochloric acid (Sigma-Aldrich). After homogenization and centrifugation for air bubble removal, the resulting collagen suspension was poured into stainless steel molds, filling height < 1 cm. The molds were placed into a VirTis AdVantage benchtop freeze-drier (Biopharma Process Systems, UK), which was either precooled to −35 °C or ramped to −35 °C from room temperature at 1.2 °C min−1. An additional scaffold was created in a silicone mold, filling height 2 cm, by quenching the acetic acid suspension to −20 °C. After complete freezing, a pressure of 80 mTorr and a temperature of 0 °C were maintained for ice sublimation. The resulting scaffolds were chemically cross-linked using 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC, Sigma-Aldrich) and N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS, Sigma-Aldrich), with 95% ethanol as solvent. EDC and NHS were used in the molar ratio 5:2:1 relative to the collagen carboxylic acid groups (EDC:NHS:COOH). Scaffolds were immersed in the cross-linking solution for two hours, before thorough washing with distilled water (5 × 5 min), and drying using the same freeze-drying cycle as before.
Scaffold Image Acquisition and Pore Size Measurement: For qualitative SEM analysis, scaffolds were sectioned in the plane containing the freezing direction (the xz plane) using a scalpel, and sputter-coated with gold/platinum. A JEOL JSM-820 SEM was used for image acquisition, in secondary electron mode at 10 kV. For quantitative Micro-CT analysis a Skyscan 1072 system (Bruker, BE) was used to image scaffold samples cut with a 5 mm biopsy punch. Projection images were taken at 25 kV and 138 μA, with 0.23° rotation steps and 7.5 s image acquisition time, averaged over four frames. Magnification was set at 75x, pixel size 3.74 μm. Projections were processed into 3D datasets using the Skyscan reconstruction software NRecon, before binarization using the Trainable Segmentation plugin within the ImageJ software distribution FIJI. Image noise was reduced using individual z-slice despeckle, followed by a 2 × 2 × 2 median filter in 3D. Z-slices were sampled from the dataset at 50 μm spacing and mean pore size over 20 slices was calculated using FIJI: after removal of outliers larger than 2 pixels, a watershed algorithm was applied to the dataset, to allow ellipse fit to each pore. Pore size refers to the mean diameter of the circle of equivalent area to these best-fit ellipses.
Percolation Calculations: The median-filtered scaffold dataset was imported into the Skyscan analysis software CTAn. A cubic region of interest (ROI) was defined such that only one face of the cube, an xy face, was accessible to invasion. Face dimensions were set at 1 mm × 1 mm (for visualization as in Figure 2) or at 2 mm × 2 mm (for numerical analysis). The CTAn function “ROI Shrinkwrap” was then used to identify the volume accessible to a virtual object. The diameter of this object, d, was controlled, and the corresponding length of the accessible pore volume in the z-direction, L, was measured. These measurements were then plotted according to the following relationship from percolation theory:[15 (link)]

where v is a percolation constant with value 0.88 for 3D systems.[26 (link)] Values of d were plotted as a function of to allow calculation of the intercept: the percolation diameter, dc.
Cell Culture: Human periodontal ligament fibroblasts (Lonza, CH) were cultured in high glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (LifeTechnologies, CH) with 5% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Trypsin-EDTA was used to detach the subconfluent fibroblasts, which were seeded at passage five. Scaffold samples approximately 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm were sterilized in 70% ethanol, before washing twice in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, LifeTechnologies) and subsequent prewetting in medium. Excess medium was aspirated from the scaffolds before seeding in triplicate onto the 10 mm × 10 mm face, at a concentration of 64 000 cells in 50 μL medium per scaffold. Extra medium was added after one hour at room temperature. Culture conditions were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for three days, with one medium change. At day three, medium was removed and the scaffolds were washed in PBS, before fixing with 10% formalin (Sigma-Aldrich).
Staining and Microscopy: Once washed in PBS, scaffolds were immersed in 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min and then washed in PBS before cytoskeletal actin staining with Alexa Fluor 488 Phalloidin (MolecularProbes, CH) at 2.5 μL/200 μL in 1% bovine serum albumin/PBS (BSA, Sigma-Aldrich). Scaffolds were then embedded in 15% gelatin/PBS (BioGel, CH), and the solidified gelatin blocks were fixed with 10% formalin. A Leica VT1000 S Vibratome was used to section these blocks at a thickness of 200 μm, to reveal the scaffold cross-section. A Yokogawa CV1000 Cell Voyager confocal microscope was used to record the maximum fluorescent intensity over 11 z-slices, spacing 20 μm, for each scaffold cross-section. For each scaffold condition, two biological replicates were chosen for analysis, deliberately selected such that local collagen wall orientation was kept constant between scaffold conditions. Three sections were taken from each of these replicates, giving a total of six images for study per scaffold condition. Fluorescent intensity profiles were averaged over a width of 4 mm (300 pixels) and background intensity values (measured from an empty area of the image) were subtracted. Measured intensity values I were normalized to the total summed intensity over the profile, ∑I, and the median cell position was calculated by finding the distance at which the cumulative intensity equaled half the total summed intensity.
Statistics: For pore size and percolation diameter, the mean of three measurements was calculated, along with standard error of the mean. For median cell position, the mean and standard error of six measurements was calculated. Statistical significance was tested using one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell analysis was used for pairwise comparisons (significance level p < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Cambridge, Geistlich Pharma (Switzerland)

4

Comprehensive Phytochemical and Antioxidant Analysis

In this study, most of the chemicals, reagents, and standards were analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia). Gallic acid, L-ascorbic acid, vanillin, hexahydrate aluminium chloride, Folin-Ciocalteu’s phenol reagent, sodium phosphate, iron(III) chloride hexahydrate (Fe[III]Cl3.6H2O), hydrated sodium acetate, hydrochloric acid, sodium carbonate anhydrous, ammonium molybdate, quercetin, catechin, 2,2′-diphenyl-1-picrylhy-drazyl (DPPH), 2,4,6tripyridyl-s-triazine (TPTZ), and 2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS) were purchased from the Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) for the estimation of polyphenols and antioxidant potential. Sulfuric acid (H2SO4) with 98% purity was purchased from RCI Labscan (Rongmuang, Thailand). HPLC standards including Gallic acid, p-hydroxybenzoic acid, caftaric acid, caffeic acid, protocatechuic acid, sinapinic acid, chlorogenic acid, syringic acid, ferulic acid, coumaric acid, catechin, quercetin, quercetin-3-galactoside, diosmin, quercetin-3-glucuronide, epicatechin gallate, quercetin-3-glucoside, kaempferol and kaempferol-3-glucoside were produced by Sigma-Aldrich (Castle Hill, NSW, Australia) for quantification proposes. HPLC and LC-MS grade reagents including methanol, ethanol, acetonitrile, formic acid, and glacial acetic acid were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (Scoresby, VIC, Australia). To perform various in vitro bioactivities and antioxidant assays, 96 well-plates were bought from the Thermo Fisher Scientific (VIC, Australia). Additionally, HPLC vials (1 mL) were procured from the Agilent technologies (VIC, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : University of Melbourne, Agriculture and Food, Deakin University, University of Leeds

5

Neuroprotective Effects of Safranal Against Quinolinic Acid-Induced Oxidative Stress


ChemicalsSafranal and quinolinic acid (QA) were purchased from Fluka (St. Gallen, Switzerland) and Sigma (St. Louis, US), respectively. DTNB (2,2'-dinitro-5, 5'-dithiodibenzoic acid), tripyridyltriazine (TPTZ), TBA (2-thiobarbituric acid), Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane (Trizma base), ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt (Na2EDTA), t-octylphenoxypoly-ethoxyethanol (Triton X-100), sodium lauroyl sarcosinate (sarkosyl), ethidium bromide, methanol, sodium acetate, glacial acetic acid, phosphoric acid, potassium chloride, ferric chloride, ferrous sulfate, chloral hydrate, and hydrochloric acid were obtained from Merck (Dramstadt, Germany). Low melting point (LMP) and normal melting point (NMP) agarose were purchased from Biogen (Mashhad, Iran) and Fermentase (Glen Burnie, US), respectively.
AnimalsAdult male Wistar rats weighting 250-300 g from the Central Animal House of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (Mashhad, Iran), were used throughout the study. The animals were housed in the same room under a constant temperature (22±2 °C) and standard conditions of a 12h light/dark cycle with free access to food pellets and tap water, available ad libitum. The experimental protocol was approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee (87534), Mashhad University of Medical Sciences and was performed in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Treatment scheduleThe animals were randomly divided into five different experimental groups of seven animals each. Group 1 (sham group) received single intraperitoneal (IP) injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus 1 µl of normal saline which was infused into the left hippocampus, 30 min later. Group 2 (QA group) received single IP injection of normal saline (10 ml/kg) plus intrahippocampal (IH) administration of QA (300 nmol/1 μl/rat), 30 min later. Groups 3-5 (treatment groups) were injected by safranal (72.75, 145.5, and 291 mg/kg, IP), 30 min prior to QA administration (300 nmol/1 μl/rat, IH).
Intrahippocampal administration of QAThe animals were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (400 mg/kg, IP and then positioned in a stereotaxic apparatus (Stoelting, US). After exposing the bregma suture, a small burr hole was made through the skull to permit access of microinjection needle into the left ventral hippocampus according to the brain atlas of Paxinos and Watson (AP 3.7 mm, ML 2.4 mm, and DV 3.2 mm) (27 ). Using a 29-gauge stainless steel needle connected to a Hamilton syringe (Bonaduz, GR, Switzerland), one microliter saline solution containing 300 nmol QA (or vehicle alone as control) was unilaterally microinjected into the left ventral hippocampus region over a period of 1 min and left in situ for another 1 min to prevent back diffusion of the injected drug solution (28 (link), Figure 1). Following surgery, the animals were kept warm to recover from surgery and maintained in suitable situation for 24 hr. After that, the animals were decapitated, brains were quickly removed, kept in ice-cold saline, and the extracted hippocampi were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and maintained at -80°C until processing. The injection site was also verified using 1 µl methylene blue and anatomical observation.
The left hippocampus portion was gently homogenized in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (0.1 M, pH 7.4) to give a 10% homogeny suspension and used for biochemical and comet assay.
Ferric reducing/antioxidant power (FRAP) assayThe basis of FRAP assay is reducing the colorless FeIII-TPTZ complex to blue colored FeII-TPTZ complex, by action of electron donating antioxidants in biological samples (29 (link)). The FRAP reagent consists of 300 mM acetate buffer (pH=3.6), 10 mM TPTZ in 40 mM HCl, and 20 mM FeCl3.6H2O in the ratio of 10:1:1.
Briefly, 50 μl of homogenate was added to 1.5 ml freshly prepared and prewarmed (37ºC) FRAP reagent in a test tube and incubated at 37ºC for 10 min. The absorbance of the blue colored complex was read against reagent blank (1.5 ml FRAP reagent + 50 μl distilled water) at 593 nm. Standard solutions of FeII in the range of 100 to 1000 mM were prepared from ferrous sulphate (FeSO4.7H2O) in distilled water. FRAP values were expressed as nmol ferric ions reduced to ferrous form/mg tissue (29 (link)).
Total sulfhydryl (SH) groups measurementTotal thiol content was estimated based on the Ellman method (30 (link)). In this method, SH groups react with chromogenic DTNB and produce a yellow-colored dianion (5-thio-2- nitrobenzoic acid, TNB), which has peak absorbance at 412 nm.
Briefly, 1 ml Tris-EDTA buffer (0.1 M Tris, 10 mM EDTA, pH=8.6) was added to 50 µl homogenate sample in 2 ml cuvettes. Sample absorbance was read at 412 nm against Tris-EDTA buffer alone (A1), then 20 µl DTNB reagent (10 mM in methanol) was added to the mixture. Following 15 min incubation at room temperature, the sample absorbance was read again (A2). DTNB reagent absorbance was also read as a blank (B). Total thiol concentration was calculated by the following equation and expressed as nmol/mg tissue (22 (link)).
Total thiol concentration (mM) = (A2-A1-B) × (1.07/0.05) × 13.6
Thiobarbituric acid reactive species measurementHippocampal lipid peroxides formation was measured as malondialdehyde (MDA), which is the end product of lipid peroxidation and reacts with thiobarbituric acid (TBA) as a TBA reactive substance (TBARS) to produce a pink colored complex which has peak absorbance at 535 nm (31 ). In brief, 1 ml of homogenate sample was mixed with 2 ml of TCA-TBA-HCl reagent (15% TCA, 0.67% TBA, and 0.25N HCl) and heated for 45 min in a boiling water bath. After cooling, the mixture was centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected, and the absorbance was read against blank, at 535 nm. The amount of MDA produced was calculated, using a molar absorption coefficient of 1.56×105 M-1cm-1 and expressed as nmol/g tissue (32 (link)).
Alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE) assayThe in vivo alkaline SCGE (comet) assay was conducted based on the method described by Sasaki et al with some modifications (33 (link)). In brief, 10 µl of the hippocampus cells suspension, prepared as above, was mixed with 90 µl LMP agarose (0.5% in physiological saline), and the mixture was quickly layered over a microscope slide precoated with a layer of 100 µl NMP agarose (1% in physiological saline), the slides were then covered with a cover slip, and placed on ice to allow agarose to gel. Finally, another layer of LMP agarose was added on top. The slides were immersed immediately in a chilled lysing solution (pH 10) made up of 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM Na2EDTA, 10 mM Trizma, 1% sarkosyl, 10% DMSO, and 1% Triton X-100, and kept at 0C in the dark overnight. Then, the slides were placed on a horizontal gel electrophoresis platform and covered with a chilled alkaline solution made up of 300 mM NaOH and 1 mM Na2EDTA (pH>13). They were left in the solution in the dark at 0C for 40 min, and then electrophoresed at 0C in the dark for 30 min at 25 V and approximately 300 mA. The slides were rinsed gently three times with 400 mM Trizma solution (pH 7.5) to neutralize the excess alkali, stained with 50 µl of 20 mg/mL ethidium bromide, and covered with a cover slip.
One hundred nuclei per organ from each animal (50 nuclei on one slide) were examined and photographed using a fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Kyoto, Japan) at 400X magnification equipped with an excitation filter of 520-550 nm and a barrier filter of 580 nm. Undamaged cells resemble an intact nucleus without a tail, and damaged cells have the appearance of a comet. The percent of DNA in the comet tail (%tail DNA), which is an estimate of DNA damage, was measured using a computerized image analysis software (CASP software).
Statistical analysisThe statistical analysis was performed using Prism 5.00 for Windows software (Graph-Pad Software, San Diego, CA). Data were expressed as mean±SEM. Comparisons between the study groups were made using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey-Kramer post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. The p-values less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

Corresponding organizations : Mashhad University of Medical Sciences

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Protocol search & design
(papers, patents, application notes)
2. Protocol validation
(from literature and MDAR)
3. Lab Product search
4. Product validation from literature
5. Troubleshoot product/ protocol
6. Instant figure generation New
Want to copy this response? Create your account to unlock copy/paste and export options.