Free access supported by contributions and sponsoring — share your knowledge or support us financially
Search / Compare / Validate Lab equipment & Methods

Porcine skin gelatin

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Germany, Switzerland, India, Sao Tome and Principe
About the product

Porcine skin gelatin is a type of gelatin derived from the skin of pigs. It is a natural, protein-based material that is commonly used in various applications, including as a component in laboratory equipment and procedures.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Market Availability & Pricing

Porcine skin gelatin is an officially listed product from Merck Group and available through their authorized distributors. The product is currently commercialized and pricing typically ranges from $50 to $200, depending on the quantity and specific variant.

Need Operating Instructions, SDS, or distributor details? Just ask our AI Agent.

Is this product still available?

Get pricing insights and sourcing options

Product FAQ

107 protocols using «porcine skin gelatin»

1

Fabrication of Synthetic Posterior Lens Capsule

2025
The sPLC was fabricated to resemble the physical structure of the exposed human PLC after phacoemulsification.27 (link) Briefly, a 3D human lens mimic with a 9.5 mm equatorial diameter and an 8.0 mm PRC was designed in SolidWorks (Dassault Systems, Waltham, MA, USA), 3D-printed using a high resolution PolyJet process (Objet 3D Printer; Stratasys, Los Angeles, CA, USA), and polished by an acetone vapor method. Next, the 3D-printed lens was placed into a sterile solution of 10% gelatin (porcine skin; Millipore Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) and 0.25% glutaraldehyde (no. G6257; Sigma Aldrich) to imprint the shape of the sPLC.28 (link),31 After solidification at 4°C for 30 minutes, the 3D-printed lens was removed to reveal the sPLC for subsequent studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Visualizing FCV Infection in CrFK Cells

2024
CrFK cells were grown on coverslips and mock-infected or infected with FCV URB strain at an MOI of 5, GA- or DMSO-treated; infection was allowed for 6 h, and cells were washed two times with prewarmed and filtered 1× PBS for 5 min. After washing, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in 1× PBS at RT for 15 min, washed three times with filtered 1× PBS, permeabilized with 0.001% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS for 5 min, washed three more times with filtered 1× PBS and blocked with 0.5 % porcine skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich) in filtered PBS at RT for 30 min. Primary antibodies were used as follows: anti-Hsp90β (1:100, ab29270; Abcam) or anti-VP1 serum (1:200, own laboratory); both antibodies were diluted in filtered PBS and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Then, samples were washed three times with filtered 1× PBS for 5 min before incubating with the corresponding secondary antibodies and diluted 1:200 in 1× PBS at RT for 2 h. Samples were washed thrice with filtered 1× PBS and incubated with DAPI at a 1 mg ml−1 concentration at RT for 5 min. Samples were washed thrice with filtered 1× PBS, mounted with VECTASHIELD (Vector Laboratories), and analysed with a Zeiss LSM-700 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Inhibition ELISA for rSola l 7 Antibody Binding

2024
To assess the effect of FFA binding to rSola l 7 on the recognition by specific anti‐rSola l 7 rabbit IgG polyclonal antibodies (kindly provided by Dr. Carlos Pastor‐Vargas), inhibition ELISAs were carried out after coating 96‐well plates (Costar) with 0.1 μg of pure recombinant allergen. Anti‐Sola l 7 IgGs were blocked by incubation with rSola l 7, which was previously allowed to interact for 2 h in blocking buffer [PBS, pH 7.4, 1% (w/v) porcine skin gelatin (Sigma‐Aldrich), and 1% (v/v) methanol] with FFAs in a 2:1 lipid to protein molar ratio. Then, the different samples were added to the coated wells and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, incubation with a 1:3000 diluted HRP‐conjugated goat‐anti‐rabbit IgG antibody (Bio‐Rad) was carried out for 1 h. Finally, wells were washed again, and color development was performed using 3,3′,5,5′‐tetramethylbenzidine (TMB; Merck) and OD was measured at 450 nm after stopping the reaction with 2 M sulfuric acid. Inhibition of rSola l 7 recognition by the polyclonal antibodies was previously optimized to obtain 100% inhibition; controls without FFAs, but in the presence of 1% methanol were always included, as well as blanks without IgGs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Photocrosslinkable Chitosan-Based Hydrogel

2024
Eight arm-PEG (molecular weight, MW = 20000), porcine skin gelatin, and lithium phenyl-2,4,6-Trimethylbenzoyl phosphinate (LAP) photoinitiator were procured from Sigma-Aldrich. Chitosan (Mw: 30 × 104 Da approx, degree of de-acetylation: 92 %) was obtained from Zhongfayuan Biological Technology Co. Ltd. (Shenzhen, China). Polystyrene sulfonate (PSS) (MW = 1.7 × 104) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Trizol reagent, PrimeScript RT reagent kit, and TB Green Premix Ex Taq™ were acquired from Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Dalian, China). Gene primers were synthesized by Shanghai Bioengineering Technology Co. Ltd. All cell culture-related reagents were sourced from Gibco (Grand Island, NY, USA). The PET LARS artificial ligament was obtained from Huashan Hospital (Fudan University, Shanghai).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

3D Vascular Mapping and Pericyte Analysis

2024
Overall procedure remains similar to our previous publication29 (link). The detailed procedure has been included in a separate protocol paper33 (link). Briefly, animals were deeply anesthetized with ketamine-xylazine, and perfused with 1X PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde to wash out blood and allow for tissue fixation, respectively. For vessel labeling, immediately following 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% (w/v) fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated albumin (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no.: A9771-1G) in a 2% (w/v) solution of porcine skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich, cat.no: G1890-500G) was perfused to obtain vascular filling. For STPT imaging, the brain sample was embedded in oxidized agarose and cross-linked in 0.05 M sodium borohydrate at 4 °C for at least 2 days ahead of imaging. We used 910 nm wavelength (UltraII, Coherent) as excitation light for all samples. Signals in the green and red spectrum were simultaneously collected using 560 nm dichroic mirror at x,y = 1,1 μm resolution in every 50 μm z (for pericyte mapping) or x,y,z = 1,1,5 μm resolution (for vascular mapping).
We utilized our previously described software pipeline to perform de-aberration, normalization, and imaging stitching steps for all STPT data collected for this study29 (link). Moreover, we used the same analytical tools to binarize the vessel signals and skeletonize for further analysis. This pipeline also performs cleaning/reconnecting of artifacts, traces the vessel diameter, and finally outputs the coordinates for each vessel segment and its connectivity. The distance to the nearest vasculature is calculated by probing all tissue space in the data and finding the average distance to its nearest vasculature surface. For every point being probed, we first take all the vasculature data within the +/− 100 µm cartesian coordinated cube and calculate the straight-line distance between the probe and each vascular data point inside the cube. Then we take the minimum of those distances as the distance to the nearest vasculature for that probing point. We performed our calculation at 10 µm isotropic voxel resolution probing, which provides enough data entry for each ROI that is at least 100 µm in size. For pericyte cell counting, we used previously developed Deep Learning Neural Network (DLNN) cell counting29 (link). This DLNN uses a per-cell multi-resolution-hybrid ResNet classification with potential cell locations to reduce computational time and resources without loss of quality. While aged mouse brains do have increased noise due to the accumulation of cellular debris, we validated that our DLNN pipeline performed at the same level as with young adult mice and did not incorporate cellular debris as potential cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

Top 5 protocols citing «porcine skin gelatin»

1

Porcine Eye Biomechanics Characterization

Eight porcine eye balls were enucleated about 1 hour after death from 35–40 kg female pigs that were part of IACUC approved studies. The eyes were immersed in saline solution and then transported to the authors’ laboratory for experimental preparation. To support the eye ball for experiment, the eye was supported on some rubber materials and placed in a testing plastic container. A gelatin mixture was prepared from porcine skin gelatin (SIGMA-ALDRICH, Inc). The gelatin mixture was heated to 60° and then cooled down to the room temperature. The cooled gelatin mixture was poured into the plastic container to support the eye ball. The gelatin surrounded the eye ball but did not cover the surface of the eye ball completely. The gelatin mixture provided the support for the eye ball for experiment. The gelatin may also absorb some wave energy and reduce the wave reflection from hard boundaries of the testing container. The completed eye and gelatin structure was allowed to set overnight. The eye ball experiments were performed on the following day. In order to change the pressure in the eye ball, a 25 gauge butterfly needle was inserted into the vitreous humor space close to the cornea of the eye under the ultrasound imaging guidance. The needle was connected to a 10 mL syringe filled with water. The syringe was mounted on a retort stand and changed to different heights. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was obtained by the water height difference between the water level in the syringe and the water level in the testing container. Some water was put in the testing container for ultrasound measurement of the eye ball.
Intraocular pressure was maintained at a pressure between 5 and 30 mmHg and changed gradually at an interval of 5 mmHg by raising the syringe (Fig. 1). At each pressure level (5, 10 15, 20 25 and 30 mmHg), a sinusoidal vibration signal of 0.1 s duration was generated by a function generator (Model 33120A, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA). The vibration signals were used at three frequencies of 100, 150, and 200 Hz. The excitation signal at a frequency was amplified by an audio amplifier (Model D150A, Crown Audio Inc., Elkhart, IN) and then drove an electromagnetic shaker (Model: FG-142, Labworks Inc., Costa Mesa, CA 92626) mounted on a stand. The shaker applied a 0.1s harmonic vibration on the surface of the eye ball using an indenter with 3 mm diameter (Fig. 1). The propagation of the vibration wave in the ocular tissues was measured using an ultrasound probe (Verasonics, Inc, Kirkland, WA) submerged in water and mounted above the cornea on another stand. The ultrasound system was equipped with a linear array transducer (L11-4, Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA) transmitting at 6.4 MHz center frequency. The measurements were repeated three times at each frequency and each pressure level.
The wave motions were measured at eight locations in the cornea for each pressure level and for each frequency. The tissue motion at a location was measured by analyzing the ultrasound tracking beam through that location [22 (link)]. The wave speed was analyzed by the change in wave phase with distance. Using the tissue motion at the first location as a reference, the wave speed was measured using the wave phase delay of the remaining locations relative to the first location (Fig. 2). At each frequency, the wave speed in the cornea was estimated using a phase gradient method,
cs(f)=2πfΔrΔϕ, where Δr is the distance between 2 detected locations and Δϕ is the phase change over that distance, f is the excitation frequency in Hz. Three measurements were made at each frequency. It has been shown that on gelatin phantoms the wave speed estimation has a standard error less than 10% based on 7-point regression [23 (link)]. Therefore, it is necessary to obtain multiple measurements of Δϕ and a statistical regression to get accurate estimates of wave speed. Ideally, the phase of the surface wave ϕ at a particular frequency has a linear relationship with the distance. The wave speed was measured over eight locations in the central region of the cornea and analyzed with a linear regression curve obtained using a least-squares fitting technique on multiple Δϕ measurements,
Δϕ^=-αΔr+β, where Δϕ̂ denotes the linear regression value of multiple Δϕ measurements, α and β are regression parameters, and the wave speed is calculated as follows,
The quality of the measurement of wave speed was assured by the sum of squares of linear regression residuals (R2) being ≥ 0.8 [22 (link)]. R2 is the coefficient of determinant ranging from 0 to 1, a statistical measure of how close the data fit the regression line. In general, the higher the R2, the better the model fits the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
2

Synthesis of Biofunctional Hydrogel Precursors

Glycidal methacrylate-hyaluronic acid (GM-HA) was synthesized according to a protocol modified from previous work [25 (link)]. 1g of hyaluronic acid was first dissolved in 100ml of acetone/water (50/50) solution at room temperature overnight. 7.2ml tri-ethylamine (Sigma–Aldrich) and 7.2ml glycidyl methacrylate (Sigma–Aldrich) were added dropwise both at 20-fold excess in succession until thoroughly mixed. The solution was covered with aluminum foil and stirred overnight at room temperature. The resulting solution was then dialyzed against DI water with 3.5 kDa tubing (Spectrum Labs) at room temperature. The DI water was changed after 2 hours, 4 hours and 24 hours. The dialyzed solution was frozen overnight at −80 °C and then lyophilized for 48 hours at 0.040 mbar and −50 °C. The lyophilized GM-HA was stored at −80 °C for future use.
Gelatin methacrylate (GelMa) was synthesized according to a protocol adapted from previous work [26 (link)]. Briefly, 10% (w/v) porcine skin gelatin (Sigma–Aldrich) was dissolved into Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) by stirring at 60 °C. Methacrylate anhydride (Sigma–Aldrich) was added to the solution at a rate of 0.5 ml/min until the final concentration of 8% (v/v) MA was reached. The reaction continued for 3 hours at 60 °C with constant stirring. After 3 hours, the resulted solution was diluted 1:1 with warm DPBS and dialyzed against DI water with 13.5 kDa tubing for 1 week at 40 °C. The dialyzed solution was then frozen at − 80 °C and lyophilized for 1 week. The lyophilized GelMa was store at − 80 °C for future use.
Photoinitiator lithium phenyl-2,4,6 trimethylbenzoylphosphinate (LAP) was synthesized according to previously published work [27 (link)]. Briefly, 3.2g (0.018mol) of 2,4,6-trimethylbenzoyl chloride (Sigma–Aldrich) was added dropwise to an equal molar amount of dimethyl phenylphosphonite (3g, Acros Organics) with continuous stirring at room temperature under argon. After 18 hours, 6.1g lithium bromide (Sigma–Aldrich) dissolved in 100ml of 2-butanone (Sigma–Aldrich) was added into the previous mixture at 4-fold excess. The reaction was then heated to 50 °C and a solid precipitate was formed after 10 min. The mixture was allowed to cool down to room temperature and rest for overnight before filtration. 2-butanone was used to wash the filtrate and remove the unreacted lithium bromide. After 3 times wash and filtration, the excess solvent was removed by vacuum, leaving LAP in a white solid chunk state which was pestled into powder. LAP was stored at − 80 °C under argon for future use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3

Synthesis and Characterization of GelMA

GelMA was synthesized as described previously [21 (link)]. Briefly, porcine skin gelatin (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was mixed at 10%(w/v) into phosphate buffered saline (PBS; Gibco, Billings, MT, USA) and stirred at 60 °C until fully dissolved. Methacrylic anhydride (MA; Sigma) was added to the solution at a rate of 0.5 ml/min until a concentration of 8% (v/v) of MA was obtained in the gelatin solution. The solution was then stirred for 1 h at 50 °C, followed by a 2x dilution with warm PBS and dialyzed against distilled water using 12–14 kDa cutoff dialysis tubing (Spectrum Laboratories, Rancho Dominguez, CA, USA) for one week at 40 °C to remove the unreacted groups from the solution. The GelMA solution was frozen overnight at −80 °C and lyophilized in a freeze dryer (Labonco, Kansas City, MO, USA) for one week. Freeze dried GelMA foam was stored at −80 °C until further usage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4

Measuring Cell Migration via Boyden Chambers

Cell migration was assayed using Boyden chambers (Degryse et al., 2001 (link)). In brief, PVP-free polycarbonate filters with 8-μm pores (Costar) were coated with 5 μg/ml porcine skin gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich). Serum-free RPMI (negative control), RPMI containing 10, 50, or 100 ng/ml HMGB1, and RPMI with 20% serum (positive control) were placed in the lower chambers. D16 cells were grown in RPMI plus 10% FCS, starved overnight, washed twice with PBS to eliminate any floating cells, and harvested with trypsin. 50,000 cells resuspended in 200 μl RPMI were placed in the upper chambers and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 16 h. Cells remaining on the upper surface of the filters were mechanically removed, and those which had migrated to the lower surface were fixed with ethanol, stained with Giemsa stain (modified; Sigma-Aldrich), and counted at 400× in 10 random fields per filter. Assays were performed in triplicate and repeated three times in independent experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
5

Establishment of In Vitro Blood-Brain Barrier Models

The human iPS cell lines 610B1 and 648A1 derived from human umbilical cord blood and human peripheral blood, respectively, were purchased from RIKEN BioResource Center (Tsukuba, Japan). The immortalized human BMEC cell line hCMEC/D3 was purchased from Merck Millipore (Burlington, MA, USA). The primary human BMECs and Complete Classic Medium with Serum and CultureBoost™ were purchased from Cell Systems Corporation (Kirkland, WA, USA). The primary BMECs derived from a monkey (Macaca irus) and the culture medium for BMECs were purchased from PharmaCo-Cell Co., Ltd. (Nagasaki, Japan). Fibronectin (FBN), StemSure® hPSC medium, l-glutamine, 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium and Ham’s nutrient mixture F-12 (DMEM/F12), hydrocortisone, l-ascorbic acid phosphate magnesium salt n-hydrate, and MEM nonessential amino acids were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Endothelial Cell Basal Medium 2 was purchased from Lonza (Basel, Switzerland). Porcine skin gelatin, 2-mercaptoethanol, fetal bovine serum, and 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid (HEPES) solution (1 M, pH 7.0–7.6) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Corporation (St. Louis, MO, USA). LN221F, laminin 411 fragment (LN411F), and laminin 511 fragment (LN511F) (imatrix 221, 411, and 511, respectively) were purchased from Nippi Incorporated (Tokyo, Japan). Gibco™ KnockOut™ Serum Replacement (KSR), Gibco™ Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) with Calcium and Magnesium, No Phenol Red, Human Endothelial-Serum-Free Medium (HE-SFM), Gibco™ Chemically Defined Lipid Concentrate, and Vitronectin-N (VTN-N) were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA, USA). Fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF2) was purchased from PeproTech, Inc. (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). Penicillin–streptomycin solution was purchased from Biological Industries USA, Inc. (Cromwell, CT, USA). An Agencourt RNAdvance Tissue Total RNA Purification Kit was purchased from Beckman Coulter, Inc. (Brea, CA, USA). ReverTra Ace® qPCR RT Master Mix was purchased from Toyobo Co., Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). KAPA SYBR® FAST qPCR Master Mix (2×) was purchased from Nippon Genetics Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Corning® Matrigel® Growth Factor Reduced (GFR) Basement Membrane Matrix, Falcon® Permeable Support for a 24-well plate with a 0.4-µm Transparent PET Membrane, and a Falcon® 24-well TC-treated Cell Polystyrene Permeable Support Companion Plate and a lid were purchased from Corning Incorporated (Corning, NY, USA). Platelet-poor plasma-derived bovine serum (PDS) and 1,1′-Dioctadecyl-3,3,3′,3′-tetramethyl-indocarbocyanine perchlorate acetylated low-density lipoprotein (Dil-Ac-LDL) were purchased from Alfa Aesar (Ward Hill, MA, USA). All-trans retinoic acid (RA) was purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). Accutase™ was purchased from Nacalai Tesque, Inc. (Kyoto, Japan). Cell Carrier-96 Black, Optically Clear Bottom microplates were purchased from PerkinElmer, Inc. (Waltham, MA, USA). Collagen type IV was purchased from Nitta Gelatin Inc. (Osaka, Japan). Total RNA from human primary BMECs (hBMECs) was purchased from ScienCell Research Laboratories, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!

🧪 Need help with an experiment or choosing lab equipment?
I search the PubCompare platform for you—tapping into 40+ million protocols to bring you relevant answers from scientific literature and vendor data.
1. Find protocols
2. Find best products for an experiment
3. Validate product use from papers
4. Check Product Compatibility
5. Ask a technical question
Want to copy this response? Upgrade to Premium to unlock copy/paste and export options.